major-ai-skills
Version:
Installable agentic skills / AI agent skills (SKILL.md) for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI & Antigravity - 402+ professional app, token-efficiency, and common-sense skills. SEO/GEO ready.
97 lines (71 loc) • 4.84 kB
Markdown
name: summarize-meetings-into-decisions
description: "Extract decisions, rationale, owners, and unresolved questions from a meeting transcript."
category: common-sense
risk: safe
source: self
source_type: self
date_added: "2026-08-26"
tags: ["meeting-summaries", "decision-records", "executive-brief", "transcript-parsing", "productivity", "prompt-engineering"]
tools: ["claude", "cursor", "gemini", "codex", "chatgpt"]
# Summarize Meetings into Decisions (Decision Log Extraction) (AI Skill)
## Overview
When asked to summarize a 45-minute meeting transcript, standard AI outputs create a chronological play-by-play (*"First, Sarah presented the Q3 slide deck. Then Mark asked about pricing. Then Sarah replied that pricing was under review..."*).
This chronological narrative is nearly useless for executives and team members who weren't in the room. What matters are **the final decisions agreed upon, the rationale behind them, and who is accountable for execution**.
The **Decision Log Extraction Protocol** filters out conversational chatter and formats the meeting into an **Architecture / Executive Decision Record (ADR)**.
## Chronological Narrative vs. Decision Record
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Transcript Processing Models │
│ │
│ Chronological Narrative (Low Value): │
│ • 4 pages of "Bob said this, then Alice disagreed..." │
│ • High reading fatigue, impossible to find final agreements│
│ │
│ Decision Record (High Value): │
│ • [DECISION 1]: What was decided & why │
│ • [OPTIONS REJECTED]: What was eliminated & why │
│ • [ACTION ASSIGNMENTS]: [Owner] + [Task] + [Deadline] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Master Decision Record Prompt Templates
### Pattern 1: The Executive Decision Record (ADR)
Use for product, strategy, and leadership meetings:
```markdown
Analyze the attached meeting transcript: [ATTACH TRANSCRIPT / PASTE TEXT].
Do NOT write a chronological timeline of who spoke.
Extract a structured **Executive Decision Record**:
### 🎯 1. Key Decisions Made
For each decision, format as:
- **Decision**: [Clear 1-sentence statement of what was approved]
- **Rationale**: [Why this option won over alternatives]
- **Trade-off / Cost**: [What we are giving up or spending]
### 🚫 2. Options Explicitly Rejected
- [Option Name]: [Why the team decided NOT to proceed with this path]
### ⚡ 3. Accountable Action Items
| Task | Owner | Due Date | Definition of Done |
```
## Real-World Case Study
### Scenario: Product Team Pricing Sync
#### Chronological AI Output (Rambling)
> *"The meeting began at 2 PM. Dave suggested increasing enterprise pricing by 20%. Lisa expressed concern that existing customers might churn. Mark mentioned that our churn rate is currently 1.8%. After some back-and-forth discussion regarding grandfathering policies, the team decided to increase new customer pricing..."*
#### Decision Record Output (Instant Clarity)
### 🎯 1. Key Decisions Made
- **Decision**: Increase Enterprise Tier pricing by **20% (from $500/mo to $600/mo)** for all new signups starting September 1st.
- **Rationale**: Competitor benchmarks show we are 35% underpriced; low churn rate (1.8%) demonstrates strong price tolerance.
- **Grandfathering Policy**: All existing customers remain on legacy $500/mo pricing for 12 months.
### 🚫 2. Options Explicitly Rejected
- **Immediate Price Hike for Existing Customers**: Rejected due to risk of relationship damage with long-term champion accounts.
### ⚡ 3. Accountable Action Items
| Task | Owner | Due Date | Definition of Done |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Update Stripe Pricing Table** | Dave | Aug 25 | New $600/mo pricing tier live on staging. |
| **Draft Grandfathering FAQ Email** | Lisa | Aug 20 | Customer update email reviewed and approved. |
## Summary Best Practices
- **Ban "Who said what"**: Explicitly prompt *"Focus on team consensus and final decisions, not individual speech chronologies."*
- **Always record rejected options**: Capturing *why* an alternative was killed prevents the team from debating the exact same idea again 3 months later.