oneie
Version:
Build apps, websites, and AI agents in English. Zero-interaction setup for AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf). Download to your computer, run in the cloud, deploy to the edge. Open source and free forever.
935 lines (699 loc) • 30.4 kB
Markdown
---
title: Unified Implementation Plan
dimension: things
category: plans
tags: architecture, backend, connections, events, groups, knowledge, ontology, people, things
related_dimensions: connections, events, groups, knowledge, people
scope: global
created: 2025-11-03
updated: 2025-11-03
version: 1.0.0
ai_context: |
This document is part of the things dimension in the plans category.
Location: one/things/plans/unified-implementation-plan.md
Purpose: Documents unified implementation plan: backend-agnostic + complete ontology
Related dimensions: connections, events, groups, knowledge, people
For AI agents: Read this to understand unified implementation plan.
---
# Unified Implementation Plan: Backend-Agnostic + Complete Ontology
**Status:** ✅ Phases 1-2 Complete | 🚧 Phases 3-7 In Progress
**Version:** 2.1.0
**Date Updated:** 2025-10-18
**Goal:** Achieve complete ontology implementation with backend-agnostic architecture
---
## 🎯 Current Status Summary
### ✅ COMPLETED (Phases 1-2: 4 weeks)
**Phase 1: Foundation** ✅
- DataProvider interface (6 dimensions) - `/web/src/providers/DataProvider.ts`
- ConvexProvider implementation
- Typed errors (ThingNotFoundError, etc.)
- Backend swapping with ONE line change
**Phase 2: Service Layer** ✅
- ThingService (handles all 66 types generically) - `/web/src/services/ThingService.ts`
- ConnectionService (all 25 types) - `/web/src/services/ConnectionService.ts`
- EventService (all 67 events) - `/web/src/services/EventService.ts`
- KnowledgeService (RAG foundation) - `/web/src/services/KnowledgeService.ts`
- GroupService (hierarchical groups with nesting) - `/web/src/services/GroupService.ts`
- PeopleService - `/web/src/services/PeopleService.ts`
- React hooks (useEffectRunner) - `/web/src/hooks/`
- Typed errors throughout
- Dependency injection via Effect.ts
**Backend Schema** ✅
- 6-dimension ontology complete - `/backend/convex/schema.ts`
- groups table (hierarchical nesting)
- entities table (66+ thing types via generic `type` field)
- connections table (25+ relationship types)
- events table (67+ event types)
- knowledge table (RAG + vectors)
- thingKnowledge junction table
### 🚧 REMAINING (Phases 3-7: 7 weeks)
**Phase 3: Backend Implementation** (Weeks 5-8) - 🔴 NOT STARTED
- [ ] Implement CRUD mutations for all 66 thing types
- [ ] Add event logging to all mutations
- [ ] Enforce group scoping
- [ ] Add rate limiting
- [ ] Write unit tests
**Phase 4: Frontend Integration** (Weeks 9-10) - 🔴 NOT STARTED
- [ ] Multi-tenant dashboard
- [ ] Entity management UI (all 66 types)
- [ ] Connection visualization
- [ ] Real-time event timeline
- [ ] Real-time stats
**Phase 5: RAG & Knowledge** (Week 10) - 🔴 NOT STARTED
- [ ] Chunking service (800 tokens, 200 overlap)
- [ ] Embedding service (OpenAI integration)
- [ ] RAG ingestion pipeline
- [ ] Vector search
- [ ] Knowledge labels
**Phase 6: Testing** (Week 10) - 🟡 PARTIAL
- [x] Auth tests (50+ test cases) - `/test/auth/`
- [ ] Backend service coverage (90%)
- [ ] Frontend coverage (70%)
- [ ] Multi-backend tests
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline
**Phase 7: Multi-Backend** (Week 11) - 🔴 NOT STARTED (Optional)
- [ ] WordPressProvider
- [ ] SupabaseProvider
- [ ] CompositeProvider (multi-backend routing)
### 📊 Progress Metrics
| Metric | Target | Current | Status |
| --------------------------- | ------------ | ---------- | ------ |
| **Architecture Complete** | 100% | 100% | ✅ |
| **Service Layer Complete** | 100% | 100% | ✅ |
| **Backend CRUD Operations** | 100% | 10% | 🔴 |
| **Frontend UI Complete** | 100% | 20% | 🔴 |
| **RAG Implementation** | 100% | 0% | 🔴 |
| **Test Coverage** | 90% | 50% | 🟡 |
| **Multi-Backend Support** | 2+ providers | 1 (Convex) | 🟡 |
**Overall: 36% Complete** (4 of 11 weeks)
### 🎯 Next Cycle (Cycle 101)
**Start Phase 3: Backend Implementation - Week 5**
Task: Implement CRUD mutations for Priority 1 entity types (core entities)
- Create mutations using ThingService (backend-agnostic)
- Add event logging automatically
- Enforce group scoping
- Add rate limiting
Entity types to implement (Priority 1 - Core):
1. creator
2. ai_clone
3. audience_member
4. organization (thing type for multi-tenant organizations)
**Estimated Time:** 3-4 days
**Risk:** Low (pattern is clear, just replication)
---
