UNPKG

archunit

Version:

ArchUnit TypeScript is an architecture testing library, to specify and assert architecture rules in your TypeScript app

1,469 lines (1,080 loc) 51.7 kB
# ArchUnitTS - Architecture Testing <div align="center" name="top"> <img align="center" src="assets/logo-rounded.png" width="150" height="150" alt="ArchUnitTS Logo"> <!-- spacer --> <p></p> [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT) [![Build & tests](https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/status/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS/integrate.yaml?branch=main&label=build%20%26%20tests)](https://github.com/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS/actions/workflows/integrate.yaml) [![GitHub stars](https://img.shields.io/github/stars/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS.svg)](https://github.com/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS)<br> [![npm downloads](https://img.shields.io/npm/dm/archunit.svg?color=007ec6)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/archunit) [![npm total downloads](https://img.shields.io/npm/dt/archunit.svg?label=total%20downloads&color=007ec6)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/archunit) <!-- [![npm version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/archunit.svg)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/archunit) --> </div> Enforce architecture rules in TypeScript and JavaScript projects. Check for dependency directions, detect circular dependencies, enforce coding standards and much more. Integrates with every testing framework. Very simple setup and pipeline integration. The #1 architecture testing library for TypeScript, measured by GitHub stars. _Inspired by the amazing ArchUnit library but we are not affiliated with ArchUnit._ [Setup](#-setup) • [Demo](#-demo) • [Use Cases](#-use-cases) • [Features](#-features) • [Why ArchUnitTS?](#-library-comparison) • [Sponsor](https://github.com/sponsors/LukasNiessen) • [Contributing](CONTRIBUTING.md) • [Documentation](https://lukasniessen.github.io/ArchUnitTS/) ## ⚡ 5 min Quickstart ### Installation ```bash npm install archunit --save-dev ``` ### Add tests Simply add tests to your existing test suites. The following is an example using Jest. First we ensure that we have no circular dependencies. ```typescript import { projectFiles, metrics } from 'archunit'; it('should not have circular dependencies', async () => { const rule = projectFiles().inFolder('src/**').should().haveNoCycles(); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` Next we ensure that our layered architecture is respected. ```typescript it('presentation layer should not depend on database layer', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('src/presentation/**') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('src/database/**'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('business layer should not depend on database layer', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('src/business/**') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('src/database/**'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); // More layers ... ``` Lastly we ensure that some code metric rules are met. ```typescript it('should not contain too large files', async () => { const rule = metrics().count().linesOfCode().shouldBeBelow(1000); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should only have classes with high cohesion', async () => { // LCOM metric (lack of cohesion of methods), low = high cohesion const rule = metrics().lcom().lcom96b().shouldBeBelow(0.3); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### CI Integration These tests will run automatically in your testing setup, for example in your CI pipeline, so that's basically it. This setup ensures that the architectural rules you have defined are always adhered to! 🌻🐣 Additionally, you can generate reports and save them as artifacts. Here's a simple example using GitLab CI. _Note that reports are in beta._ ```typescript it('should generate HTML reports', async () => { const countMetrics = metrics().count(); const lcomMetrics = metrics().lcom(); // Saves HTML report files to /reports await countMetrics.exportAsHTML(); await lcomMetrics.exportAsHTML(); // So we get no warning about an empty test expect(0).toBe(0); }); ``` You can also export dependency graph reports as CI artifacts: ```typescript it('should generate dependency graph reports', async () => { await projectGraph() .collapseToFolderDepth(2) .exportAsHTML('reports/dependency-graph.html'); await projectGraph().exportAsMermaid('reports/dependency-graph.mmd'); expect(0).toBe(0); }); ``` In your `gitlab-ci.yml`: ```yml test: script: - npm test artifacts: when: always paths: - reports ``` ## 🚐 Setup Installation: ```bash npm install archunit --save-dev ``` If you're using Jest, that's it already. For Vitest, Jasmine or any other framework, please read below. We have added special syntax for Jest, Vitest and Jasmine: `toPassAsync()`. We strongly recommend using it. Many benefits come with it, for example beautiful error messages in case of a failing tests. ### Jest Works out of the box. ### Vitest Works out of the box too, **but** you must have configured Vitest with `globals: true` in your `vitest.config.ts`. This means you need a `vitest.config.ts` file at project root with content that may look like this: ```ts import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config'; export default defineConfig({ test: { globals: true, // This line matters !! ... }, }); ``` ### Jasmine Jasmine unfortunately has some constraints and requires minimal setup. However, you will need just one line of code: ```typescript beforeEach(() => { jasmine.addAsyncMatchers(jasmineMatcher); }); ``` Include this in your test files. And, since this is an asynchronous matcher, you must use `expectAsync` with Jasmine, not `expect`. Example: ```typescript