prisma-extension-casl
Version:
Enforce casl abilities on prisma client
191 lines (155 loc) • 6.72 kB
Markdown
# Prisma Extension CASL
[Prisma client extension](https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/prisma-client/client-extensions) that utilizes [CASL](https://casl.js.org/) to enforce authorization logic on most queries.
> [!CAUTION]
>
> Please be very careful using this library in production! Test your endpoints on your own and raise an issue if some case is not supported by this library! - But that is advisable in general for authorization on endpoints.
>
> This extension should be added last. Since it creates interactive transactions internally. There might still be issues with batching causing N+1 problems.
- Supports only CRUD actions `create`, `read`, `update` and `delete`.
- The permissions on fields of the query result are filtered by `read` ability.
- Rule conditions are automatically applied via `accessibleBy` and if `include` or `select` are used, this will even be applied to the nested relations.
- Mutating queries will throw errors in a similar format as CASL. `It's not allowed to "update" "email" on "User"`.
- On nested `connect`, `disconnect`, `upsert` or `connectOrCreate` mutation queries the client assumes an `update` action for insertion or connection.
- `update` and `create` are wrapped into a transaction, since `create` abilities will be checked on result of mutation and if it was not allowed the transaction will revert the creation. This limits client transactions to interactive transactions only. Sequential transactions are not supported.
- optionally add options to `useCaslAbilities`. Add `permissionField` to it to get an array of crud rights of the queried model: `['create', 'read', 'update', 'delete']` and add additional Actions via `addPermissionActions`, which can be used to check abilities client-side conveniently without all the necessary relation queries
### Examples
Now how does it work?
```ts
function builderFactory() {
const builder = abilityBuilder();
const { can } = builder;
can("read", "Post", {
thread: {
creatorId: 0,
},
});
can("read", "Thread", "id");
return builder;
}
const caslClient = prismaClient.$extends(
useCaslAbilities(builderFactory, "casl")
);
const result = await caslClient.post.findMany({
include: {
thread: true,
},
});
/**
* creates a query under the hood with assistance of @casl/prisma
*
*{
* where: {
* AND: [{
* OR: [{
* thread: {
* creatorId: 0
* }
* }]
* }]
* }
* include: {
* thread: true
* }
*
* and result will be filtered and should look like
* { id: 0, threadId: 0, thread: { id: 0 }, casl: ['read'] }
*/
```
Why do we create this builder factory function? It allows us to alter the rules on the client. Let's try with our above client:
```ts
const result = await caslClient
.$casl((extend) => {
extend.cannot("read", "Post");
return extend;
})
.post.findMany({
include: {
thread: true,
},
}); // will throw an error, since we added an additional cannot rule to post!
```
Mutations will only run, if abilities allow it.
```ts
function builderFactory() {
const builder = abilityBuilder();
const { can, build } = builder;
can("update", "Post");
cannot("update", "Post", "text");
return builder;
}
const caslClient = prismaClient.$extends(useCaslAbilities(builderFactory));
const result = await caslClient.post.update({
data: { text: "-" },
where: { id: 0 },
});
/**
* will throw an error
* because update on text is not allowed
*/
```
Check out tests for some other examples.
### Debugging queries
To debug queries add `debugCasl: true` to the query like this `caslClient.post.findUnique({ debugCasl: true })`
### Limitations and Constraints
#### NEEDS TO BE THE LAST EXTENSION
Since Prisma does not allow properly transfering a transaction from one extension to another, this extension needs to be the last.
To allow adding functionality like RLS to a transaction use the following options:
```ts
const caslClient = prismaClient.$extends(
useCaslAbilities(builderFactory, {
beforeQuery: (tx) => {
tx.$executeRaw`SELECT set_config('app.current_user', ${userId}, TRUE)`;
return;
},
afterQuery: (tx) => {
// some other logic
return;
},
})
);
```
#### Sequential transactions are not supported
#### Avoid columns with prisma naming
When using prisma probably no one will use columns named `data`, `create`, `update`, `select` or `where`. However, if this should be the case, then this library most probably won't work.
#### Filtering properties happens in prisma extension and not on database
A prisma query should result in the queried data with only permitted fields.
Since conditional filtering of fields cannot be done within a database query by prisma, the extension does this after querying the data. However, to get permitted fields per queried data, all the fields mentioned in rule conditions need to be available to, within the extension. Therefore the extension gathers all the necessary fields even if no `read` rights exist for them. The query itself and the data might be large and performance slower than a simple query, but now we can apply the CASL abilities to remove all restricted fields. Within this process we also remove all the additional queried data, so that the final result represents permittedd data of the actual prisma query.
```ts
can("read", "User", "email", {
posts: {
some: {
authorId: 0,
}
},
});
cannot('read', 'Post') // !!! we cannot read post
const result = client.user.findMany();
console.log(result) // [{ email: "-" }]
/**
* internally this query is used:
*
* {
* where: {
* AND: [{
* OR: [{
* posts: { some: { authorId: 0 } }
* }]
* }]
* },
* include: { posts: { select: { authorId: true } } }
* }
* /
```
Here are some performance metrics for the above query for the small test sqlite db:
- plain prisma query: **0.56225**
- casl prisma query: **3.33416**
- create abilities: **0.18987**
- enrich query with casl: **0.09284**
- prisma query: **2.97764**
- filtering query results: **0.07380**
#### Nested fields and wildcards are not supported / tested
`can('read', 'User', ['nested.field', 'field.*'])` probably won't work.
#### Combined relation fields are not supported
`entry Relation @relation(fields: [entryIdA, entryIdB], references: [refA, refB])` does not work.
`entry Relation @relation(fields: [entryId], references: [ref])` does work.
Since internally a relation like `entryId: someId` might be replaced by `entry: { connect: { ref: someId, ...caslConditions } }`