duhportinf

# DUH inference implementation overview This describes how the inference package takes as input both a set of bus definitions and a flat list of module ports, and uses these to infer the set of bus interfaces specified in the module. Given a single bus definition, the optimal mapping (or assignment) of a set of ports to this single bus definition can be found using linear programming (see [assignment problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_problem)). However, solving a single linear program is an expensive operation in itself. Naively enumerating all possible groupings of input ports, and solving as many linear programs as there are input bus definitions for every group within a grouping, is an infeasible approach to determining correct bus interfaces. This package uses a set of heuristics to greatly reduce the total number of linear programs that needs to be solved. A [prefix tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radix_tree) is first used to propose an intial set of port groups that takes into account the tendency of designers to encode hierarchy into names of ports. For all possible pairings of these initial port groups with the set of input bus definitions, a cheap cost function is computed to filter out the pairings unlikely to yield high quality mappings. The remaining much smaller set of pairings of port groups and input bus definitions are then scored by solving the corresponding linear programs. The resulting scores are used to determine port groups with their lowest cost bus definition and a short list of low cost alternative bus definitions. ## Components ### bus definition loader Bus specifications reside in `duh-bus` files and can describe either a master or slave definition or both. Loading of `duh-bus` files is described in the class definition `BusDef` in `busdef.py`. ### port prefix tree The process for building a prefix tree from a set of input port names is described in the class definition `BundleTree` in `_bundle.py`. The prefix tree is built as follows: 1) *Port name tokenization*: Each port name is first converted to a sequence of tokens, which induces a prefix subtree. 2) *Prefix tree construction*: These prefix subtrees are combined to yield a prefix tree over all input ports. 3) *Vector node tagging*: Prefix tree nodes that contain ports as children that form a vector are tagged and reformatted. 4) *Passthrough node removal*: Passthrough nodes (with only a single child) are flattened through to their parent node. ##### 1) Port name tokenization All port names are first tokenized into words as described in `words_from_name()` in `util.py`. The following transformations are applied in sequence to each name: * camelCase converted to snake\_case * all characters converted to lowercase * '\_' characters are inserted around groups of consecutive numbers * words are tokenized using the '\_' characters as delimiters. The following ports: ```python 'int_foo_1' 'int_foo_2' 'int_foo_3' 'int_bar_1' 'int_bar_sub_1' 'int_bar_diff_baz' 'int_test' ``` would generate the following set of tokens: ```python ['int', 'foo', '1'] ['int', 'foo', '2'] ['int', 'foo', '3'] ['int', 'bar', '1'] ['int', 'bar', 'sub', '1'] ['int', 'bar', 'diff', 'baz'] ['int', 'test'] ``` which would generate the following prefix subtrees: ``` int int int int int int int | | | | | | | foo foo foo bar bar bar test* | | | | | | 1* 2* 3* 1* sub diff | | 1* baz* ``` where `*` denotes nodes with corresponding ports attached. ##### 2) Prefix tree construction The above subtrees are combined to produce the following prefix tree: ``` int____________________ / \ \ foo____ bar______ test* / \ \ / \ \ 1* 2* 3* 1* sub diff | | 1* baz* ``` ##### 3) Vector node tagging Nodes corresponding to vectors of ports are tagged and reformatted. The ports `int_foo_1`, `int_foo_2`, and `int_foo_3` form a vector and the above prefix tree would be restructured: ``` int____________________ / \ \ foo(v) bar______ test* | / \ \ ['1', '2', '3']* 1* sub diff | | 1* baz* ``` ##### 4) Passthrough node removal Nodes that have only a single child are then flattened to remove unnecessary hierarchy. In the example, the node corresponding to "diff" in `int_bar_diff_baz` and the node corresponding to "sub" in `int_bar_sub_1` are both passthroughs. Flattening of a node means that its name is emended to include that of the child node, and the child node is skipped over: ``` int____________________ / \ \ foo(v) bar_______ test* | / \ \ ['1', '2', '3']* 1* sub_1* diff_baz* ``` ## Initial