UNPKG

aiwg

Version:

Deployment tool and support utility for AI context. Copies agents, skills, commands, rules, and behaviors into the paths each AI platform reads (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Warp, OpenClaw, and 6 more) so one source of truth works across 10 platfo

110 lines (75 loc) 3.13 kB
# Quick Reference for AI Agents ## Before Writing: The 5-Second Check 1. **Am I about to write "seamlessly" or "crucial role"?** → Stop 2. **Am I starting with "Moreover" or "Furthermore"?** → Don't 3. **Am I being specific with numbers?** → You should be 4. **Does this sound like marketing?** → Rewrite 5. **Would I say this to a colleague?** → This is the test ## The Core Formula Formula: Expert talking to peer + specific details + real trade-offs = authentic content ## Instant Fixes | If you wrote... | Write this instead... | |-----------------|----------------------| | "significantly improved" | "cut response time from 2s to 200ms" | | "comprehensive solution" | "handles payments, refunds, and disputes" | | "seamlessly integrates" | "works with Stripe and PayPal" | | "innovative approach" | "used GraphQL instead of REST" | | "Moreover," | [just start the next sentence] | | "plays a crucial role" | "handles authentication" | | "robust system" | "99.9% uptime over 2 years" | | "cutting-edge technology" | "uses React 18 and Next.js 14" | ## Voice Calibration ### Too Formal (AI-like) > "Furthermore, the implementation leverages cutting-edge methodologies to deliver transformative results." ### Too Casual > "So like, we basically just hacked together some stuff and it worked lol" ### Just Right > "We used event sourcing for the audit trail. Overkill? Maybe. But compliance required immutable logs." ## Structure Checklist - [ ] Paragraphs vary in length (1-5 sentences) - [ ] Not every section has an introduction - [ ] No summary paragraphs - [ ] Different paragraph openings - [ ] Mix of sentence lengths ## Natural Transitions Instead of formal conjunctions: - "The payment system..." (just name the topic) - "Back in 2020..." (time marker) - "Why TypeScript?" (question) - "Turns out..." (discovery) - "Problem was..." (direct statement) ## Authenticity Markers Add at least one per section: - **Opinion**: "Redis is overkill for session storage" - **Trade-off**: "Chose speed over consistency" - **Reality check**: "The migration took 3 months, not the planned 3 weeks" - **Context**: "Friday deadline meant going with the quick fix" - **Learning**: "Should've used Postgres from the start" ## Numbers to Include Be specific: - Percentages: "reduced by 73%" - Time: "in 18 minutes" - Money: "$450K under budget" - Scale: "12 million daily users" - Technical: "p95 latency of 200ms" ## Final Pre-Submit Check 1. **Search for "seamlessly"** - Delete it 2. **Search for "Moreover"** - Remove it 3. **Search for "comprehensive"** - Be specific 4. **Count em-dashes** - Maximum 1-2 5. **Read aloud** - Does it sound human? ## The One Rule **Write like you're explaining your actual work, not like you're trying to impress anyone.** ## Emergency Rewrite If something sounds too AI-like, try: 1. Cut it in half 2. Add a specific number 3. Include what went wrong 4. State an opinion 5. Remove all adjectives ## Remember - You're not Wikipedia - You're not marketing - You're not writing a paper - You're an expert sharing knowledge That's it. Now write like a human.