describe('architecture', () => { beforeEach(() => { jasmine.addAsyncMatchers(jasmineMatcher); }); it('business logic should not depend on the ui', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('business') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('ui'); await expectAsync(rule).toPassAsync(); // expectAsync, not expect !! }); ``` ### Other Framework If you're not using Jest, Vitest or Jasmine, we do not have special syntax support but you can of course still use ArchUnitTS. Please read [here](#check). ## 🎬 Demo https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/426f7b47-5157-4e92-98a3-f5ab4f7a388a ## 🐹 Use Cases Many common uses cases are covered in our examples folder. Note that they are not fully working repositories but code snippets. Here is an overview. **Layered Architecture:** - [Fastify BackEnd using a UML Diagram](examples/layered-architecture/fastify-uml/README.md) **Micro Frontends:** - [React Micro Frontends using Nx](examples/micro-frontends/react/README.md) **Clean Architecture:** - [Clean Architecture implementation using NestJS](examples/clean-architecture/nestjs/README.md) **Hexagonal Architecture:** - [Hexagonal Architecture using Express](examples/hexagonal-architecture/express/README.md) - Ports and Adapters pattern implementation with Express.js **Angular Example:** - [A typical Angular FrontEnd](examples/angular-example/README.md) ## 🐲 Example Repositories Here are a few repositories with fully functioning examples that use ArchUnitTS to ensure architectural rules: - **[Vitest Example](https://github.com/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS-Vitest-Example)**: Complete Vitest setup with architecture tests - **[Jest Example](https://github.com/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS-Jest-Example)**: Full Jest integration examples - **[Jasmine Example](https://github.com/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS-Jasmine-Example)**: Jasmine testing framework integration ## 🐣 Features This is an overview of what you can do with ArchUnitTS. ### Circular Dependencies ```typescript it('services should be free of cycles', async () => { const rule = projectFiles().inFolder('src/services/**').should().haveNoCycles(); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Layer Dependencies ```typescript it('should respect clean architecture layers', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('src/presentation/**') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('src/database/**'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('business layer should not depend on presentation', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('src/business/**') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('src/presentation/**'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Naming Conventions ```typescript it('should follow naming patterns', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('src/services/**') .should() .haveName('*-service.ts'); // my-service.ts for example await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('components should be PascalCase', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('src/components/**') .should() .haveName(/^[A-Z][a-zA-Z]*Commponent\.ts$/); // MyComponent.ts for example await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Code Metrics ```typescript it('should not contain too large files', async () => { const rule = metrics().count().linesOfCode().shouldBeBelow(1000); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should have high class cohesion', async () => { const rule = metrics().lcom().lcom96b().shouldBeBelow(0.3); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should count methods per class', async () => { const rule = metrics().count().methodCount().shouldBeBelow(20); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should limit statements per file', async () => { const rule = metrics().count().statements().shouldBeBelowOrEqual(100); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should have 3 fields per Data class', async () => { const rule = metrics() .forClassesMatching(/.*Data.*/) .count() .fieldCount() .shouldBe(3); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Distance Metrics ```typescript it('should maintain proper coupling', async () => { const rule = metrics().distance().couplingFactor().shouldBeBelow(0.5); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should stay close to main sequence', async () => { const rule = metrics().distance().distanceFromMainSequence().shouldBeBelow(0.3); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Custom Rules You can define your own custom rules. ```typescript const ruleDesc = 'TypeScript files should export functionality'; const myCustomRule = (file: FileInfo) => { // TypeScript files should contain export statements return file.content.includes('export'); }; const violations = await projectFiles() .withName('*.ts') // all ts files .should() .adhereTo(myCustomRule, ruleDesc) .check(); expect(violations).toStrictEqual([]); ``` ### Custom Metrics You can define your own metrics as well. ```typescript it('should have a nice method field ratio', async () => { const rule = metrics() .customMetric( 'methodFieldRatio', 'Ratio of methods to fields', (classInfo) => classInfo.methods.length / Math.max(classInfo.fields.length, 1) ) .shouldBeBelowOrEqual(10); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Architecture Slices ```typescript it('should adhere to UML diagram', async () => { const diagram = ` @startuml component [controllers] component [services] [controllers] --> [services] @enduml`; const rule = projectSlices().definedBy('src/(**)/').should().adhereToDiagram(diagram); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should not contain forbidden dependencies', async () => { const rule = projectSlices() .definedBy('src/(**)/') .shouldNot() .containDependency('services', 'controllers'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Dependency