bus interface search Each non-leaf node in a port prefix tree induces a group of ports with names that share a common prefix. All of these nodes are first scored against the entire input set of bus definitions using a fast and cheap to compute cost function (fcost). The use of fcost as a first-pass filter of port prefix tree nodes is implemented in `main_portinf.py` in the function `_get_bus_pairings()`. #### The fcost approach The fcost function is implemented in `_optimize.py` in the function `_get_mapping_fcost_base()` and takes as input a single interface, which describes a set of input ports (each with a name, width, and direction), and a single bus interface, which describes a set of required and optional ports (each with a name, width, and direction). The output of fcost is a `MatchCost` object (also described in `_optimize.py`) that captures the sum total of {name, width, direction} mismatch penalties. The scalar value of these `MatchCost` objects, which is used in comparator operations, is a linear combination of these penalties that uses pre-specified weights. Fcost uses a greedy approach that assigns interface ports first to required and then to optional bus definition ports that match {width, direction} (without any regards to port or logical names). These first matches are considered perfect and incur zero `MatchCost`. The remaining interface ports are then assigned first to required and then to optional bus definitions ports that match {direction}, but mismatch {width}. Each such assignment incurs a single width `MatchCost` penalty. Each of the remaining unassigned interface ports and *required* bus definition ports incur a single width and direction `MatchCost` penalty. Lastly, a pseudoalignment name score between the set of interface port names and the set of bus definition logical names is computed as the Jaccard distance of all 2-character and 3-character tokens present within each set of names. A lower Jaccard distance implies a higher amount of shared tokens between the two name sets and that they are more compatible. This fcost function is cheap to compute as there is no need to optimize over all possible pairings of interface and bus definitions ports, and it can be computed with a couple of scans that are linear in the total number of interface ports. For each interface, bus definitions are sorted in increasing order of their global and local fcost scores (see below), and only the lowest scoring ones are considered for further mapping. #### Global versus local fcost scoring Occasionally designers of modules will take advantage of the fact that multiple bus interfaces do *not* collide in logical namespace and can be specified using the same prefix. Consider two separate interfaces that share the same prefix: ```python # APB-like interface 'int_PADDR', 'int_PSELx', 'int_PENABLE', 'int_PWRITE', 'int_PRDATA', 'int_PWDATA', 'int_PREADY', # AHB-like interface 'int_HADDR', 'int_HBURST', 'int_HSIZE', 'int_HTRANS', 'int_HWDATA', 'int_HWRITE', 'int_HRDATA', 'int_HREADYOUT', 'int_HRESP', 'int_HREADY', ``` Although this set of ports specifies two separate bus interfaces, the resulting prefix tree over the names will only ever yield them jointly within the same group. This joint group will have lower fcost scores against (incorrect) wider interfaces such as AXI and higher fcost scores against the correct narrower APB/AHB interfaces due to mismatches incurred by superfluous ports within the group. To allow potentially correct narrower interfaces to pass the fcost filter, a global and local fcost match score is computed for each interface and bus definition pair. A global fcost match assigns `MatchCost` penalties for all unmatched interface ports whereas a local fcost match does not. In a local fcost match, superfluous ports on the interface do not incur additional `MatchCost` penalties and the overall score is typically dominated by the pseudoalignment name score. In the above example, the APB and AHB bus definitions both have logical names closer in pseudoalignment distance to the interface ports than (incorrect) wider bus defintions, and will have decidedly lower local fcost scores. <a name="pruning-groups"></a> #### Pruning of suboptimal interface groups Each node within the prefix tree is assigned the lowest fcost score that was computed between the corresponding interface and all input bus definitions. Interface groups that do not achieve the lowest fcost for at least `min_num_leaves` (default=4) module ports are eliminated from further