## Executive Summary: Two Plans, One Vision
After analyzing both `separate.md` (backend-agnostic architecture) and `improve-codebase.md` (complete ontology implementation), the answer is clear:
**✅ YES - Both plans improve the codebase AND must be implemented together.**
### Why Both Plans Are Essential
**Problem if you implement `improve-codebase.md` alone:**
- You build 66 thing types tightly coupled to Convex
- No backend flexibility
- Organizations locked into Convex
- Future migration becomes 10x harder
**Problem if you implement `separate.md` alone:**
- You have a beautiful architecture with no features
- DataProvider wraps incomplete backend
- Can't demonstrate multi-backend capability
- No production value
**Solution: Unified Implementation**
- Implement DataProvider architecture FIRST (separate.md)
- Build all 66 thing types USING DataProvider (improve-codebase.md)
- Result: Complete ontology + Backend flexibility
---
## The Critical Insight
### ❌ Wrong Sequence (What NOT to Do)
```
Week 1-4: Implement 66 thing types in Convex mutations
Week 5-6: Add Effect.ts glue layer
Week 7-10: Migrate to DataProvider architecture
Result: Wasted 6 weeks building tightly-coupled code, then refactoring it
```
### ✅ Right Sequence (The Unified Plan)
```
Week 1-2: Implement DataProvider interface + ConvexProvider
Week 3-4: Create Effect.ts services using DataProvider
Week 5-8: Implement all 66 thing types through services
Week 9-10: Add multi-tenant UI and RAG
Week 11: Add alternative backend (prove flexibility)
Result: Everything built right the first time
```
---
## Unified Architecture
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ FRONTEND (Astro + React) │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Multi-Tenant UI (improve-codebase.md) │ │
│ │ - Group hierarchy navigation │ │
│ │ - Entity management for all 66 types │ │
│ │ - Connection visualization │ │
│ │ - Real-time event timeline │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Effect.ts Services (both plans) │ │
│ │ - ThingService (all 66 types) │ │
│ │ - ConnectionService (all 25 types) │ │
│ │ - EventService (all 67 events) │ │
│ │ - KnowledgeService (RAG + embeddings) │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ DataProvider Interface (separate.md) │ │
│ │ - Backend-agnostic API │ │
│ │ - groups, people, things, connections, events, knowledge│ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ BACKEND PROVIDERS (separate.md) │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Convex │ │ WordPress │ │ Supabase │ │
│ │ (default) │ │ (blog) │ │ (analytics) │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ACTUAL BACKEND DATABASES (improve-codebase.md) │
│ │
│ Convex: 6 tables with complete CRUD for all types │
│ - groups, entities, connections, events, knowledge │
│ - All 66 thing types supported │
│ - All 25 connection types supported │
│ - All 67 event types logged │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
---
## Phase-by-Phase Implementation (11 Weeks)
### Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-2) ✅ COMPLETE
**Goal:** Backend-agnostic architecture in place
**From separate.md:**
- [x] Create DataProvider interface (6 dimensions) ✅ DONE
- [x] Implement ConvexProvider (wraps existing backend) ✅ DONE
- [x] Add typed errors (ThingNotFoundError, etc.) ✅ DONE
- [x] Configure in astro.config.ts ✅ DONE
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [x] DataProvider interface complete with TypeScript types ✅
- [x] ConvexProvider implements all methods ✅
- [x] Existing auth tests pass unchanged ✅
- [x] Can swap backends by changing ONE line ✅
**Actual Effort:** 16 hours (2 days)
**Actual Risk:** Low (completed without issues)
**Location:** `/web/src/providers/DataProvider.ts`
---
### Phase 2: Service Layer (Weeks 3-4) ✅ COMPLETE
**Goal:** Effect.ts services using DataProvider
**From both plans:**
- [x] Create Effect.ts services for all 6 dimensions ✅ DONE
- [x] ThingService (handles all 66 types generically) ✅ DONE
- [x] ConnectionService (all 25 types) ✅ DONE
- [x] EventService (all 67 events) ✅ DONE
- [x] KnowledgeService (RAG foundation) ✅ DONE
- [x] Create useEffectRunner hook for React ✅ DONE
**From improve-codebase.md:**
- [x] Implement typed errors (tagged unions) ✅ DONE
- [x] Service composition via Layer.mergeAll ✅ DONE
- [x] Dependency injection ✅ DONE
- [x] Error handling without try/catch ✅ DONE
**Example:**
```typescript
// Backend-agnostic ThingService
export class ThingService extends Effect.Service<ThingService>()({
effect: Effect.gen(function* () {
const provider = yield* DataProvider // Works with ANY backend!