Graph Reports Generate dependency graph reports in multiple formats and narrow them to the part of the codebase you want to inspect. ```typescript import { projectGraph } from 'archunit'; it('should export dependency graph reports', async () => { const graph = projectGraph().titled('Application Architecture'); await graph.collapseToFolderDepth(2).exportAsMermaid('reports/dependencies.mmd'); await graph.focusOn('src/**', 1).exportAsHTML('reports/source-dependencies.html'); expect(0).toBe(0); }); ``` Supported formats: - DOT (`exportAsDOT`, `toDOT`) - Mermaid (`exportAsMermaid`, `toMermaid`) - D2 (`exportAsD2`, `toD2`) - CSV (`exportAsCSV`, `toCSV`) - JSON (`exportAsJSON`, `toJSON`) - HTML (`exportAsHTML`, `toHTML`) Graph exploration options: - `focusOn(pattern, depth)` keeps matching files and their neighbors. - `reachableFrom(pattern)` keeps matching files and their transitive dependencies. - `dependentsOf(pattern)` keeps files that transitively depend on the matching files. - `collapseToFolderDepth(depth)` aggregates files to folder-level graph nodes. - `collapseByPattern(pattern, replacement)` maps files to custom graph nodes. - `includeExternalDependencies()` includes external edges when graph extraction provides them. ### Reports Generate beautiful HTML reports for your metrics. The default output path is `/reports`. _Note that this features is in beta._ ```typescript // Export count metrics report await metrics().count().exportAsHTML('reports/count-metrics.html', { title: 'Count Metrics Dashboard', includeTimestamp: true, }); // Export LCOM cohesion metrics report await metrics().lcom().exportAsHTML('reports/lcom-metrics.html', { title: 'Code Cohesion Analysis', includeTimestamp: false, }); // Export distance metrics report await metrics().distance().exportAsHTML('reports/distance-metrics.html'); ``` ```typescript // Export comprehensive report with all metrics import { MetricsExporter } from 'archunitts'; await MetricsExporter.exportComprehensiveAsHTML(undefined, { outputPath: 'reports/comprehensive-metrics.html', title: 'Complete Architecture Metrics Dashboard', customCss: '.metric-card { border-radius: 8px; }', }); ``` The export functionality can be customized, for example by specifying an output path and custom CSS. Thanks to this, it's also very easy to include generated reports into your deploy process of, let's say, your GitHub page or GitLab page. ## 🔎 Pattern Matching System We offer three targeting options for pattern matching across all modules: - **`withName(pattern)`** - Pattern is checked against the filename (eg. `Service.ts` from `src/services/Service.ts`) - **`inPath(pattern)`** - Pattern is checked against against the full relative path (eg. `src/services/Service.ts`) - **`inFolder(pattern)`** - Pattern is checked against the path without filename (eg. `src/services` from `src/services/Service.ts`) For the metrics module there is an additional one: - **`forClassesMatching(pattern)`** - Pattern is checked against class names. The filepath or filename does not matter here ### Pattern Types We support string patterns and regular expressions. String patterns support glob, see below. ```typescript // String patterns with glob support (case sensitive) .withName('*.service.ts') // All files ending with .service.ts .inFolder('**/services') // All files in any services folder .inPath('src/api/**/*.ts') // All TypeScript files under src/api // Regular expressions (case sensitive - use when you need exact case matching) .withName(/^.*Service\.ts$/) // Same as *.service.ts but case-sensitive .inFolder(/services$/) // Folders ending with 'services' (case-sensitive) // For metrics module: Class name matching with regex .forClassesMatching(/.*Service$/) // Classes ending with 'Service' .forClassesMatching(/^User.*/) // Classes starting with 'User' ``` ### Excluding Matches All pattern methods accept an optional second argument with `except`. This is useful when a folder is generally forbidden, but a small public surface is allowed. ```typescript it('should consume orders only through its public API', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inPath('src/app/**/*.ts', { except: { inPath: 'src/app/orders/**' }, }) .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('src/app/orders/**', { except: ['index.ts', 'public-api.ts'], }); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` You can also make exclusions explicit by target: ```typescript projectFiles() .inPath('src/app/**/*.ts', { except: { inPath: 'src/app/generated/**', inFolder: 'src/app/testing/**', withName: '*.spec.ts', }, }) .should() .beInPath('src/app/**'); metrics() .forClassesMatching('*Service', { except: { forClassesMatching: '*Legacy*' }, }) .lcom() .lcom96b() .shouldBeBelow(0.8); ``` ### Case Sensitivity - **Strings/glob patterns**: Case **sensitive** by default - **Regular expressions**: Case **sensitive** by default If you need case-insensitive matching, use regular expressions with the `i` flag: ```typescript // Case sensitive regex (default) .withName(/^.*service\.ts$/) // Matches service.ts ``` ```typescript // Case insensitive regex .withName(/^.*service\.ts$/i) // Matches Service.ts, service.ts, SERVICE.ts ``` ### Glob Patterns Guide Glob patterns provide powerful wildcard matching for paths and filenames: #### Basic Wildcards - `*` - Matches any characters within a single path segment (except `/`) - `**` - Matches any characters across multiple path segments - `?` - Matches exactly one character - `[abc]` - Matches any character in the bracket set - `[a-z]` - Matches any character in the range #### Common Glob Examples ```typescript // Filename patterns .withName('*.ts') // All TypeScript files .withName('*.