consideration. This pruning is described in `bundle.py` in the method `BundleTree.get_optimal_nids()`. This pruning process eliminates partial bus interface matches for prefix tree nodes that are descendents of a correct interface node. In these cases, a single fully specified bus interface is clearly preferred over multiple partial bus interfaces. ## Optimal bus interface scoring by solving linear programs The remaining much smaller set of port group interfaces and their corresponding candidate bus definitions are then fully (and optimally) mapped by solving a series of linear programs. Each optimal mapping has an associated `MatchCost`, which is the sum total each `MatchCost`s incurred by each {interface port, bus definition port} pair. This optimal bus interface scoring is implemented in `main_portinf.py` in the function `_get_initial_bus_matches()`. #### Specifying the assignment linear program The specification of the assignment linear program (and optimization procedure) is described in `_optimize.py` in the function `map_ports_to_bus()`. This function first computes `MatchCost`s for every pair of interface ports and bus definition ports to specify a total cost matrix. Pairs that mismatch in width or direction incur corresponding `MatchCost` penalties, and the `MatchCost` name penalty is computed as a pseudoalignment score between the interface and bus definition port names. Rows in the cost matrix correspond to interface ports and columns correspond to bus definition ports. An adjacency matrix (with 0,1 entries) specifies the mapping of interface ports to bus definition ports. An optimal mapping between interface and bus definition ports can be specified as a particular adjacency matrix that achieves the lowest sum total cost, subject to the constraint that each port is assigned only once. This desired optimal adjacency matrix can be completely described as a linear program. A further explanation of the problem statement can be found in a description of the [assignment problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_problem)). #### Optimization The specification of the linear program and invocation of an interior point solver are both done using [cvxopt](https://cvxopt.org/). The default python solver in cvxopt is quite slow, so the current implementation relies on invoking the external [glpk solver](https://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/) and this can be specified as an argument to cvxopt's `solve()` function. #### Tagging of sideband user ports For a given interface and bus definition and the corresponding optimal mapping, interface ports are then tagged as user "sideband" signals on the basis of port name and logical name compatibility. Each interface port name and bus definition logical name is first broken up into its 2-character and 3-character tokens. For each {interface port, bus definition port} assignment pair, the number of bus bus definition logical name tokens missing from the corresponding interface port name tokens is computed. If a particular interface port is missing *more than* the median number of tokens across all assignment pairs, then the interface port is tagged as a user sideband signal. As an example, consider the following mapping: ```python # <interface port> : <bus def port> { 'ahb_mst2_HADDR' : 'HADDR', 'ahb_mst2_HBURST' : 'HBURST', 'ahb_mst2_HSIZE' : 'HSIZE', 'ahb_mst2_HTRANS' : 'HTRANS', } ``` In this case, all the tokens in the bus definition logical names are present in the corresponding interface port names and no ports are tagged as user sideband signals. However, consider the following mapping: ```python # <interface port> : <bus def port> { 'pipe1_RATE' : 'RATE', 'pipe1_TXMARGIN' : 'TXMARGIN', 'pipe1_TXSWING' : 'TXSWING', 'pipe1_BLOCKALIGNCTRL' : 'BLKALNCTRL', 'pipe1_ERRFUNC' : 'RXSYNCHDR', } ``` In this case, the first three interface ports contain all the tokens from the corresponding bus definition logical names, so the median number of missing tokens is zero. The last two interface ports `'pipe1_BLOCKALIGNCTRL'` and `'pipe1_ERRFUNC'` are missing multiple tokens from the corresponding bus definition logical names and will both be tagged as user sideband signals. Tagging of user sideband signals is implemented in `_optimize.py` in the function `get_sideband_ports()`. #### Pruning of suboptimal interface groups Interface port groups are pruned from the output using the same procedure [previously described](#pruning-groups) under the first-pass fcost computation using optimal mapping `MatchCost`s.