return {
create: (type: ThingType, input: any) =>
Effect.gen(function* () {
// 1. Validate (same for all backends)
yield* validateThingInput(type, input)
// 2. Create via provider (backend-specific)
const thingId = yield* provider.things.create({
type,
name: input.name,
groupId: input.groupId,
properties: input.properties
})
// 3. Log event (via provider)
yield* provider.events.log({
type: "entity_created",
actorId: input.actorId,
targetId: thingId,
groupId: input.groupId,
metadata: { thingType: type }
})
return thingId
})
}
}),
dependencies: [DataProvider]
})
```
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [x] All services use DataProvider (no direct backend calls) ✅
- [x] Services work with any backend that implements DataProvider ✅
- [x] Typed errors throughout ✅
- [ ] 90% test coverage with mocked providers ⚠️ PARTIAL
**Actual Effort:** 32 hours (4 days)
**Actual Risk:** Low (completed successfully)
**Location:** `/web/src/services/`
---
### Phase 3: Backend Implementation (Weeks 5-8)
**Goal:** Complete CRUD for all 66 thing types
**From improve-codebase.md (but using DataProvider!):**
**Week 5: Core Entities (Priority 1)**
- [ ] Creator, AI Clone, Audience Member, Organization
- [ ] Convex mutations use services (thin wrappers)
- [ ] Event logging automatic
- [ ] Group scoping enforced
**Week 6: Content & Products (Priority 2)**
- [ ] Blog posts, courses, lessons, videos, podcasts
- [ ] Products, memberships, digital goods
- [ ] Content lifecycle (draft → published → archived)
**Week 7: Tokens, Agents & AI (Priority 3 & 4)**
- [ ] Tokens, token contracts
- [ ] 10 business agents (strategy, marketing, sales, etc.)
- [ ] External agents, workflows
**Week 8: Auth, Knowledge & Remaining (Priority 5)**
- [ ] Sessions, OAuth accounts, verification tokens
- [ ] Knowledge items, embeddings
- [ ] Metrics, insights, predictions
- [ ] Notifications, campaigns
**Key Difference from improve-codebase.md:**
```typescript
// ❌ OLD WAY (improve-codebase.md alone - tightly coupled)
export const createCourse = mutation({
handler: async (ctx, args) => {
// Direct Convex DB calls
const courseId = await ctx.db.insert("entities", { ... })
await ctx.db.insert("events", { ... })
return courseId
}
})
// ✅ NEW WAY (unified plan - backend-agnostic)
export const createCourse = mutation({
handler: async (ctx, args) => {
// Use service via DataProvider
const program = Effect.gen(function* () {
const courseService = yield* CourseService
return yield* courseService.create(args)
})
return await Effect.runPromise(
program.pipe(Effect.provide(ServicesLayer))
)
}
})
```
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] All 66 thing types have CRUD operations
- [ ] All mutations use services (not direct DB)
- [ ] All operations log events
- [ ] Group scoping enforced
- [ ] Works with ConvexProvider
**Effort:** 120 hours (15 days across 4 weeks)
**Risk:** Low (following established patterns)
---
### Phase 4: Frontend Integration (Weeks 9-10)
**Goal:** Multi-tenant UI for complete ontology
**From improve-codebase.md:**
- [ ] Multi-tenant dashboard with group hierarchy
- [ ] Entity management UI (all 66 types)
- [ ] Connection visualization (graph view)
- [ ] Real-time event timeline
- [ ] Real-time stats and analytics
**Using DataProvider (from separate.md):**
```tsx
// Frontend components are backend-agnostic!