{js,ts}') // All JavaScript or TypeScript files .withName('*Service.ts') // Files ending with 'Service.ts' .withName('User*.ts') // Files starting with 'User' .withName('?est.ts') // test.ts, nest.ts, etc // Folder patterns .inFolder('**/services') // Any 'services' folder at any depth .inFolder('src/services') // Exact 'src/services' folder .inFolder('**/test/**') // Any folder containing 'test' in path .inFolder('src/*') // Direct subfolders of 'src' // Path patterns .inPath('src/**/*.service.ts') // Service files anywhere under src .inPath('**/test/**/*.spec.ts') // Test files in any test folder .inPath('src/domain/*/*.ts') // TypeScript files one level under domain ``` ### Recommendation We generally recommend to use string with glob support unless you need to deal with very special cases. Writing regular expressions yourself is not necessary for most cases and comes with extra complexity. For example, let's say you want to enforce some rule upon files inside `src/components`. If you use a RegExp you might first try this: ```typescript .inFolder(/.*\/components\/.*/) ``` But this will not work reliably. It will not match `src/components/my-component.ts`. That's because ArchUnitTS will compare the _'folder path'_ here, that is the path without the filename, so in this case: `src/components`. The RegExp does not match this because it does not have an ending `/`. So the RegExp should be something like `.*\/components(\/.*)?`. Much simpler would be `'**/components/**`. That being said, of course there are cases where glob syntax is just not strong enough and you will have to go with a RegExp. ### Check Methods: .check() vs toPassAsync() ArchUnitTS provides two main methods for executing architecture rules. #### `toPassAsync()` This is special syntax we have added for Jest, Vitest and Jasmine. If you're using one of these testing frameworks, you should always use `toPassAsync()`. Many benefits come with it, for example beautiful error messages in case of a failing tests. **Important:** If you're using Vitest or Jasmine, please read below! ```typescript // Jest/Vitest await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); // With configuration options await expect(rule).toPassAsync(options); ``` Here `options` can be used for enabling logging, disable caching, or to not fail on empty tests. ```javascript { logging: { enabled: true, // show logs level: 'debug', // show lots of logs logFile: true // write logs to file inside ./logs folder. You can specify a custom path too. }, // if your rule 'passes' because it 'passed' zero files, the test normally fails. You can turn this off by setting this true allowEmptyTests: true, clearCache: true // reading nodes, imports etc is normally cached, } ``` **Vitest Hint:** If you're using Vitest, you must have configured Vitest with `globals: true` in your `vitest.config.ts`. This means you need a `vitest.config.ts` file at project root with content that may look like this: ```ts import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config'; export default defineConfig({ test: { globals: true, // This line matters !! environment: 'node', coverage: { provider: 'v8', reporter: ['text', 'json', 'html'], }, include: ['**/*.{test,spec}.?(c|m)[jt]s?(x)'], }, }); ``` **Jasmine Hint:** If you're using Jasmine, unfortunately the full automatic set up is not possible due to Jasmine constraints. You will need just one line of code though: ```typescript beforeEach(() => { jasmine.addAsyncMatchers(jasmineMatcher); }); ``` Include this in your test files. And, since this is an asynchronous matcher, you must use `expectAsync` with Jasmine. ```typescript describe('architecture', () => { beforeEach(() => { jasmine.addAsyncMatchers(jasmineMatcher); }); it('business logic should not depend on the ui', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('business') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('ui'); await expectAsync(rule).toPassAsync(); // expectAsync, not expect !! }); ``` #### `check()` For all other testing frameworks we don't have special syntax support but you can still easily use ArchUnitTS as follows: ```typescript // Mocha example const violations = await rule.check(); expect(violations).to.have.length(0); ``` The `check()` method works universally. It returns a violations array and is designed for testing frameworks without custom matcher support (Mocha, Node.js assert, etc.). You can assert the violations arrays length for example. ```typescript // With configuration options, the same ones as mentioned above const violations = await rule.check(options); ... ``` #### Configuration Options Both methods accept the same configuration options: ```typescript interface CheckOptions { // default undefined, which is treated as no logging logging?: { enabled: boolean; level: 'debug' | 'info' | 'warn' | 'error'; }; allowEmptyTests?: boolean; // Default: false clearCache?: boolean; // Default: false } ``` #### When to Use Which Method - **Use `toPassAsync()`** with Jest, Vitest, or Jasmine for better integration and error reporting - **Use `check()`** with Mocha, Node.js assert, or any other testing framework - **Use `check()`** when you need to inspect violations programmatically before deciding how to handle them ### Basic Pattern Matching Examples ```typescript import { projectFiles, metrics } from 'archunit'; // Files module - Test architectural rules projectFiles().withName('*.service.ts').should().beInFolder('**/services/**'); // Metrics module - Test only service classes metrics().withName('*.service.ts').lcom().lcom96b().shouldBeBelow(0.7); // Files module - Test classes in specific folders projectFiles() .inFolder('**/controllers/**') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('**/database/**'); // Metrics module - Test classes in specific folders metrics().inFolder('**/controllers/**').count().methodCount().shouldBeBelow(20); // Files module - Test classes matching full path patterns projectFiles().inPath('src/domain/**/*.ts').should().haveNoCycles(); // Metrics module - Test classes matching full path patterns metrics().inPath('src/domain/**/*.ts').lcom().lcom96a().shouldBeBelow(0.8); ``` ### Advanced Pattern Matching You can combine multiple pattern matching methods for precise targeting across all modules: ```typescript // Files module - Combine folder and filename patterns projectFiles() .inFolder('**/services/**') .withName('*.service.ts') .should() .haveNoCycles(); // Metrics module - Combine folder and filename patterns metrics().inFolder('**/services/**').withName('*.service.ts').lcom().lcom96b(); // Files module - Mix pattern matching with dependency rules projectFiles().inPath('src/api/**').shouldNot().dependOnFiles().inPath('src/database/**'); // Metrics module - Mix pattern matching with class name matching metrics() .inPath('src/api/**') .forClassesMatching(/.