prompt-plus-plus-mcp

{ "category": "AI Core Principles", "description": "Critical thinking enhancement frameworks that systematically improve decision-making and problem-solving. These principles challenge assumptions, demand evidence, and expand perspectives to reveal better solutions.", "use_cases": [ "Decision analysis and validation", "Assumption challenging and testing", "Stakeholder perspective analysis", "Risk assessment and mitigation", "Requirements clarification", "Long-term impact evaluation" ], "strategies": [ { "key": "assumption_detector", "name": "Assumption Detector", "description": "Systematically identifies and challenges hidden assumptions in requirements, constraints, and implementation approaches", "best_for": ["Technical requirements", "System constraints", "Implementation planning"], "triggers": ["assumption", "suppose", "expect", "given that"], "output_focus": "Assumption validation and edge case discovery" }, { "key": "devils_advocate", "name": "Devil's Advocate", "description": "Generates systematic counterarguments to test decision robustness and identify failure modes", "best_for": ["High-stakes decisions", "Solution validation", "Risk assessment"], "triggers": ["decision", "choice", "alternative", "vs"], "output_focus": "Counterarguments and alternative approaches" }, { "key": "ripple_effect", "name": "Ripple Effect Analyzer", "description": "Traces cascading consequences of decisions across systems, teams, and time horizons", "best_for": ["System changes", "Process modifications", "Impact assessment"], "triggers": ["consequences", "impact", "effects", "ripple"], "output_focus": "Cascading impacts and mitigation strategies" }, { "key": "perspective_multiplier", "name": "Perspective Multiplier", "description": "Analyzes problems through multiple stakeholder lenses to reveal blind spots and conflicts", "best_for": ["Multi-stakeholder systems", "User experience", "Team dynamics"], "triggers": ["stakeholder", "perspective", "viewpoint", "different"], "output_focus": "Multi-stakeholder analysis and conflict resolution" }, { "key": "evidence_seeker", "name": "Evidence Seeker", "description": "Demands concrete evidence and validation before accepting claims or making decisions", "best_for": ["Claim validation", "Performance assertions", "Quality metrics"], "triggers": ["evidence", "proof", "validate", "verify"], "output_focus": "Evidence requirements and validation methods" }, { "key": "pattern_recognizer", "name": "Pattern Recognizer", "description": "Identifies recurring patterns, anti-patterns, and predictive indicators across systems", "best_for": ["System analysis", "Troubleshooting", "Trend identification"], "triggers": ["pattern", "similar", "recurring", "repeated"], "output_focus": "Pattern analysis and predictive insights" }, { "key": "root_cause_analyzer", "name": "Root Cause Analyzer", "description": "Systematically drills down to fundamental causes using 5 Whys, Fishbone, and systems thinking", "best_for": ["Problem solving", "Issue investigation", "System failures"], "triggers": ["why", "root cause", "underlying", "fundamental"], "output_focus": "Root cause identification and systematic prevention" }, { "key": "constraint_identifier", "name": "Constraint Identifier", "description": "Maps explicit and hidden constraints to distinguish real limitations from assumed boundaries", "best_for": ["Solution space expansion", "Innovation opportunities", "Resource optimization"], "triggers": ["constraint", "limitation", "cannot", "impossible"], "output_focus": "Constraint mapping and expansion opportunities" }, { "key": "paradox_navigator", "name": "Paradox Navigator", "description": "Resolves contradictory requirements through creative synthesis and both/and thinking", "best_for": ["Conflicting requirements", "Trade-off resolution", "Innovation challenges"], "triggers": ["paradox", "contradiction", "conflicting", "both"], "output_focus": "Creative synthesis and paradox resolution" }, { "key": "tradeoff_tracker", "name": "Tradeoff Tracker", "description": "Makes all tradeoffs explicit including hidden costs like technical debt and opportunity costs", "best_for": ["Decision optimization", "Cost-benefit analysis", "Resource allocation"], "triggers": ["tradeoff", "sacrifice", "cost", "benefit"], "output_focus": "Comprehensive tradeoff analysis and optimization" }, { "key": "context_expander", "name": "Context Expander", "description": "Broadens frame of reference to prevent local optimization that creates broader problems", "best_for": ["System-level thinking", "Strategic decisions", "Architecture choices"], "triggers": ["context", "broader", "bigger picture", "system"], "output_focus": "Expanded context and system-level optimization" }, { "key": "precision_questioner", "name": "Precision Questioner", "description": "Transforms vague requirements into precise, actionable specifications through systematic questioning", "best_for": ["Requirement gathering", "Specification clarity", "Ambiguity resolution"], "triggers": ["vague", "unclear", "ambiguous", "clarify"], "output_focus": "Precise specifications and validation criteria" }, { "key": "time_capsule_test", "name": "Time Capsule Test", "description": "Projects decisions across multiple time horizons to assess durability and maintainability", "best_for": ["Long-term planning", "Architecture decisions", "Technology choices"], "triggers": ["future", "long-term", "maintainability", "legacy"], "output_focus": "Temporal analysis and future-proofing strategies" } ] }