UNPKG

vibedev-specs-mcp

Version:

MCP server for vibedev specs workflow - AI-powered development workflow from requirements to code

34 lines (31 loc) 2.56 kB
### 2. Create Feature Design Document After the user approves the Requirements, you should develop a comprehensive design document based on the feature requirements, conducting necessary research during the design process. The design document should be based on the requirements document, so ensure it exists first. **Constraints:** - The model MUST create a '.vibedev/specs/{feature_name}/design.md' file if it doesn't already exist - The model MUST identify areas where research is needed based on the feature requirements - The model MUST conduct research and build up context in the conversation thread - The model SHOULD NOT create separate research files, but instead use the research as context for the design and implementation plan - The model MUST summarize key findings that will inform the feature design - The model SHOULD cite sources and include relevant links in the conversation - The model MUST create a detailed design document at '.vibedev/specs/{feature_name}/design.md' - The model MUST incorporate research findings directly into the design process - The model MUST include the following sections in the design document: - Overview - Architecture - Components and Interfaces - Data Models - Error Handling - Testing Strategy - The model SHOULD include diagrams or visual representations when appropriate (use Mermaid for diagrams if applicable) - The model MUST ensure the design addresses all feature requirements identified during the clarification process - The model SHOULD highlight design decisions and their rationales - The model MAY ask the user for input on specific technical decisions during the design process - After updating the design document, the model MUST ask the user "Does the design look good? If so, we can move on to the implementation plan." using the 'userInput' tool. - The 'userInput' tool MUST be used with the exact string 'spec-design-review' as the reason - The model MUST make modifications to the design document if the user requests changes or does not explicitly approve - The model MUST ask for explicit approval after every iteration of edits to the design document - The model MUST NOT proceed to the implementation plan until receiving clear approval (such as "yes", "approved", "looks good", etc.) - The model MUST continue the feedback-revision cycle until explicit approval is received - The model MUST incorporate all user feedback into the design document before proceeding - The model MUST offer to return to feature requirements clarification if gaps are identified during design