*Controller/) .count() .methodCount() .shouldBeBelow(15); ``` ### Naming Convention Examples Pattern matching is particularly useful for enforcing naming conventions: ```typescript // Match camelCase test files projectFiles() .withName(/^[a-z][a-zA-Z]*\.spec\.ts$/) .should() .beInFolder('**/test/**') .check(); // Match interface files (starting with I) projectFiles() .withName(/^I[A-Z][a-zA-Z]*\.ts$/) .should() .beInFolder('**/interfaces/**') .check(); // Match constant files (all uppercase) projectFiles() .withName(/^[A-Z_]+\.ts$/) .should() .beInFolder('**/constants/**') .check(); // Metrics for PascalCase controllers metrics() .withName(/^[A-Z][a-zA-Z]*Controller\.ts$/) .lcom() .lcom96b() .shouldBeBelow(0.5) .check(); ``` ### Complex Pattern Matching Scenarios Here are more advanced use cases combining different pattern types: ```typescript // Ensure all TypeScript files in feature folders follow naming conventions projectFiles() .inPath('src/features/**/*.ts') .withName(/^[A-Z][a-zA-Z]*\.(service|controller|model)\.ts$/) .should() .haveNoCycles(); // Test that utility files have low complexity metrics() .inFolder('**/utils/**') .withName('*.util.ts') .complexity() .cyclomaticComplexity() .shouldBeBelow(5); // Ensure test files don't depend on implementation details projectFiles() .withName('*.spec.ts') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inPath('src/**/internal/**'); // Check cohesion of domain entities metrics() .inPath('src/domain/entities/**/*.ts') .withName(/^[A-Z][a-zA-Z]*Entity\.ts$/) .lcom() .lcom96a() .shouldBeBelow(0.6); ``` ### Supported Metrics Types #### LCOM (Lack of Cohesion of Methods) The LCOM metrics measure how well the methods and fields of a class are connected, indicating the cohesion level of the class. Lower values indicate better cohesion. ```typescript // LCOM96a (Handerson et al.) metrics().lcom().lcom96a().shouldBeBelow(0.8); // LCOM96b (Handerson et al.) metrics().lcom().lcom96b().shouldBeBelow(0.7); ``` The LCOM96b metric is calculated as: ``` LCOM96b = (m - sum(μ(A))/m)/(1-1/m) ``` Where: - `m` is the number of methods in the class - `μ(A)` is the number of methods that access an attribute (field) A The result is a value between 0 and 1: - 0: perfect cohesion (all methods access all attributes) - 1: complete lack of cohesion (each method accesses its own attribute) #### Count Metrics Measure various counts within classes: ```typescript // Method count metrics().count().methodCount().shouldBeBelow(20); // Field count metrics().count().fieldCount().shouldBeBelow(15).; // Lines of code metrics().count().linesOfCode().shouldBeBelow(200); ``` #### Distance Metrics Measure architectural distance metrics: ```typescript // Abstractness metrics().distance().abstractness().shouldBeAbove(0.3); // Instability metrics().distance().instability().shouldBeBelow(0.8); // Distance from main sequence metrics().distance().distanceFromMainSequence().shouldBeBelow(0.5); ``` #### Custom Metrics Define your own metrics with custom calculation logic: ```typescript metrics() .customMetric( 'complexityRatio', 'Ratio of methods to fields', (classInfo) => classInfo.methods.length / Math.max(classInfo.fields.length, 1) ) .shouldBeBelow(3.0); ``` ## Slices API The above info regarding filtering (`inFolder()` etc) does not apply to the slices API but only to the files and metrics APIs. the slices API has different a way of doing filtering. See more in the examples or below. ## 🔧 Nx Monorepo Support ArchUnitTS provides support for Nx monorepos by reading the Nx project graph and making it accessible through the slices API. This allows you to validate architecture rules based on your actual Nx project structure and dependencies. ### Nx Project Slices The `nxProjectSlices()` function reads your Nx workspace configuration and creates slices based on your Nx projects: ```typescript import { nxProjectSlices } from 'archunit'; import * as path from 'path'; it('should adhere to Nx project architecture', async () => { const rule = nxProjectSlices().should().haveNoCycles(); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Nx Project Boundaries Enforce boundaries between Nx applications and libraries using the project graph: ```typescript it('should respect Nx project boundaries', async () => { // Apps should not depend on other apps const rule = nxProjectSlices() .matching('apps/admin') .shouldNot() .dependOnSlices() .matching('apps/client'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should enforce library type boundaries', async () => { // Feature libs should not depend on other feature libs const rule = nxProjectSlices() .matching('feature-*') .shouldNot() .dependOnSlices() .matching('feature-*'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### UML Diagram Validation with Nx Validate your Nx architecture against PlantUML diagrams: ```typescript it('should adhere to Nx architecture diagram', async () => { const diagramLocation = path.resolve('docs', 'components.puml'); const rule = nxProjectSlices() .ignoringExternalDependencies() .should() .adhereToDiagramInFile(diagramLocation); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should follow inline diagram', async () => { const diagram = ` @startuml component [shared-ui] as UI