waterline
Version:
An ORM for Node.js and the Sails framework
446 lines (370 loc) • 21.3 kB
JavaScript
/**
* Module dependencies
*/
var util = require('util');
var _ = require('@sailshq/lodash');
var flaverr = require('flaverr');
var getModel = require('../../ontology/get-model');
var getAttribute = require('../../ontology/get-attribute');
var isValidAttributeName = require('./is-valid-attribute-name');
/**
* normalizeSortClause()
*
* Validate and normalize the `sort` clause, rejecting obviously unsupported usage,
* and tolerating certain backwards-compatible things.
*
* --
*
* @param {Ref} sortClause
* A hypothetically well-formed `sort` clause from a Waterline criteria.
* (i.e. in a "stage 1 query")
* > WARNING:
* > IN SOME CASES (BUT NOT ALL!), THE PROVIDED VALUE WILL
* > UNDERGO DESTRUCTIVE, IN-PLACE CHANGES JUST BY PASSING IT
* > IN TO THIS UTILITY.
*
* @param {String} modelIdentity
* The identity of the model this `sort` clause is referring to (e.g. "pet" or "user")
* > Useful for looking up the Waterline model and accessing its attribute definitions.
*
* @param {Ref} orm
* The Waterline ORM instance.
* > Useful for accessing the model definitions.
*
* @param {Dictionary?} meta
* The contents of the `meta` query key, if one was provided.
* > Useful for propagating query options to low-level utilities like this one.
* --
*
* @returns {Array}
* The successfully-normalized `sort` clause, ready for use in a stage 2 query.
* > Note that the originally provided `sort` clause MAY ALSO HAVE BEEN
* > MUTATED IN PLACE!
*
*
* @throws {Error} If it encounters irrecoverable problems or unsupported usage in
* the provided `sort` clause.
* @property {String} code
* - E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE
*
*
* @throws {Error} If anything else unexpected occurs.
*/
module.exports = function normalizeSortClause(sortClause, modelIdentity, orm, meta) {
// Look up the Waterline model for this query.
// > This is so that we can reference the original model definition.
var WLModel = getModel(modelIdentity, orm);
// ╔═╗╔═╗╔╦╗╔═╗╔═╗╔╦╗╦╔╗ ╦╦ ╦╔╦╗╦ ╦
// ║ ║ ║║║║╠═╝╠═╣ ║ ║╠╩╗║║ ║ ║ ╚╦╝
// ╚═╝╚═╝╩ ╩╩ ╩ ╩ ╩ ╩╚═╝╩╩═╝╩ ╩ ╩
// If `sort` was provided as a dictionary...
if (_.isObject(sortClause) && !_.isArray(sortClause) && !_.isFunction(sortClause)) {
sortClause = _.reduce(_.keys(sortClause), function (memo, sortByKey) {
var sortDirection = sortClause[sortByKey];
// It this appears to be a well-formed comparator directive that was simply mistakenly
// provided at the top level instead of being wrapped in an array, then throw an error
// specifically mentioning that.
