UNPKG

major-ai-skills

Version:

Installable agentic skills / AI agent skills (SKILL.md) for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI & Antigravity - 402+ professional app, token-efficiency, and common-sense skills. SEO/GEO ready.

120 lines (92 loc) 5.79 kB
--- name: ask-ai-to-repeat-understanding description: "Restate the intended outcome, scope, and constraints when a complex task needs an alignment check." category: common-sense risk: safe source: self source_type: self date_added: "2026-08-26" tags: ["alignment", "intent-paraphrasing", "planning", "scope-management", "clarity", "prompt-engineering"] tools: ["claude", "cursor", "gemini", "codex", "chatgpt"] --- # Ask AI to Confirm Understanding Before Execution (AI Skill) ## Overview On complex, high-stakes tasks (e.g., refactoring an entire module, summarizing a 50-page contract, or structuring a quarterly campaign), leaping straight into execution often results in 1,500 tokens of output that solved the wrong problem or violated an unstated constraint. This skill introduces the **Echo-Back & Intent Alignment Protocol**: a simple gatekeeping mechanism that forces the AI to summarize its interpretation of the goal, constraints, and scope *before* writing a single line of deliverable content. --- ## The Intent Alignment Gate ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ The 2-Phase Execution Gate User Complex Prompt ──► [ GATE: Echo & Plan ] ┌──────────────┴──────────────┐ Misalignment Detected? 100% Aligned? Adjust in 1 sentence Execute Full Solution (Saves 90% wasted time) with Zero Errors └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` --- ## Master Alignment Prompt Templates ### Pattern 1: The Pre-Execution Alignment Gate (High-Stakes Tasks) ```markdown I have a complex task for you: [PASTE PROJECT DETAILS / REQUIREMENTS]. DO NOT generate the final deliverable yet. First, respond with a concise "Intent Alignment Summary" containing: 1. **Primary Goal**: In 1-2 sentences, what is the core outcome you need to achieve? 2. **Key Constraints**: What are the strict limitations, formats, and rules you must follow? 3. **In-Scope vs. Out-of-Scope**: What will you build vs. what will you explicitly leave untouched? 4. **Assumptions**: What are you assuming about my requirements that wasn't explicitly stated? Conclude by asking: "Shall I proceed with execution?" ``` --- ### Pattern 2: The Fast "In-Line Echo" (Medium Tasks) For faster, single-turn tasks where you still want visible alignment: ```markdown Generate [DELIVERABLE] based on [INPUT]. Before providing your final answer, begin with a 2-line "Target Alignment" block confirming your understanding of the audience, tone, and main constraint. ``` --- ## Real-World Case Studies ### Example 1: Database Migration & Schema Refactoring #### Risky Direct Prompt > **User**: *"Migrate our MongoDB user schemas to PostgreSQL relational tables. Here are 12 JSON schemas..."* > > *AI immediately generates 400 lines of SQL, creating flat tables with `jsonb` columns everywhere, completely ignoring normalized relations and indexing.* #### Alignment Gate Prompt > **User**: *"Before writing SQL, summarize how you plan to map the nested JSON arrays (e.g., user addresses and payment methods) into PostgreSQL tables."* > > **AI Response**: > **Intent Alignment**: > 1. **Primary Goal**: Convert MongoDB document collections into normalized PostgreSQL 16 schemas. > 2. **Mapping Plan**: > - `user.addresses` $\rightarrow$ Separate `user_addresses` table with `user_id` foreign key. > - `user.payment_methods` $\rightarrow$ Separate `payment_methods` table linked via `user_id`. > - `user.metadata` $\rightarrow$ Native `JSONB` column inside the `users` table. > 3. **Assumptions**: Using UUIDv4 primary keys and `ON DELETE CASCADE` for child tables. > > *Shall I generate the migration script based on this architecture?* > > **User**: *"Make foreign keys `ON DELETE RESTRICT` instead of cascade, then proceed."* (Saved 20 minutes of code editing). --- ### Example 2: Executive Summary of Technical RFC > **User Prompt**: > *"Before drafting the summary of this 40-page Kubernetes migration RFC for our CFO, tell me the 3 financial metrics you will highlight."* > > **AI Alignment Response**: > 1. **Compute Cost Reductions**: Moving from static EC2 instances to Karpenter-managed EKS spot autoscaling (projected ~35% annual savings). > 2. **Migration CapEx**: 3-month transition tooling and third-party consultant costs ($85,000). > 3. **Risk Mitigation ROI**: Reduced outage risk, avoiding historical downtime costs averaging $18,000/hr. > > *Is this financial emphasis aligned with your CFO's current focus?* --- ## Alignment Checklist | Dimension | Question to Verify | | :--- | :--- | | **Objective** | Is the AI solving the real root problem or just a symptom? | | **Scope** | Is the AI trying to do too much (or too little)? | | **Constraints** | Did the model remember word limits, file paths, libraries, or banned tokens? | | **Assumptions** | Did the model make assumptions about versions, environments, or audience? |