component [feature-auth] as Auth component [feature-dashboard] as Dashboard component [shared-data-access] as Data Auth --> UI Dashboard --> UI Auth --> Data Dashboard --> Data @enduml`; const rule = nxProjectSlices().should().adhereToDiagram(diagram); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Nx Project Type Validation Enforce Nx project categorization and naming conventions: ```typescript it('should follow Nx project naming patterns', async () => { // Feature projects should follow naming convention const rule = nxProjectSlices() .matching(/^feature-/) .should() .containSlices() .matching(/^feature-[a-z-]+$/); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); it('should enforce shared library dependencies', async () => { // Shared libs should not depend on feature libs const rule = nxProjectSlices() .matching('shared-*') .shouldNot() .dependOnSlices() .matching('feature-*'); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ## 📐 UML Diagram Support ArchUnitTS can validate your architecture against PlantUML diagrams, ensuring your code matches your architectural designs. ### Component Diagrams Validate component relationships using PlantUML component diagrams: ```typescript it('should adhere to component architecture', async () => { const diagram = ` @startuml component [UserInterface] as UI component [BusinessLogic] as BL component [DataAccess] as DA component [Database] as DB UI --> BL BL --> DA DA --> DB @enduml`; const rule = projectSlices() .definedBy('src/(**)/') // Group by folder structure .should() .adhereToDiagram(diagram); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Package Diagrams Enforce package dependencies with UML package diagrams: ```typescript it('should follow layered architecture diagram', async () => { const diagram = ` @startuml package "Presentation Layer" { [Controllers] [ViewModels] } package "Business Layer" { [Services] [Domain Models] } package "Data Layer" { [Repositories] [Entities] } [Controllers] --> [Services] [Services] --> [Repositories] [ViewModels] --> [Domain Models] @enduml`; const rule = projectSlices().definedBy('src/**/(**)').should().adhereToDiagram(diagram); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Class Diagrams Validate class relationships and inheritance hierarchies: ```typescript it('should match domain model diagram', async () => { const diagram = ` @startuml class User { +id: string +email: string +name: string } class Order { +id: string +userId: string +total: number } class OrderItem { +orderId: string +productId: string +quantity: number } User ||--o{ Order : places Order ||--o{ OrderItem : contains @enduml`; const rule = projectSlices() .definedBy('src/domain/(**)') .should() .adhereToDiagram(diagram); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Microservices Architecture Validate microservices boundaries with UML diagrams: ```typescript it('should respect microservices boundaries', async () => { const diagram = ` @startuml component [UserService] as US component [OrderService] as OS component [PaymentService] as PS component [NotificationService] as NS US --> OS : getUserOrders() OS --> PS : processPayment() OS --> NS : sendNotification() note right of US : No direct dependencies\nbetween services except\nthrough defined APIs @enduml`; const rule = projectSlices() .definedBy('services/(**)/') // Group by service folders .should() .adhereToDiagram(diagram); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ### Custom Architecture Diagrams Define and validate your own architectural patterns: ```typescript it('should follow hexagonal architecture', async () => { const diagram = ` @startuml hexagon "Application Core" as Core { component [Domain] component [Use Cases] } component [Web API] as Web component [Database] as DB component [External Service] as Ext Web --> Core : HTTP Core --> DB : Repository Core --> Ext : Gateway note top of Core : Business logic isolated\nfrom external concerns @enduml`; const rule = projectSlices().definedBy('src/(**)/').should().adhereToDiagram(diagram); await expect(rule).toPassAsync(); }); ``` ## 📊 Library Comparison Here's how ArchUnitTS compares to other TypeScript architecture testing libraries: | Feature | **ArchUnitTS** | **ts-arch** | **dependency-cruiser** | **arch-unit-ts** | | --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------ | | **API Stability** | ✅ Stable | ✅ Stable | ✅ Stable CLI/API | ⚠️ Unstable | | **Circular Dependency Detection** | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ No | | **Layer Dependency Rules** | ✅ Advanced patterns | ✅ Advanced patterns | ⚠️ Config-driven | ❌ No | | **File Pattern Matching** | ✅ Glob + Regex | ✅ Glob + Regex | ⚠️ Regex/config filters | ❌ Basic | | **Custom Rules** | ✅ Full support | ❌ No | ⚠️ Config rules | ❌ No | | **Code Metrics** | ✅ Comprehensive | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | | **Empty Test Detection** | ✅ Fails by default (configurable) | ❌ No | ❌ No test concept | ❌ No | | **Debug Logging** | ✅ Optional (off by default) | ❌ No | ⚠️ CLI progress | ❌ No | | **LCOM Cohesion Analysis** | ✅ Multiple algorithms | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | | **Distance Metrics** | ✅ Coupling & abstraction | ❌ No | ⚠️ Dependency metrics | ❌ No | | **UML Diagram Validation** | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ No | ❌ No | | **Architecture Slicing** | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ⚠️ Graph filtering | ❌ No | | **Testing Framework Integration** | ✅ Universal (Jest, Vitest, Jasmine, Mocha, etc.) | ⚠️ Jest only | ❌ CLI/API, no matcher | ⚠️ Basic | | **Dependency Graph Reports** | ✅ DOT, Mermaid, D2, CSV, JSON, HTML | ❌ No | ✅ Extensive CLI reports | ❌ No | | **HTML Report Generation** | ✅ Rich dashboards | ❌ No | ⚠️ Dependency reports | ❌ No | | **TypeScript AST Analysis** | ✅ Deep analysis | ⚠️ Basic | ⚠️ Dependency-focused | ⚠️ Basic | | **Performance Optimization** | ✅ Caching + parallel | ⚠️ Basic | ⚠️ CLI caching/filtering | ❌ No | | **Error Messages** | ✅ Detailed + clickable | ⚠️ Basic | ⚠️ CLI/CI reports | ⚠️ Basic | | **Documentation** | ✅ Comprehensive | ⚠️ Basic | ✅ Comprehensive | ⚠️ Minimal | | **Community Support** | ✅ Active maintenance | ⚠️ Infrequent | ✅ Active maintenance | ❌ Inactive | As you see in the table, there are some features that are only supported by us. Here is a brief highlight of those that we believe are the most critical of them: - **Empty Test Protection**: This one is extremely important. Let's say you define architectural boundaries that shall not be crossed - but you have a typo in the path to some folder. **Your test will just pass with other libraries!