if (_.isString(sortDirection) && _.keys(sortClause).length === 1) {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid. If specified, it should be either '+
'a string like `\'fullName DESC\'`, or an array like `[ { fullName: \'DESC\' } ]`. '+
'But it looks like you might need to wrap this in an array, because instead, got: '+
util.inspect(sortClause, {depth:5})+''
));
}//-•
// Otherwise, continue attempting to normalize this dictionary into array
// format under the assumption that it was provided as a Mongo-style comparator
// dictionary. (and freaking out if we see anything that makes us uncomfortable)
var newComparatorDirective = {};
if (sortDirection === 1) {
newComparatorDirective[sortByKey] = 'ASC';
}
else if (sortDirection === -1) {
newComparatorDirective[sortByKey] = 'DESC';
}
else {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid. If specified as a '+
'dictionary, it should use Mongo-esque semantics, using -1 and 1 for the sort '+
'direction (something like `{ fullName: -1, rank: 1 }`). But instead, got: '+
util.inspect(sortClause, {depth:5})+''
));
}
memo.push(newComparatorDirective);
return memo;
}, []);//</_.reduce()>
// IWMIH, then we know a dictionary was provided that appears to be using valid Mongo-esque
// semantics, or that is at least an empty dictionary. Nonetheless, this usage is not recommended,
// and might be removed in the future. So log a warning:
console.warn('\n'+
'Warning: The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is specified as a dictionary (plain JS object),\n'+
'meaning that it is presumably using Mongo-esque semantics (something like `{ fullName: -1, rank: 1 }`).\n'+
'But as of Sails v1/Waterline 0.13, this is no longer the recommended usage. Instead, please use either\n'+
'a string like `\'fullName DESC\'`, or an array like `[ { fullName: \'DESC\' } ]`.\n'+
'(Since I get what you mean, tolerating & remapping this usage for now...)\n'
);
}//>-
// Tolerate empty array (`[]`), understanding it to mean the same thing as `undefined`.
if (_.isArray(sortClause) && sortClause.length === 0) {
sortClause = undefined;
// Note that this will be further expanded momentarily.
}//>-
// ╔╦╗╔═╗╔═╗╔═╗╦ ╦╦ ╔╦╗
// ║║║╣ ╠╣ ╠═╣║ ║║ ║
// ═╩╝╚═╝╚ ╩ ╩╚═╝╩═╝╩
// If no `sort` clause was provided, give it a default (empty) value,
// indicating the adapter should use its default sorting strategy
if (_.isUndefined(sortClause)) {
sortClause = [];
}//>-
// If `sort` was provided as a string, then expand it into an array.
// (We'll continue cleaning it up down below-- this is just to get
// it part of the way there-- e.g. we might end up with something like:
// `[ 'name DESC' ]`)
if (_.isString(sortClause)) {
sortClause = [
sortClause
];
}//>-
// If, by this time, `sort` is not an array...
if (!_.isArray(sortClause)) {
// Then the provided `sort` must have been highly irregular indeed.
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid. If specified, it should be either '+
'a string like `\'fullName DESC\'`, or an array like `[ { fullName: \'DESC\' } ]`. '+
'But instead, got: '+
util.inspect(sortClause, {depth:5})+''
));
}//-•
// Ensure that each item in the array is a structurally-valid comparator directive:
sortClause = _.map(sortClause, function (comparatorDirective){
// ┌┬┐┌─┐┬ ┌─┐┬─┐┌─┐┌┬┐┌─┐ ┌─┐┌┬┐┬─┐┬┌┐┌┌─┐ ┬ ┬┌─┐┌─┐┌─┐┌─┐
// │ │ ││ ├┤ ├┬┘├─┤ │ ├┤ └─┐ │ ├┬┘│││││ ┬ │ │└─┐├─┤│ ┬├┤
// ┴ └─┘┴─┘└─┘┴└─┴ ┴ ┴ └─┘ └─┘ ┴ ┴└─┴┘└┘└─┘ └─┘└─┘┴ ┴└─┘└─┘
// ┌─ ┌─┐ ┌─┐ ╔═╗╔╦╗╔═╗╦╦ ╔═╗╔╦╗╔╦╗╦═╗╔═╗╔═╗╔═╗ ╔═╗╔═╗╔═╗ ─┐
// │ ├┤ │ ┬ ║╣ ║║║╠═╣║║ ╠═╣ ║║ ║║╠╦╝║╣ ╚═╗╚═╗ ╠═╣╚═╗║ │
// └─ └─┘o└─┘o ╚═╝╩ ╩╩ ╩╩╩═╝╩ ╩═╩╝═╩╝╩╚═╚═╝╚═╝╚═╝ ╩ ╩╚═╝╚═╝ ─┘
// If this is a string, then morph it into a dictionary.