export function CreateCourseForm() {
const { run, loading } = useEffectRunner();
const handleSubmit = async (data: CourseData) => {
const program = Effect.gen(function* () {
const courseService = yield* CourseService;
// This works with ANY backend (Convex, WordPress, etc.)
return yield* courseService.create("course", data);
});
const courseId = await run(program);
navigate(`/courses/${courseId}`);
};
return <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>...</form>;
}
```
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Group selector with full hierarchy
- [ ] Entity forms for all 66 types
- [ ] Real-time updates via subscriptions
- [ ] Connection graph visualization
- [ ] Event timeline with filtering
- [ ] Role-based access control
**Effort:** 64 hours (8 days)
**Risk:** Medium (complex UI)
---
### Phase 5: RAG & Knowledge (Week 10)
**Goal:** Complete knowledge implementation
**From improve-codebase.md:**
- [ ] Chunking service (800 tokens, 200 overlap)
- [ ] Embedding service (OpenAI integration)
- [ ] RAG ingestion pipeline
- [ ] Vector search
- [ ] Knowledge labels
**Using DataProvider:**
```typescript
// RAG works with any backend that supports vector storage
export const ingestThing = (thingId: string) =>
Effect.gen(function* () {
const provider = yield* DataProvider;
const chunking = yield* ChunkingService;
const embedding = yield* EmbeddingService;
// Get thing (from any backend)
const thing = yield* provider.things.get(thingId);
// Extract and chunk text
const chunks = yield* chunking.chunk(thing.properties.content);
// Embed chunks
const embeddings = yield* embedding.embedBatch(chunks.map((c) => c.text));
// Store via provider (backend-agnostic!)
for (let i = 0; i < chunks.length; i++) {
yield* provider.knowledge.create({
groupId: thing.groupId,
knowledgeType: "chunk",
text: chunks[i].text,
embedding: embeddings[i].embedding,
sourceThingId: thingId,
});
}
});
```
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Chunking handles 66 thing types
- [ ] Embeddings work via provider
- [ ] Vector search returns relevant results
- [ ] Knowledge labels for categorization
**Effort:** 32 hours (4 days)
**Risk:** Medium (OpenAI API integration)
---
### Phase 6: Testing (Week 10)
**Goal:** Comprehensive test coverage
**From improve-codebase.md:**
- [ ] 90% backend service coverage
- [ ] All 66 thing types tested
- [ ] All 25 connection types tested
- [ ] All 67 event types verified
**From separate.md:**
- [ ] Mock providers for testing
- [ ] Provider swapping tests
- [ ] Multi-backend tests
- [ ] Auth tests pass (critical!)
**Example:**
```typescript
// Test with multiple providers!
describe("ThingService", () => {
const testWithProvider = (providerName: string, provider: Layer<DataProvider>) => {
it(`should create thing via ${providerName}`, async () => {
const program = Effect.gen(function* () {
const thingService = yield* ThingService
const thingId = yield* thingService.create("course", { ... })
expect(thingId).toBeDefined()
})
await Effect.runPromise(
program.pipe(Effect.provide(provider))
)
})
}
testWithProvider("Convex", ConvexProviderMock)
testWithProvider("Supabase", SupabaseProviderMock)
testWithProvider("WordPress", WordPressProviderMock)
})
```
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] 90% backend coverage
- [ ] 70% frontend coverage
- [ ] Tests pass with multiple providers
- [ ] All auth tests pass
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline green
**Effort:** 40 hours (5 days)
**Risk:** Low (testing infrastructure exists)
---
### Phase 7: Multi-Backend (Week 11 - Optional)
**Goal:** Prove true backend flexibility
**From separate.md:**
- [ ] Implement WordPressProvider
- [ ] Implement SupabaseProvider
- [ ] Implement CompositeProvider (multi-backend)
**Real-World Example:**
```typescript
// astro.config.ts - Mix and match backends!
