UNPKG

major-ai-skills

Version:

Installable agentic skills / AI agent skills (SKILL.md) for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI & Antigravity - 402+ professional app, token-efficiency, and common-sense skills. SEO/GEO ready.

97 lines (71 loc) 4.84 kB
--- name: summarize-meetings-into-decisions description: "Extract decisions, rationale, owners, and unresolved questions from a meeting transcript." category: common-sense risk: safe source: self source_type: self date_added: "2026-08-26" tags: ["meeting-summaries", "decision-records", "executive-brief", "transcript-parsing", "productivity", "prompt-engineering"] tools: ["claude", "cursor", "gemini", "codex", "chatgpt"] --- # Summarize Meetings into Decisions (Decision Log Extraction) (AI Skill) ## Overview When asked to summarize a 45-minute meeting transcript, standard AI outputs create a chronological play-by-play (*"First, Sarah presented the Q3 slide deck. Then Mark asked about pricing. Then Sarah replied that pricing was under review..."*). This chronological narrative is nearly useless for executives and team members who weren't in the room. What matters are **the final decisions agreed upon, the rationale behind them, and who is accountable for execution**. The **Decision Log Extraction Protocol** filters out conversational chatter and formats the meeting into an **Architecture / Executive Decision Record (ADR)**. --- ## Chronological Narrative vs. Decision Record ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ Transcript Processing Models Chronological Narrative (Low Value): 4 pages of "Bob said this, then Alice disagreed..." High reading fatigue, impossible to find final agreements│ Decision Record (High Value): [DECISION 1]: What was decided & why [OPTIONS REJECTED]: What was eliminated & why [ACTION ASSIGNMENTS]: [Owner] + [Task] + [Deadline] └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` --- ## Master Decision Record Prompt Templates ### Pattern 1: The Executive Decision Record (ADR) Use for product, strategy, and leadership meetings: ```markdown Analyze the attached meeting transcript: [ATTACH TRANSCRIPT / PASTE TEXT]. Do NOT write a chronological timeline of who spoke. Extract a structured **Executive Decision Record**: ### 🎯 1. Key Decisions Made For each decision, format as: - **Decision**: [Clear 1-sentence statement of what was approved] - **Rationale**: [Why this option won over alternatives] - **Trade-off / Cost**: [What we are giving up or spending] ### 🚫 2. Options Explicitly Rejected - [Option Name]: [Why the team decided NOT to proceed with this path] ### ⚡ 3. Accountable Action Items | Task | Owner | Due Date | Definition of Done | ``` --- ## Real-World Case Study ### Scenario: Product Team Pricing Sync #### Chronological AI Output (Rambling) > *"The meeting began at 2 PM. Dave suggested increasing enterprise pricing by 20%. Lisa expressed concern that existing customers might churn. Mark mentioned that our churn rate is currently 1.8%. After some back-and-forth discussion regarding grandfathering policies, the team decided to increase new customer pricing..."* #### Decision Record Output (Instant Clarity) ### 🎯 1. Key Decisions Made - **Decision**: Increase Enterprise Tier pricing by **20% (from $500/mo to $600/mo)** for all new signups starting September 1st. - **Rationale**: Competitor benchmarks show we are 35% underpriced; low churn rate (1.8%) demonstrates strong price tolerance. - **Grandfathering Policy**: All existing customers remain on legacy $500/mo pricing for 12 months. ### 🚫 2. Options Explicitly Rejected - **Immediate Price Hike for Existing Customers**: Rejected due to risk of relationship damage with long-term champion accounts. ### ⚡ 3. Accountable Action Items | Task | Owner | Due Date | Definition of Done | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Update Stripe Pricing Table** | Dave | Aug 25 | New $600/mo pricing tier live on staging. | | **Draft Grandfathering FAQ Email** | Lisa | Aug 20 | Customer update email reviewed and approved. | --- ## Summary Best Practices - **Ban "Who said what"**: Explicitly prompt *"Focus on team consensus and final decisions, not individual speech chronologies."* - **Always record rejected options**: Capturing *why* an alternative was killed prevents the team from debating the exact same idea again 3 months later.