UNPKG

skills-ws

Version:

87 agent skills for AI coding assistants — marketing, growth, web3, dev, design & operations. Built for OpenClaw, Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex.

78 lines (59 loc) • 4.08 kB
## Contents - 4. Freemium Strategy - What to Gate vs What to Give Free - Usage-Based vs Feature-Based Limits - Free-to-Paid Conversion Benchmarks - Reverse Trial Pattern ## 4. Freemium Strategy ### What to Gate vs What to Give Free **The freemium golden rule:** Give away enough that users experience core value and NEED more. Exact plan limits below are *illustrative shapes*, not current quotes — vendors retune them constantly. Confirm any number against the vendor's live pricing page before you cite it. | Gate Type | Give Free | Gate (Paid) | Example pattern | |-----------|----------|------------|----------| | Usage limits | A few projects/items | Unlimited | Notion, Trello (item/board caps on free) | | Feature gates | Core features | Advanced features (analytics, automations) | Slack (advanced features paid) | | Seat limits | Small team cap | Larger / unlimited seats | Figma, Linear (per-seat paid tiers) | | Storage limits | A few GB | Tens–hundreds of GB | Dropbox, Google Drive | | Support tier | Community/docs | Priority/dedicated | Most SaaS | | History/retention | Recent history only | Full history | Slack (free tier limits how far back you can search/see messages — verify the current window at slack.com/pricing) | **Rules for gating:** - Free must include the aha moment (never gate the first value experience) - Gate the "more" not the "first" — free users should be happy, paid users need scale - Natural expansion triggers: team growth, usage growth, sophistication growth - Don't cripple the free product (frustrated free users don't convert, they churn) ### Usage-Based vs Feature-Based Limits | Approach | Pros | Cons | Best for | |----------|------|------|----------| | Usage-based | Natural upgrade path, aligns with value | Revenue unpredictable, hard to forecast | API products, infra, storage | | Feature-based | Predictable tiers, easy to understand | May feel arbitrary, feature bloat | Collaboration tools, analytics | | Seat-based | Scales with team adoption | Discourages sharing, invites workarounds | Team productivity tools | | Hybrid | Best of both worlds | Complex pricing page | Most mature PLG companies | ### Free-to-Paid Conversion Benchmarks Bands are industry rules of thumb; the per-company percentages are rough, widely-circulated estimates (not audited disclosures) — treat them as illustrative of the tier, not as quotable facts. | Conversion Rate | Rating | Typical of | |----------------|--------|----------| | 1-2% | Below average | Broad consumer products | | 2-5% | Average / healthy | Most B2B SaaS (broad-funnel freemium) | | 5-10% | Strong | High-intent products (clear paid use case) | | 10%+ | Exceptional | Niche/high-value products (premium positioning) | **To improve conversion:** - Reduce time-to-value (faster activation = higher conversion) - Contextual upgrade prompts (at point of need, not random) - Show what they're missing ("Upgrade to unlock X" vs invisible features) - Reverse trial (see below) ### Reverse Trial Pattern Instead of freemium → upgrade, give FULL access → downgrade after trial. ``` Day 0: Sign up → Full product access (all features, no limits) Day 14: Trial expires → Downgrade to free tier Result: Users experience premium value, feel the loss, convert at higher rates ``` **Reverse trial benchmarks (directional, not guaranteed — depends heavily on product and ICP):** - Traditional freemium: ~2-5% conversion - Reverse trial: often 2-3x that (commonly cited in the ~7-15% range) - The pattern is widely used by collaboration and productivity SaaS (e.g., Slack and many Notion-style tools default new workspaces into a time-boxed full-feature experience before downgrading). Confirm any specific company's current flow yourself — onboarding designs change frequently. **Implementation tips:** - Clear countdown ("7 days left of Pro features") - Highlight premium features being used ("You've used Advanced Analytics 12 times") - Graceful downgrade (don't delete their data, just restrict access) - Easy upgrade path at the moment of downgrade