UNPKG

bluesharp-pitch-detection

Version:

High-accuracy pitch detection algorithms for musical applications

84 lines (82 loc) 2.38 kB
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> <title>Algorithm Comparison - Bluesharp Pitch Detection</title> <style> body { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; color: #333; max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 20px; } h1 { color: #2c3e50; border-bottom: 2px solid #3498db; padding-bottom: 10px; } .back-link { display: inline-block; margin-bottom: 20px; color: #3498db; text-decoration: none; } .back-link:hover { text-decoration: underline; } #results { background-color: #f9f9f9; border-radius: 8px; padding: 20px; margin: 20px 0; box-shadow: 0 2px 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); min-height: 200px; max-height: 600px; overflow-y: auto; font-family: monospace; white-space: pre-wrap; } button { background-color: #3498db; color: white; padding: 10px 20px; border: none; border-radius: 4px; font-size: 16px; cursor: pointer; margin-right: 10px; } button:hover { background-color: #2980b9; } .description { margin-bottom: 20px; } </style> </head> <body> <h1>Algorithm Comparison Example</h1> <a href="index.html" class="back-link">← Back to Examples</a> <div class="description"> <p> This example compares different pitch detection algorithms (YIN, MPM, FFT, and Hybrid) on various test signals to demonstrate their strengths and weaknesses. </p> <p> The comparison includes: </p> <ul> <li>Pure sine wave (440 Hz - A4)</li> <li>Complex tone with harmonics (261.63 Hz - C4)</li> <li>Noisy signal (329.63 Hz - E4 with noise)</li> </ul> </div> <script type="module"> // Import the example script import './algorithm-comparison.js'; </script> </body> </html>