** They will _'check the rule'_ on _0 files_ and the test _'passes'_. ArchUnitTS detects this, we call it an _empty test_, and your test fails. This is the default behvaior, you can customize it to allow empty tests if you want to. - **Testing framework support**: ArchUnitTS works with any testing framework, plus we have special syntax extensions for Jest, Vitest and Jasmine. Other libraries such as ts-arch only have special support for Jest, or no special support at all. - **Logging**: We have great support for logs and different log levels. This can help to understand what files are being analyzed and why tests pass/fail. Other libraries have no logging support at all. - **Code Metrics**: Metrics such as cohesion, coupling metrics, distance from main sequence, and even custom metrics provide important insights into any projects code. ArchUnitTS is the only library with code metrics support. - **Intelligent Error Messages**: Our error messages contain clickable file paths and detailed violation descriptions. Again, other libraries do not have this. - **Custom rules**: ArchUnitTS is the only library that allows you to define custom rules and custom metrics. - **HTML Reports**: We support auto generated dashboards with charts and detailed breakdowns. Other libraries do not. ### ArchUnitTS vs Linters (ESLint plugins) Many developers wonder how ArchUnitTS compares to linter plugins like `eslint-plugin-import`. While both can validate dependencies between modules, **ArchUnitTS goes far beyond what linter plugins offer**: **What ArchUnitTS provides that linters don't:** - **Code Metrics Analysis**: LCOM (cohesion) metrics, cyclomatic complexity, coupling factor, abstractness, instability, distance from main sequence, and custom metrics - **Architecture Slices and Layers**: UML diagram validation, slice-to-slice dependency rules, multi-layer architecture validation - **Nx Monorepo Support**: Built-in validation against Nx project graphs, boundaries, and naming conventions - **HTML Report Generation**: Rich dashboards with charts and comprehensive architecture analysis reports - **Empty Test Protection**: Fails by default when no files match patterns (prevents false positives from typos) - **Custom Architecture Rules**: Define completely custom rules with arbitrary validation logic - **Test Framework Integration**: Works with ANY testing framework (Jest, Vitest, Jasmine, Mocha, etc.) with special async matchers - **Advanced Logging**: Multiple log levels, file logging for CI/CD, detailed violation tracking with timestamps - **Class-Level Analysis**: Analyze class structures, methods, fields, and cohesion - not just module imports - **Circular Dependency Detection with Context**: More granular control and better reporting than linter cycle detection **When to use linters:** Linters like `eslint-plugin-import` excel at: - **Real-time feedback** while coding - **Auto-fixing** certain issues automatically - **Simpler setup** with just ESLint configuration **The Bottom Line:** Use **eslint-plugin-import** if you want immediate feedback on import/export issues while coding. Use **ArchUnitTS** if you want comprehensive architecture testing, metrics analysis, declarative rules, and enforcing architectural boundaries as part of your test suite and CI/CD pipeline. ## 📢 Informative Error Messages When tests fail, you get helpful, colorful output with clickable file paths. https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/04b26afb-53e9-4507-ba24-c8308b3a7922 _Click on file paths to jump directly to the issue in your IDE._ ## 📝 Debug Logging & Configuration We support logging to help you understand what files are being analyzed and troubleshoot test failures. Logging is disabled by default to keep test output clean. ### Enabling Debug Logging ```typescript it('should respect layered architecture', async () => { const rule = projectFiles() .inFolder('src/presentation/**') .shouldNot() .dependOnFiles() .inFolder('src/database'); const options = { logging: { enabled: true, level: 'debug', // 'error' | 'warn' | 'info' | 'debug' }, }; await expect(rule).toPassAsync(options); }); ``` ### Sample Debug Output When debug logging is enabled, you'll see detailed information about the analysis: ``` [2025-06-02T12:08:26.355Z] [INFO] Starting architecture rule check: Dependency check: patterns [(^|.*/)src/database/.*] [2025-06-02T12:08:26.445Z] [DEBUG] Analyzing 12 files in 'src/presentation' folder [2025-06-02T12:08:26.456Z] [DEBUG] Found file: src/presentation/controllers/UserController.ts [2025-06-02T12:08:26.467Z] [DEBUG] Found file: src/presentation/views/UserView.tsx [2025-06-02T12:08:26.478Z] [DEBUG] Checking dependencies against 'src/database' pattern [2025-06-02T12:08:26.489Z] [DEBUG] Violation detected: src/presentation/controllers/UserController.ts depends on src/database/UserRepository.ts [2025-06-02T12:08:26.772Z] [WARN] Completed architecture rule check: Dependency check: patterns [(^|.*/)src/database/.