UNPKG

claude-flow-novice

Version:

Claude Flow Novice - Advanced orchestration platform for multi-agent AI workflows with CFN Loop architecture Includes Local RuVector Accelerator and all CFN skills for complete functionality.

147 lines (115 loc) 4.49 kB
# Minimal Fix: Inject Test Diagnostics into Iteration Context ## Problem Test failure diagnostics are **captured** by `gate-check.sh` but **not consumed** by next iteration agents. ## Solution **Piggyback on existing `build_agent_context()` function** - add 15 lines of code. ## The Change **File:** `.claude/skills/cfn-loop-orchestration/orchestrate.sh` **Function:** `build_agent_context()` (line 375-454) **Location:** After line 433 (where iteration is added) ### Current Code (lines 433-437) ```bash context="$context | Iteration: $iteration" if [[ -n "$feedback" ]]; then context="$context | Feedback: $feedback" fi ``` ### Enhanced Code (add after line 433) ```bash context="$context | Iteration: $iteration" # Inject test failure diagnostics from previous iteration if [ "$iteration" -gt 1 ]; then local iteration_context_file="/tmp/cfn-iteration-context-${task_id}.json" if [ -f "$iteration_context_file" ]; then # Extract failed test summary local failed_summary=$(jq -r ' if .failed_tests and (.failed_tests | length > 0) then "Previous Test Results (Iteration " + (.iteration // "N/A" | tostring) + "): " + "Pass Rate: " + (.pass_rate * 100 | tostring) + "% | " + "Failed Tests: " + ([.failed_tests[] | .failed_test_names[]? // empty] | join(", ")) else empty end ' "$iteration_context_file" 2>/dev/null) if [ -n "$failed_summary" ]; then context="$context | $failed_summary" fi fi fi if [[ -n "$feedback" ]]; then context="$context | Feedback: $feedback" fi ``` ## What This Does **Before (Iteration 2 context):** ``` Task: Implement JWT auth | Deliverables: auth.ts, auth.test.ts | Iteration: 2 | Feedback: <empty> ``` **After (Iteration 2 context):** ``` Task: Implement JWT auth | Deliverables: auth.ts, auth.test.ts | Iteration: 2 | Previous Test Results (Iteration 1): Pass Rate: 80% | Failed Tests: JWT authentication › should reject expired tokens, JWT authentication › should refresh tokens correctly | Feedback: <empty> ``` ## Implementation Effort **Complexity:** Trivial **Lines of code:** ~15 **Files changed:** 1 (`orchestrate.sh`) **Testing required:** Run one CFN Loop task with intentional test failures **Risk:** Very low (only adds context, doesn't change logic) ## Expected Impact **Current system:** - Iteration 1: 80% pass → ITERATE (no context passed) - Iteration 2: Agent guesses fixes → 90% pass → ITERATE - Iteration 3: Agent guesses again → 100% pass → PROCEED - **Total: 3 iterations** **With this fix:** - Iteration 1: 80% pass → ITERATE (diagnostics captured) - Iteration 2: Agent sees exact failures → targets fixes → 100% pass → PROCEED - **Total: 2 iterations (33% reduction)** Based on TDD guide stats: **Expected 44% iteration reduction** (3.2 avg → 1.8 avg) ## Why This Beats Full Conversation Coordinator **Full Conversation Coordinator:** - Multi-turn conversation history - Redis-backed persistence - Pruning strategies - Conversation memory management - **Effort:** 3 weeks - **Complexity:** High **This Minimal Fix:** - Uses existing `generate_iteration_context()` output - Piggybacks on existing `build_agent_context()` flow - Reads file that's already being created - **Effort:** 1 hour - **Complexity:** Trivial ## Trade-offs **What you GET:** ✅ Test diagnostics in next iteration ✅ 44% iteration reduction (from TDD guide) ✅ Zero architectural changes ✅ Works with current CLI/Task mode **What you DON'T get:** ❌ Multi-turn conversation beyond test results ❌ Manual refinement across iterations ❌ Conversation pruning strategies ❌ Long-term conversation memory ## Recommendation **Start with this minimal fix:** 1. Implement 15-line enhancement to `build_agent_context()` 2. Run 5-10 CFN Loop tasks to measure iteration reduction 3. **IF** you need more sophisticated conversation management → build full coordinator 4. **IF** this solves 80% of the problem → stop here **Why:** 80/20 rule - get 80% of the benefit with 5% of the effort. ## Next Step Want me to: 1. **Implement this minimal fix** (make the code change)? 2. **Write a test case** to validate it works? 3. **Skip it** and focus on other priorities?