export default defineConfig({
integrations: [
one({
provider: compositeProvider({
default: convexProvider({ url: env.PUBLIC_CONVEX_URL }),
routes: {
// Blog from WordPress
blog_post: wordpressProvider({
url: "https://blog.yoursite.com",
apiKey: env.WP_API_KEY,
}),
// Products from Shopify
product: shopifyProvider({
store: "yourstore.myshopify.com",
token: env.SHOPIFY_TOKEN,
}),
// Analytics from Supabase
metric: supabaseProvider({
url: env.SUPABASE_URL,
key: env.SUPABASE_KEY,
}),
},
}),
}),
],
});
```
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] At least 2 alternative providers working
- [ ] CompositeProvider routes correctly
- [ ] Frontend works unchanged
- [ ] Can swap backends with ONE line
**Effort:** 40 hours (5 days)
**Risk:** Low (proves concept, not critical path)
---
## Comparison: Separate vs Unified Plans
| Aspect | improve-codebase.md alone | separate.md alone | Unified Plan |
| ----------------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| **Timeline** | 14 weeks | 6 weeks | 11 weeks |
| **Backend Flexibility** | ❌ None (Convex only) | ✅ Full (any backend) | ✅ Full (any backend) |
| **Ontology Coverage** | ✅ Complete (66 types) | ⚠️ Partial (demo only) | ✅ Complete (66 types) |
| **Effect.ts Services** | ✅ Full | ✅ Full | ✅ Full |
| **Multi-Tenant UI** | ✅ Complete | ❌ Missing | ✅ Complete |
| **RAG Implementation** | ✅ Complete | ❌ Missing | ✅ Complete |
| **Future Refactoring** | ❌ 6 weeks to add flexibility | ✅ None needed | ✅ None needed |
| **Risk** | Medium (tight coupling) | Low (architecture only) | Low (build right first time) |
| **Production Value** | ✅ High | ⚠️ Low (no features) | ✅ Very High |
**Winner:** Unified Plan
- Faster than improve-codebase.md alone (11 weeks vs 14 weeks)
- More valuable than separate.md alone (complete features)
- No future refactoring needed
- Built right the first time
---
## Critical Success Factors
### 1. Architecture First (Week 1-2)
**DO NOT SKIP:** Implement DataProvider before building features
```typescript
// ❌ WRONG - Build features first, refactor later
Week 1: Build createCourse mutation directly in Convex
Week 8: Try to wrap in DataProvider → painful refactoring
// ✅ RIGHT - Architecture first
Week 1: Create DataProvider interface
Week 2: Implement ConvexProvider
Week 3: Build createCourse using ThingService + DataProvider
Week 8: Add WordPressProvider → just works, no refactoring
```
### 2. Test at Every Phase
**From separate.md:** Auth tests MUST pass after each phase
```bash
# After Phase 1 (DataProvider)
npm test frontend/tests/auth/
# All tests should pass
# After Phase 2 (Services)
npm test frontend/tests/auth/
# All tests should pass
# After Phase 5 (Frontend migration)
npm test frontend/tests/auth/
# All tests should pass
```
### 3. Services Use DataProvider (Not Direct Backend)
**From improve-codebase.md:** Effect.ts services with typed errors
**From separate.md:** Services use DataProvider interface
```typescript
// ✅ RIGHT - Service uses DataProvider
export class ThingService {
create = (type, input) =>
Effect.gen(function* () {
const provider = yield* DataProvider; // Backend-agnostic!
return yield* provider.things.create({ type, ...input });
});
}
// ❌ WRONG - Service calls Convex directly
export class ThingService {
create = (type, input) =>
Effect.gen(function* () {
const ctx = yield* ConvexContext; // Tightly coupled!
return yield* Effect.tryPromise(() =>
ctx.db.insert("entities", { type, ...input }),
);
});
}
```
---
## Migration from Current State
### Current State Analysis
```
✅ Working:
- Groups CRUD (mutations + queries)
- Connections CRUD (mutations + queries)
- Auth (Better Auth + tests passing)
- Schema (6-dimension ontology defined)
⚠️ Partial:
- Only 2 of 66 thing types implemented
- No Effect.ts layer
- No DataProvider abstraction
- Frontend tightly coupled to Convex
❌ Missing:
- 64 thing types
- RAG implementation
- Multi-tenant UI
- Protocol integration
- Alternative backends
```
### Migration Path
```
Phase 1-2: Add abstraction layer (DataProvider + Services)
└─> Wraps existing groups/connections
└─> Auth tests still pass
└─> Zero functionality lost
Phase 3-4: Fill in missing 64 thing types
└─> Use DataProvider (not direct Convex)
└─> Built right the first time
Phase 5-6: Add UI and RAG
└─> Uses services (backend-agnostic)
Phase 7: Prove flexibility with alternative backend
└─> Demonstrates the value of architecture
```
---
## Effort Summary
| Phase | Weeks | Hours | From Plan | Risk |
| --------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------------------- | -------------- |
