aiwg
Version:
Cognitive architecture for AI-augmented software development with structured memory, ensemble validation, and closed-loop correction. FAIR-aligned artifacts, 84% cost reduction via human-in-the-loop, standards adopted by 100+ organizations.
305 lines (205 loc) • 6.73 kB
Markdown
# Competitive Battlecard
**Card ID**: `SLS-{PROJECT}-{NNNN}`
**Version**: 1.0
**Status**: Draft | Current | Outdated
**Competitor**: {COMPETITOR_NAME}
**Last Updated**: {DATE}
**Owner**: {OWNER_NAME}
## Quick Reference
### At a Glance
| Attribute | Us | {Competitor} |
|-----------|-----|--------------|
| Positioning | {Our position} | {Their position} |
| Target market | {Our focus} | {Their focus} |
| Key strength | {Our advantage} | {Their advantage} |
| Key weakness | {Our gap} | {Their gap} |
| Pricing | {Our model} | {Their model} |
### When We Win
- {Scenario 1 where we typically win}
- {Scenario 2 where we typically win}
- {Scenario 3 where we typically win}
### When We Lose
- {Scenario 1 where we may lose}
- {Scenario 2 where we may lose}
- {Scenario 3 where we may lose}
## Competitor Overview
### Company Profile
| Attribute | Detail |
|-----------|--------|
| Founded | {Year} |
| Headquarters | {Location} |
| Employees | {Number} |
| Funding/Revenue | {Amount} |
| Key customers | {Notable logos} |
| Recent news | {Recent developments} |
### Product Summary
{2-3 sentence description of their product/service}
### Their Messaging
**Tagline**: "{Their tagline}"
**Key claims**:
- {Claim 1}
- {Claim 2}
- {Claim 3}
## Feature Comparison
### Core Capabilities
| Capability | Us | {Competitor} | Notes |
|------------|-----|--------------|-------|
| {Feature 1} | ✓ Full | ✓ Partial | {Context} |
| {Feature 2} | ✓ Full | ✗ No | {Our advantage} |
| {Feature 3} | ✓ Full | ✓ Full | {Parity} |
| {Feature 4} | ✗ Roadmap | ✓ Full | {Their advantage} |
| {Feature 5} | ✓ Full | ✓ Limited | {Context} |
### Technical Comparison
| Aspect | Us | {Competitor} |
|--------|-----|--------------|
| Architecture | {Our approach} | {Their approach} |
| Deployment | {Options} | {Options} |
| Integrations | {Count/key ones} | {Count/key ones} |
| API | {Capabilities} | {Capabilities} |
| Security | {Certifications} | {Certifications} |
## Pricing Comparison
### Pricing Models
| Aspect | Us | {Competitor} |
|--------|-----|--------------|
| Model | {Per user, flat, usage} | {Their model} |
| Entry price | ${Amount} | ${Amount} |
| Enterprise | ${Range} | ${Range} |
| Free tier | {Yes/No} | {Yes/No} |
| Contract | {Terms} | {Terms} |
### Hidden Costs to Highlight
- {Their hidden cost 1}
- {Their hidden cost 2}
- {Setup/implementation fees}
- {Support tier pricing}
## Strengths & Weaknesses
### Their Strengths
| Strength | Impact | Our Response |
|----------|--------|--------------|
| {Strength 1} | {Why it matters} | {How we counter} |
| {Strength 2} | {Why it matters} | {How we counter} |
| {Strength 3} | {Why it matters} | {How we counter} |
### Their Weaknesses
| Weakness | Impact | How We Capitalize |
|----------|--------|-------------------|
| {Weakness 1} | {Customer pain} | {Our advantage} |
| {Weakness 2} | {Customer pain} | {Our advantage} |
| {Weakness 3} | {Customer pain} | {Our advantage} |
## Objection Handling
### "They have {Feature X}"
**Their claim**: {What they say}
**Reality check**: {The actual truth}
**Our response**:
> "{Suggested talk track}"
### "They're cheaper"
**Their claim**: {Price comparison they make}
**Reality check**: {TCO analysis, hidden costs}
**Our response**:
> "{Suggested talk track}"
### "They're more established"
**Their claim**: {Market presence argument}
**Reality check**: {Our credibility points}
**Our response**:
> "{Suggested talk track}"
### "We already use {Competitor}"
**Situation**: Incumbent displacement
**Our approach**:
- {Discovery questions to ask}
- {Pain points to explore}
- {Switching costs to address}
**Our response**:
> "{Suggested talk track}"
## Landmine Questions
### Questions to Ask Early
Ask these to create doubt about the competitor:
1. **"{Question about their weakness 1}?"**
- Purpose: Expose {gap area}
- Their likely answer: {What they'll say}
- Follow-up: {How to probe deeper}
2. **"{Question about their weakness 2}?"**
- Purpose: Expose {gap area}
- Their likely answer: {What they'll say}
- Follow-up: {How to probe deeper}
3. **"{Question about their weakness 3}?"**
- Purpose: Expose {gap area}
- Their likely answer: {What they'll say}
- Follow-up: {How to probe deeper}
### Questions They'll Ask About Us
| Question | Best Response |
|----------|---------------|
| "{Question about our weakness}" | {How to respond} |
| "{Question about their strength}" | {How to respond} |
| "{Pricing question}" | {How to respond} |
## Competitive Proof Points
### Customer Wins Against {Competitor}
| Customer | Industry | Why They Switched |
|----------|----------|-------------------|
| {Customer 1} | {Industry} | {Key reason} |
| {Customer 2} | {Industry} | {Key reason} |
| {Customer 3} | {Industry} | {Key reason} |
### Win Quotes
> "{Quote from customer who switched from competitor}"
> — {Customer Name}, {Title}, {Company}
### Third-Party Validation
| Source | Finding |
|--------|---------|
| {Analyst report} | {What they said} |
| {Review site} | {Rating comparison} |
| {Award} | {Recognition} |
## Tactical Playbook
### Early Stage (Discovery)
- [ ] Ask landmine questions early
- [ ] Understand their selection criteria
- [ ] Identify who's championing competitor
- [ ] Get budget and timeline
### Mid Stage (Evaluation)
- [ ] Request head-to-head demo
- [ ] Provide relevant case studies
- [ ] Connect with reference customers
- [ ] Address technical requirements
### Late Stage (Decision)
- [ ] Summarize differentiation
- [ ] Address remaining concerns
- [ ] Negotiate from value position
- [ ] Secure executive sponsorship
## Resources
### Sales Tools
| Resource | Link | Use Case |
|----------|------|----------|
| Comparison one-pager | {Link} | Leave-behind |
| Win story deck | {Link} | Displacement deals |
| ROI calculator | {Link} | Pricing discussions |
| Demo script | {Link} | Competitive demo |
### Customer References
| Customer | Industry | Contact | Use For |
|----------|----------|---------|---------|
| {Customer} | {Industry} | {Name} | {Scenario} |
## Intelligence Updates
### Recent Developments
| Date | Update | Impact |
|------|--------|--------|
| {Date} | {News item} | {What it means} |
| {Date} | {Product release} | {Competitive impact} |
| {Date} | {Market move} | {How to respond} |
### Update Requests
Have new competitive intel? Submit to: {competitive-intel@company.com}
## Version History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---------|------|--------|---------|
| 1.0 | {DATE} | {Name} | Initial battlecard |
*Template version: 1.0 | MMK Framework*