//
// > This is so that we tolerate syntax like `'name ASC'`
// > at the top level (since we would have expanded it above)
// > AND when provided within the array (e.g. `[ 'name ASC' ]`)
if (_.isString(comparatorDirective)) {
var pieces = comparatorDirective.split(/\s+/);
if (pieces.length === 2) {
// Good, that's what we expect.
}
else if (pieces.length === 1) {
// If there is only the attribute name specified, then assume that we're implying 'ASC'.
// > For example, if we worked together at a pet shelter where there were two dogs (named
// > "Suzy" and "Arnold") and a parrot named "Eleanor", and our boss asked us for a list of
// > all the animals, sorted by name, we'd most likely assume that the list should begin witih
// > Arnold the dog.
pieces.push('ASC');
}
else {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'Invalid `sort` clause in criteria. If specifying a string, it should look like '+
'e.g. `\'emailAddress ASC\'`, where the attribute name ("emailAddress") is separated '+
'from the sort direction ("ASC" or "DESC") by whitespace. But instead, got: '+
util.inspect(comparatorDirective, {depth:5})+''
));
}//-•
// Build a dictionary out of it.
comparatorDirective = {};
comparatorDirective[pieces[0]] = pieces[1];
}//>-•
// If this is NOT a dictionary at this point, then freak out.
if (!_.isObject(comparatorDirective) || _.isArray(comparatorDirective) || _.isFunction(comparatorDirective)) {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid, because, although it '+
'is an array, one of its items (aka comparator directives) has an unexpected '+
'data type. Expected every comparator directive to be a dictionary like `{ fullName: \'DESC\' }`. '+
'But instead, this one is: '+
util.inspect(comparatorDirective, {depth:5})+''
));
}//-•
// IWMIH, then we know we've got a dictionary.
//
// > This is where we assume it is a well-formed comparator directive
// > and casually/gently/lovingly validate it as such.
// ┌─┐┌─┐┬ ┬┌┐┌┌┬┐ ┬┌─┌─┐┬ ┬┌─┐
// │ │ ││ ││││ │ ├┴┐├┤ └┬┘└─┐
// └─┘└─┘└─┘┘└┘ ┴ ┴ ┴└─┘ ┴ └─┘
// Count the keys.
switch (_.keys(comparatorDirective).length) {
// Must not be an empty dictionary.
case 0:
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid, because, although it '+
'is an array, one of its items (aka comparator directives) is `{}`, an empty dictionary '+
'(aka plain JavaScript object). But comparator directives are supposed to have '+
'_exactly one_ key (e.g. so that they look something like `{ fullName: \'DESC\' }`.'
));
case 1:
// There should always be exactly one key.
// If we're here, then everything is ok.
// Keep going.
break;
// Must not have more than one key.
default:
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid, because, although it '+
'is an array, one of its items (aka comparator directives) is a dictionary (aka '+
'plain JavaScript object) with '+(_.keys(comparatorDirective).length)+ ' keys... '+
'But, that\'s too many keys. Comparator directives are supposed to have _exactly '+
'one_ key (e.g. so that they look something like `{ fullName: \'DESC\' }`. '+
'But instead, this one is: '+util.inspect(comparatorDirective, {depth:5})+''
));
}//</switch>
// ┌─┐┬ ┬┌─┐┌─┐┬┌─ ┌┬┐┬ ┬┌─┐┌┬┐ ┬┌─┌─┐┬ ┬ ┬┌─┐ ┬ ┬┌─┐┬ ┬┌┬┐ ┌─┐┌┬┐┌┬┐┬─┐
// │ ├─┤├┤ │ ├┴┐ │ ├─┤├─┤ │ ├┴┐├┤ └┬┘ │└─┐ └┐┌┘├─┤│ │ ││ ├─┤ │ │ ├┬┘
// └─┘┴ ┴└─┘└─┘┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴└─┘ ┴ ┴└─┘ └┘ ┴ ┴┴─┘┴─┴┘ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴└─
// Next, check this comparator directive's key (i.e. its "comparator target")
// • if this model is `schema: true`:
// ° the directive's key must be the name of a recognized attribute
// • if this model is `schema: false`:
// ° then the directive's key must be a conceivably-valid attribute name
var sortByKey = _.keys(comparatorDirective)[0];
var attrName;
var isDeepTarget;
var deepTargetHops;
if (_.isString(sortByKey)){
deepTargetHops = sortByKey.split(/\./);
isDeepTarget = (deepTargetHops.length > 1);
}
if (isDeepTarget) {
// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
// FUTURE: Replace this opt-in experimental support with official support for
// deep targets for comparator directives: i.e. dot notation for sorting by nested
// properties of JSON embeds.