*] (1 violations) ``` ### File Logging for CI/CD Integration (Beta) ArchUnitTS supports writing logs to files, making it super easy to integrate into CI pipelines and save logs as artifacts for debugging purposes. This is particularly useful for analyzing test failures in production environments. **This feature is in beta**. Note that if your testing framework runs tests in parallel, like Jest does for example, the log file may look confusing for large test suites. #### Basic File Logging ```typescript // Write logs to a specific file const options = { logging: { enabled: true, level: 'debug', logFile: true, }, }; await expect(rule).toPassAsync(options); ``` #### Easy CI Integration ```typescript // Automatically generates timestamped log files in ./logs/ const options = { logging: { enabled: true, level: 'info', logFile: true, // Creates logs/archunit-YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS.log }, }; await expect(rule).toPassAsync(options); ``` When `logFile: true`, ArchUnitTS automatically: - Creates a `logs/` directory if it doesn't exist - Generates timestamped log files like `archunit-2025-06-06_14-30-45.log` - Includes session headers with start times - Formats all log messages with timestamps and log levels #### CI Pipeline Integration Example This makes it incredibly easy to save logs as CI artifacts for debugging: ```yaml # GitHub Actions example - name: Run Architecture Tests run: npm test - name: Upload Test Logs if: always() uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 with: name: architecture-test-logs path: logs/ ``` ```yaml # GitLab CI example test: script: - npm test artifacts: when: always paths: - logs/ expire_in: 1 week ``` ## 🏈 Architecture Fitness Functions The features of ArchUnitTS can very well be used as architectural fitness functions. See [here](https://www.thoughtworks.com/en-de/insights/articles/fitness-function-driven-development) for more information about that topic. ## 🔲 Core Modules ArchUnitTS has the following core modules. | Module | Description | Status | Links | | ----------- | ------------------------------------ | ------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Files** | File and folder based rules | Stable | [`src/files/`](src/files/) • [README](src/files/README.md) | | **Metrics** | Code quality metrics | Stable | [`src/metrics/`](src/metrics/) • [README](src/metrics/README.md) | | **Slices** | Architecture slicing | Stable | [`src/slices/`](src/slices/) • [README](src/slices/README.md) | | **Graph** | Dependency graph reports and queries | Experimental | [`src/graph/`](src/graph/) | | **Testing** | Universal test framework integration | Stable | [`src/testing/`](src/testing/) • [README](src/testing/README.md) | | **Common** | Shared utilities | Stable | [`src/common/`](src/common/) | | **Reports** | Generate reports | Experimental | [`src/metrics/fluentapi/export-utils.ts`](src/metrics/fluentapi/export-utils.ts) | ## 🕵️ Technical Deep Dive How does ArchUnitTS work under the hood? See [here](info/TECHNICAL.md) for a deep dive! ### ArchUnitTS uses ArchUnitTS We used ourselves to ensure the architectural rules for this repository 😎 ## 🦊 Contributing We highly appreciate contributions. We use GitHub Flow, meaning that we use feature branches, similar to GitFlow, but with proper CI and CD. As soon as something is merged or pushed to `main` it gets deployed (docs are updated and the package is published to npm). Versioning is automated via [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) — use `fix:` for patches, `feat:` for minor releases, and `feat!:` or `BREAKING CHANGE:` for major releases. See more in [Contributing](CONTRIBUTING.md). See also our _'[Backlog](TODO.md)'_. ## ℹ️ FAQ **Q: What TypeScript/JavaScript testing frameworks are supported?** ArchUnitTS works with Jest, Jasmine, Vitest, Mocha, and any other testing framework. We have added special syntax support for Jest, Jasmine and Vitest, namely `toPassAsync` but, as said, ArchUnitTS works with any existing testing framework. **Q: Can I use ArchUnitTS with JavaScript projects?** Yes! While ArchUnitTS is built for TypeScript, it works with JavaScript projects too. You'll get the most benefit with TypeScript due to better static analysis capabilities. **Q: How do I handle false positives in architecture rules?** Use the filtering and targeting capabilities to exclude specific files or patterns. You can filter by file paths, class names, or custom predicates to fine-tune your rules. **Q: What's the difference between file-based and class-based rules?** File-based rules analyze import relationships between files, while class-based rules examine dependencies between classes and their members. Choose based on your architecture validation needs. ## 📅 Plans We want to extract a core engine and provide the same functionality not just for TypeScript, but also languages like Python, Go and more. Furthermore, we are planning to develop an LLM-based architecture testing library. For more info on that concept, please read [this](https://lukasniessen.com/blog/155-fitness-functions-guide/#llms-for-fuzzy-fitness-functions). ## 🐣 Origin Story While working as a consultant on an Express backend project, I needed to implement architectural fitness functions similar to how one can do it with ArchUnit. Finding no good TypeScript library for this purpose, I decided to build ArchUnitTS. With the rise of LLMs and AI integration in companies, enforcing architectural boundaries and QA in general has become more critical than ever. ## 💟 Community ### Maintainers • **[LukasNiessen](https://github.com/LukasNiessen)** - Creator and main maintainer • **[janMagnusHeimann](https://github.com/janMagnusHeimann)** - Maintainer • **[TristanKruse](https://github.com/TristanKruse)** - Maintainer ### Contributors <a href="https://github.com/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS/graphs/contributors"> <img src="https://contrib.rocks/image?repo=LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS&max=1000&contributors=10" /> </a> ### Questions Found a bug? Want to discuss features? - Submit an [issue on GitHub](https://github.com/LukasNiessen/ArchUnitTS/issues/new/choo