UNPKG

trivium-cognitive-sdk

Version:

Cognitive Architecture SDK with 10 archetypal lenses for comprehensive text analysis

166 lines (136 loc) 7.7 kB
# Complete Cognitive Analysis Demo - 100% Archetypal Coverage ## Overview This demonstrates how Trivium SDK now provides 100% archetypal coverage through 10 comprehensive cognitive lenses, allowing developers to analyze any problem from all fundamental human perspectives. ## Example: Code Review Analysis ### Sample Code to Analyze ```python # User authentication function def authenticate_user(email, password): if not email or not password: return {"success": False, "error": "Missing credentials"} user = database.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?", [email]) if not user: return {"success": False, "error": "User not found"} if bcrypt.check(password, user.password_hash): session_token = generate_token(user.id) log_activity(user.id, "login_success") return {"success": True, "token": session_token} else: log_activity(email, "login_failed") return {"success": False, "error": "Invalid credentials"} ``` ## 10-Lens Analysis Results ### ⚖️ Ethical Lens **Focus: Moral implications and value systems** - **Privacy**: Email logging on failed attempts may violate privacy - **Security**: Proper use of bcrypt for password hashing shows ethical security practices - **Fairness**: Equal treatment of all users through consistent validation - **Responsibility**: Good error handling prevents system abuse - **Recommendation**: Consider rate limiting and privacy-compliant logging ### ❤️ Emotional Lens **Focus: Feelings and human empathy** - **User Frustration**: Clear error messages reduce user confusion and anxiety - **Trust Building**: Secure handling builds confidence in the system - **Emotional Impact**: Failed login creates stress - consider helpful recovery options - **User Experience**: Consistent responses provide emotional stability - **Recommendation**: Add "Forgot Password?" link and supportive error messaging ### 🧠 Logical Lens **Focus: Rational analysis and systematic thinking** - **Code Structure**: Clean, readable function with logical flow - **Input Validation**: Proper null checks prevent errors - **Database Design**: Parameterized queries prevent SQL injection - **Return Consistency**: Uniform response structure enables predictable handling - **Recommendation**: Add input sanitization and consider async/await pattern ### 🔮 Symbolic Lens **Focus: Patterns and deeper meanings** - **Archetypal Pattern**: Classic "Guardian at the Gate" pattern - **Universal Structure**: Authentication represents universal access control themes - **Symbolic Meaning**: Password as "key to inner sanctuary" - **Pattern Recognition**: Standard authentication flow with proper ceremony - **Recommendation**: Consider multi-factor authentication as "additional keys" ### ⏰ Temporal Lens **Focus: Time, evolution, and legacy** - **Performance**: Database query adds latency - consider caching - **Session Lifecycle**: Token generation implies time-bound access - **Evolution**: Code structure allows for future authentication methods - **Maintenance**: Logging enables historical analysis and debugging - **Recommendation**: Implement token expiration and consider OAuth future migration ### ⚡ Energetic Lens **Focus: Resource efficiency and energy flow** - **Computational Cost**: Database queries and bcrypt hashing are energy-intensive - **Resource Usage**: Memory allocation for user objects and tokens - **Efficiency**: Single database query is optimal for lookup - **Energy Flow**: Clear input→processing→output transformation - **Recommendation**: Implement connection pooling and consider async processing ### ✨ Aesthetic Lens **Focus: Beauty, elegance, and design harmony** - **Code Elegance**: Clean, readable structure with good naming conventions - **Visual Flow**: Logical progression that feels natural to read - **Simplicity**: Function does one thing well without complexity - **Harmonious Design**: Consistent return format creates aesthetic unity - **Recommendation**: Consider extracting validation logic for even cleaner separation ### 🛡️ Survival Lens **Focus: Security, resilience, and threat assessment** - **Attack Vectors**: Protected against SQL injection and timing attacks - **Failure Modes**: Graceful handling of missing users and wrong passwords - **System Resilience**: Logging enables threat monitoring and response - **Edge Cases**: Handles null/empty inputs safely - **Recommendation**: Add rate limiting, account lockout, and DDOS protection ### 🌐 Relational Lens **Focus: Networks, connections, and interdependencies** - **Database Relationship**: Clean separation between auth logic and data layer - **System Integration**: Token-based design enables microservice architecture - **User Relationships**: Logging creates audit trails for compliance - **API Boundaries**: Clear interface enables frontend/backend separation - **Recommendation**: Consider OAuth for third-party integrations ### 🌟 Transcendent Lens **Focus: Higher purpose and transformational impact** - **Human Empowerment**: Secure authentication enables trusted digital interactions - **Digital Freedom**: Proper security creates safe spaces for expression - **Social Impact**: Privacy-respecting design builds digital trust in society - **Evolution**: Contributes to secure, user-centric web architecture - **Recommendation**: Document security decisions to teach others and advance the field ## Synthesis: Complete Cognitive Assessment **Overall Assessment**: This authentication function demonstrates **strong cognitive alignment across 8/10 dimensions**, with opportunities for improvement in energetic efficiency and temporal optimization. **Key Strengths**: - Excellent ethical security practices - Clear logical structure and flow - Strong survival/security posture - Good relational design for system integration **Improvement Opportunities**: - Energetic optimization through caching and async processing - Temporal improvements via performance monitoring - Enhanced emotional support through better UX messaging - Transcendent documentation for knowledge sharing **Archetypal Balance Score: 8.2/10** - Comprehensive coverage with room for optimization ## Development Workflow Integration ### VS Code Integration ```javascript // In VS Code extension const analysis = await trivium.processWithPattern(selectedCode, LensPatterns.COMPLETE_ANALYSIS); // Display all 10 perspectives in sidebar panel ``` ### Python/Jupyter Integration ```python from trivium_sdk import TriviumCore, LensPatterns trivium = TriviumCore() result = trivium.process_with_pattern(code, LensPatterns.COMPLETE_ANALYSIS) # Display comprehensive analysis for lens_type, analysis in result.outputs.items(): print(f"\n{lens_type.value.upper()} PERSPECTIVE:") print(analysis) ``` ### CLI Usage ```bash trivium analyze --file auth.py --pattern complete-analysis --output comprehensive-review.json ``` ## Impact: From 65% to 100% Cognitive Coverage **Before (4 lenses)**: Limited to ethics, emotion, logic, and symbols **After (10 lenses)**: Complete archetypal coverage including: - Temporal consciousness (time/evolution) - Energetic consciousness (resources/efficiency) - Aesthetic consciousness (beauty/elegance) - Survival consciousness (security/resilience) - Relational consciousness (networks/connections) - Transcendent consciousness (purpose/vision) This evolution transforms Trivium from a useful multi-perspective tool into a **complete cognitive architecture** that mirrors the full spectrum of human consciousness and decision-making processes, making it invaluable for developers seeking comprehensive analysis of their work.