// This will require additional tests + docs, as well as a clear way of indicating
// whether a particular adapter supports this feature so that proper error messages
// can be displayed otherwise.
// (See https://github.com/balderdashy/waterline/pull/1519)
// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
if (!meta || !meta.enableExperimentalDeepTargets) {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'Cannot use dot notation as the target for a `sort` comparator without enabling experimental '+
'support for "deep targets". Please try again with `.meta({enableExperimentalDeepTargets:true})`.'
));
}//•
attrName = deepTargetHops[0];
}
else {
attrName = sortByKey;
}
// Look up the attribute definition, if possible.
var attrDef;
try {
attrDef = getAttribute(attrName, modelIdentity, orm);
} catch (e){
switch (e.code) {
case 'E_ATTR_NOT_REGISTERED':
// If no matching attr def exists, then just leave `attrDef` undefined
// and continue... for now anyway.
break;
default: throw e;
}
}//</catch>
// If model is `schema: true`...
if (WLModel.hasSchema === true) {
// Make sure this matched a recognized attribute name.
if (!attrDef) {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid, because, although it '+
'is an array, one of its items (aka comparator directives) is problematic. '+
'It indicates that we should sort by `'+attrName+'`-- but that is not a recognized '+
'attribute for this model (`'+modelIdentity+'`). Since the model declares `schema: true`, '+
'this is not allowed.'
));
}//-•
}
// Else if model is `schema: false`...
else if (WLModel.hasSchema === false) {
// Make sure this is at least a valid name for a Waterline attribute.
if (!isValidAttributeName(attrName)) {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid, because, although it '+
'is an array, one of its items (aka comparator directives) is problematic. '+
'It indicates that we should sort by `'+attrName+'`-- but that is not a '+
'valid name for an attribute in Waterline.'
));
}//-•
} else { throw new Error('Consistency violation: Every instantiated Waterline model should always have a `hasSchema` property as either `true` or `false` (should have been derived from the `schema` model setting when Waterline was being initialized). But somehow, this model (`'+modelIdentity+'`) ended up with `hasSchema: '+util.inspect(WLModel.hasSchema, {depth:5})+'`'); }
// Now, make sure the matching attribute is _actually_ something that can be sorted on.
// In other words: it must NOT be a plural (`collection`) association.
if (attrDef && attrDef.collection) {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'Cannot sort by `'+attrName+'` because it corresponds with an "unsortable" attribute '+
'definition for this model (`'+modelIdentity+'`). This attribute is a plural (`collection`) '+
'association, so sorting by it is not supported.'
));
}//-•
if (isDeepTarget) {
// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
// FUTURE: See the other note above. This is still experimental.
// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
if (isDeepTarget && attrDef && attrDef.type !== 'json' && attrDef.type !== 'ref') {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'Cannot use dot notation to sort by a nested property of `'+attrName+'` because '+
'the corresponding attribute is not capable of holding embedded JSON data such as '+
'dictionaries (`{}`) or arrays (`[]`). '+
(attrDef.model||attrDef.collection?
'Dot notation is not currently supported for sorting across associations '+
'(see https://github.com/balderdashy/waterline/pull/1519 for details).'
:
'Sorting with dot notation is only supported for fields which might potentially '+
'contain embedded JSON.'
