UNPKG

create-aelf-dapp

Version:

Create aelf Dapp based on Next.js with one command

28 lines (18 loc) • 1.5 kB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
# Why use Tailwind CSS over Less/Sass or Pure CSS? ## 1. Efficiency: - Tailwind: Provides atomic class names for quick page building and avoids switching between HTML and CSS files. - Less/Sass: Requires custom styles, offers preprocessor features (variables, nesting), but slower iteration. - Pure CSS: Lacks advanced features, low development efficiency, manual style management. ## 2. File Size: - Tailwind: JIT mode generates only used classes, reducing file size significantly. - Less/Sass: Generated CSS size depends on custom styles, usually larger than Tailwind. - Pure CSS: Manual optimization needed, can easily become unmanageable. ## 3. Responsive Design: - Tailwind: Built-in responsive classes for easy adjustments across screen sizes. - Less/Sass: Custom media queries required, simplified by variables/mixins, but less convenient. - Pure CSS: Manual media queries, labor-intensive, error-prone. ## 4. Maintainability: - Tailwind: Unified design system via config files, consistent styles, reduces naming conflicts. - Less/Sass: Variables and mixins improve maintainability, but requires consistent naming conventions. Nesting can increase complexity. - Pure CSS: Global scope leads to naming conflicts and style overrides, lacks variables/mixins, prone to code repetition. By comparing these aspects, Tailwind CSS shows significant advantages in terms of efficiency, file size, responsive design, and maintainability, making it a powerful tool for modern web development.