UNPKG

bc-code-intelligence-mcp

Version:

BC Code Intelligence MCP Server - Complete Specialist Bundle with AI-driven expert consultation, seamless handoffs, and context-preserving workflows

102 lines (66 loc) 5.07 kB
--- title: "TestField Best Practices and Patterns" domain: "sam-coder" difficulty: "intermediate" bc_versions: "14+" tags: ["best-practices", "validation", "code-quality", "maintainability"] prerequisites: ["testfield-basic-syntax", "testfield-error-handling"] samples: "samples/testfield-patterns.md" --- # TestField Best Practices and Patterns ## Overview Effective TestField usage follows established patterns that ensure data integrity while maintaining code readability and performance. These practices have evolved from real-world BC development experience. **Core Philosophy**: Use TestField for essential validations that prevent data corruption, complement with custom validation for business rule enforcement. ## Fundamental Best Practices ### Validation Placement Strategy Place TestField calls at the beginning of procedures to fail fast and provide immediate feedback. Early validation prevents complex processing with invalid data and provides clear error context. ### Logical Validation Grouping Group related TestField calls to create clear validation blocks that represent business concepts. Organize validations by functional area (shipping, billing, customer data) for better code readability and maintenance. ### Context-Appropriate Validation Match validation intensity to business context - more thorough validation for critical operations, lighter validation for routine operations. ## Design Patterns ### Mandatory Field Pattern Establish core validation procedures that verify essential fields for business entities. Focus on fields required for basic entity operation and integrity across all business scenarios. ### Status-Driven Validation Pattern Apply different validation rules based on record workflow status. Each status level has specific field requirements that must be validated before status transitions or processing. ### Conditional Validation Pattern Implement business rule-driven validation where field requirements depend on other field values or business context. Ensures data consistency while avoiding over-validation. ## Advanced Patterns ### Validation Factory Pattern Create generic validation procedures that route different record types to appropriate validation logic. Enables consistent validation interface across multiple entity types. ### Progressive Validation Pattern Implement validation intensity levels based on business context. Basic operations require minimal validation while complex operations require comprehensive field validation. ### Validation Chain Pattern Structure validation as sequential steps where each step must pass before proceeding. Provides clear validation progression and enables early exit when validation fails. ## Integration Patterns ### Event-Driven Validation Integrate TestField validation into table event subscribers for automatic validation during record operations. Ensures consistent validation across all insertion and modification paths. ### API Validation Integration Adapt TestField validation for API scenarios using TryFunction patterns. Capture validation errors and convert them to structured API response messages rather than allowing system errors to propagate. ## Code Quality Practices ### Readable Validation Blocks Organize TestField calls with clear comments indicating validation purpose. Group related fields together and document business rationale for field requirements to improve code maintainability. ### Validation Documentation Document validation rules and business reasons for TestField usage, especially for complex business scenarios. ### Maintainable Validation Logic Structure validation procedures to be easily testable and maintainable as business rules evolve. ## Common Anti-Patterns ### Over-Validation Avoid excessive TestField calls that create poor user experience without meaningful business value. ### Mixed Concerns Don't mix TestField validation with complex business logic in the same procedure. ### Performance-Blind Validation Avoid TestField in tight loops without considering cumulative performance impact. ### Context-Blind Validation Don't apply same validation rules across all scenarios without considering business context. ## Testing Strategies ### Validation Testing Create test procedures that validate both successful and failing TestField scenarios. Test mandatory field validation by attempting validation with empty records and verifying error conditions trigger correctly. For complete testing examples, see companion sample file with working AL test procedures. ### Edge Case Testing Test validation behavior with edge cases like empty strings, special characters, and boundary values. ## Evolution and Maintenance ### Validation Rule Changes Plan for validation rule changes by structuring validation logic in dedicated procedures that can be easily modified. ### Backward Compatibility When changing validation rules, consider impact on existing data and provide migration paths.