)
));
}//•
}//fi
// ┬ ┬┌─┐┬─┐┬┌─┐┬ ┬ ┌─┐┬┌┬┐┬ ┬┌─┐┬─┐ ╔═╗╔═╗╔═╗ ┌─┐┬─┐ ╔╦╗╔═╗╔═╗╔═╗
// └┐┌┘├┤ ├┬┘│├┤ └┬┘ ├┤ │ │ ├─┤├┤ ├┬┘ ╠═╣╚═╗║ │ │├┬┘ ║║║╣ ╚═╗║
// └┘ └─┘┴└─┴└ ┴ └─┘┴ ┴ ┴ ┴└─┘┴└─ ╩ ╩╚═╝╚═╝ └─┘┴└─ ═╩╝╚═╝╚═╝╚═╝
// ┬ ┌─┐┌┐┌┌─┐┬ ┬┬─┐┌─┐ ┌─┐┬─┐┌─┐┌─┐┌─┐┬─┐ ┌─┐┌─┐┌─┐┬┌┬┐┌─┐┬ ┬┌─┐┌─┐┌┬┐┬┌─┐┌┐┌
// ┌┼─ ├┤ │││└─┐│ │├┬┘├┤ ├─┘├┬┘│ │├─┘├┤ ├┬┘ │ ├─┤├─┘│ │ ├─┤│ │┌─┘├─┤ │ ││ ││││
// └┘ └─┘┘└┘└─┘└─┘┴└─└─┘ ┴ ┴└─└─┘┴ └─┘┴└─ └─┘┴ ┴┴ ┴ ┴ ┴ ┴┴─┘┴└─┘┴ ┴ ┴ ┴└─┘┘└┘
// And finally, ensure the corresponding value on the RHS is either 'ASC' or 'DESC'.
// (doing a little capitalization if necessary)
// Before doing a careful check, uppercase the sort direction, if safe to do so.
if (_.isString(comparatorDirective[sortByKey])) {
comparatorDirective[sortByKey] = comparatorDirective[sortByKey].toUpperCase();
}//>-
// Now verify that it is either ASC or DESC.
switch (comparatorDirective[sortByKey]) {
case 'ASC':
case 'DESC': //ok!
break;
default:
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'The `sort` clause in the provided criteria is invalid, because, although it '+
'is an array, one of its items (aka comparator directives) is problematic. '+
'It indicates that we should sort by `'+sortByKey+'`, which is fine. But then '+
'it suggests that Waterline should use `'+comparatorDirective[sortByKey]+'` '+
'as the sort direction. (Should always be either "ASC" or "DESC".)'
));
}//</switch>
// Return the modified comparator directive.
return comparatorDirective;
});//</_.map>
// ┌─┐┬ ┬┌─┐┌─┐┬┌─ ┌─┐┌─┐┬─┐ ╔╦╗╦ ╦╔═╗╦ ╦╔═╗╔═╗╔╦╗╔═╗╔═╗
// │ ├─┤├┤ │ ├┴┐ ├┤ │ │├┬┘ ║║║ ║╠═╝║ ║║ ╠═╣ ║ ║╣ ╚═╗
// └─┘┴ ┴└─┘└─┘┴ ┴ └ └─┘┴└─ ═╩╝╚═╝╩ ╩═╝╩╚═╝╩ ╩ ╩ ╚═╝╚═╝
// Finally, check that no two comparator directives mention the
// same target. (Because you can't sort by the same thing twice.)
var referencedComparatorTargets = [];
_.each(sortClause, function (comparatorDirective){
var sortByKey = _.keys(comparatorDirective)[0];
if (_.contains(referencedComparatorTargets, sortByKey)) {
throw flaverr('E_SORT_CLAUSE_UNUSABLE', new Error(
'Cannot sort by the same thing (`'+sortByKey+'`) twice!'
));
}//-•
referencedComparatorTargets.push(sortByKey);
});//</_.each>
// --• At this point, we know we are dealing with a properly-formatted
// & semantically valid array of comparator directives.
return sortClause;
};