| 1. DataProvider | 2 | 16 | separate.md | Low |
| 2. Services | 2 | 32 | both | Medium |
| 3. Backend (66 types) | 4 | 120 | improve-codebase.md | Low |
| 4. Frontend UI | 2 | 64 | improve-codebase.md | Medium |
| 5. RAG + Testing | 1 | 72 | improve-codebase.md | Medium |
| 6. Multi-Backend | 1 | 40 | separate.md | Low |
| **TOTAL** | **11** | **344** | **Unified** | **Low-Medium** |
**Comparison:**
- improve-codebase.md alone: 14 weeks, 592 hours, tight coupling
- separate.md alone: 6 weeks, no features
- **Unified plan: 11 weeks, 344 hours, complete + flexible**
**Savings:**
- 3 weeks faster than improve-codebase.md
- Zero refactoring needed later
- Built right the first time
---
## Decision Matrix
### Should You Implement This?
**Implement Unified Plan If:**
- ✅ You need backend flexibility for customer acquisition
- ✅ You want complete ontology implementation (66 types)
- ✅ You can dedicate 11 weeks to strategic work
- ✅ You want to avoid future refactoring
- ✅ You want multi-backend support (Convex + WordPress + Supabase)
**Wait If:**
- ⚠️ You have urgent features to ship (< 4 weeks deadline)
- ⚠️ Current Convex-only setup meets all needs
- ⚠️ No customers requesting alternative backends
- ⚠️ Team unfamiliar with Effect.ts (need training first)
**Never Do (Anti-Patterns):**
- ❌ Implement improve-codebase.md without DataProvider
- ❌ Skip Phase 1-2 and build features directly in Convex
- ❌ Mix backend-specific code in services
- ❌ Build UI before services exist
---
## Success Metrics
**Technical Completeness:**
- [ ] 66/66 thing types implemented
- [ ] 25/25 connection types implemented
- [ ] 67/67 event types logged
- [ ] DataProvider interface complete
- [ ] 2+ backend providers working
- [ ] 90% test coverage
**Architecture Quality:**
- [ ] Services use DataProvider (no direct backend)
- [ ] Can swap backends with ONE line change
- [ ] Effect.ts services have typed errors
- [ ] Zero try/catch in business logic
- [ ] Clear separation: frontend → services → provider → backend
**Production Readiness:**
- [ ] Multi-tenant UI complete
- [ ] RAG pipeline working
- [ ] Auth tests passing
- [ ] Real-time subscriptions working
- [ ] Group hierarchy navigation
- [ ] Role-based access control
**Business Value:**
- [ ] Can onboard WordPress customers
- [ ] Can onboard Supabase customers
- [ ] Can support hybrid backends
- [ ] Platform-agnostic (frontend works with any backend)
- [ ] Zero vendor lock-in
---
## Conclusion
### The Answer to Your Question
**"Does improve-codebase.md match separate.md? Do they improve both?"**
**YES and NO:**
✅ **YES, they complement each other perfectly:**
- separate.md provides the architecture (DataProvider)
- improve-codebase.md provides the features (66 types)
- Together they create a complete, flexible platform
❌ **NO, they don't match in isolation:**
- improve-codebase.md alone = complete but inflexible
- separate.md alone = flexible but incomplete
- You need BOTH to achieve the vision
### The Unified Plan is the Answer
**What it gives you:**
1. **Complete Ontology** (from improve-codebase.md)
- All 66 thing types
- All 25 connection types
- All 67 event types
- Full RAG implementation
- Multi-tenant UI
2. **Backend Flexibility** (from separate.md)
- DataProvider interface
- Support ANY backend
- Multi-backend federation
- Zero vendor lock-in
- Progressive migration path
3. **Best Practices** (from both)
- Effect.ts services
- Typed errors
- Service composition
- Dependency injection
- Comprehensive testing
**Timeline:** 11 weeks (faster than either plan alone)
**Effort:** 344 hours (less than improve-codebase.md alone)
**Risk:** Low-Medium (architecture first, build right once)
**Value:** Complete + Flexible (the best of both plans)
---
## Next Steps
1. **Review this unified plan** with team
2. **Commit to architecture-first** approach (Phases 1-2)
3. **Allocate 11 weeks** for implementation
4. **Start Phase 1** immediately: DataProvider interface
5. **Do NOT build features** before DataProvider exists
**Golden Rule:**
```
Build the architecture right.
Build features once.
Never refactor for flexibility.
```
The unified plan achieves all goals from both source plans while being faster and less risky than either one alone.
**This is the way.**