UNPKG

aiwg

Version:

Cognitive architecture for AI-augmented software development with structured memory, ensemble validation, and closed-loop correction. FAIR-aligned artifacts, 84% cost reduction via human-in-the-loop, standards adopted by 100+ organizations.

346 lines (243 loc) 7.89 kB
# Win/Loss Analysis Report **Card ID**: `PMK-{PROJECT}-{NNNN}` **Version**: 1.0 **Period**: {START_DATE} to {END_DATE} **Product**: {PRODUCT_NAME} **Owner**: {OWNER_NAME} --- ## Executive Summary ### Key Findings {3-5 bullet summary of most important insights} ### Win Rate Trend | Period | Opportunities | Wins | Win Rate | Trend | |--------|---------------|------|----------|-------| | {Current} | {#} | {#} | {%} | {↑/↓/→} | | {Previous} | {#} | {#} | {%} | | | {YoY} | {#} | {#} | {%} | | ### Top Actions | Priority | Action | Owner | Impact | |----------|--------|-------|--------| | 1 | {Action} | {Name} | {Expected impact} | | 2 | {Action} | {Name} | {Expected impact} | | 3 | {Action} | {Name} | {Expected impact} | --- ## Win Analysis ### Win Rate by Segment | Segment | Opportunities | Wins | Win Rate | |---------|---------------|------|----------| | {Segment 1} | {#} | {#} | {%} | | {Segment 2} | {#} | {#} | {%} | | {Segment 3} | {#} | {#} | {%} | ### Win Rate by Deal Size | Deal Size | Opportunities | Wins | Win Rate | |-----------|---------------|------|----------| | <$10K | {#} | {#} | {%} | | $10K-$50K | {#} | {#} | {%} | | $50K-$100K | {#} | {#} | {%} | | >$100K | {#} | {#} | {%} | ### Win Rate by Competitor | Competitor | Head-to-Head | Wins | Win Rate | |------------|--------------|------|----------| | {Competitor 1} | {#} | {#} | {%} | | {Competitor 2} | {#} | {#} | {%} | | {Competitor 3} | {#} | {#} | {%} | | No competition | {#} | {#} | {%} | --- ## Why We Win ### Top Win Factors | Factor | Frequency | Impact | |--------|-----------|--------| | {Factor 1} | {%} of wins | High | | {Factor 2} | {%} of wins | High | | {Factor 3} | {%} of wins | Medium | | {Factor 4} | {%} of wins | Medium | ### Win Factor Details **{Factor 1}: {Name}** - Description: {What this factor is} - Customer quotes: > "{Verbatim quote}" - Implications: {What this means for GTM} **{Factor 2}: {Name}** {Repeat structure} ### Competitive Win Reasons | vs. Competitor | Primary Win Reason | Supporting Reasons | |----------------|-------------------|-------------------| | {Competitor 1} | {Main reason} | {Other factors} | | {Competitor 2} | {Main reason} | {Other factors} | --- ## Why We Lose ### Top Loss Factors | Factor | Frequency | Addressable? | |--------|-----------|--------------| | {Factor 1} | {%} of losses | Yes/Partial/No | | {Factor 2} | {%} of losses | Yes/Partial/No | | {Factor 3} | {%} of losses | Yes/Partial/No | | {Factor 4} | {%} of losses | Yes/Partial/No | ### Loss Factor Details **{Factor 1}: {Name}** - Description: {What this factor is} - Customer quotes: > "{Verbatim quote}" - Root cause: {Underlying issue} - Recommendation: {How to address} **{Factor 2}: {Name}** {Repeat structure} ### Competitive Loss Reasons | to Competitor | Primary Loss Reason | Their Advantage | |---------------|--------------------|-----------------| | {Competitor 1} | {Main reason} | {What they do better} | | {Competitor 2} | {Main reason} | {What they do better} | ### No-Decision Analysis | Reason | Frequency | |--------|-----------| | Budget frozen | {%} | | Priority shifted | {%} | | Internal solution | {%} | | Timing | {%} | | Champion left | {%} | --- ## Competitive Intelligence ### Competitor Comparison (from buyer feedback) | Attribute | Us | Comp 1 | Comp 2 | |-----------|-----|--------|--------| | Product capabilities | {Rating} | {Rating} | {Rating} | | Ease of use | {Rating} | {Rating} | {Rating} | | Price/value | {Rating} | {Rating} | {Rating} | | Support | {Rating} | {Rating} | {Rating} | | Integration | {Rating} | {Rating} | {Rating} | | Brand trust | {Rating} | {Rating} | {Rating} | ### Competitive Trends | Competitor | Trend | Implication | |------------|-------|-------------| | {Competitor 1} | {What changed} | {Impact on us} | | {Competitor 2} | {What changed} | {Impact on us} | --- ## Pricing Analysis ### Price Sensitivity | Outcome | Average Deal Size | Price as Factor | |---------|-------------------|-----------------| | Wins | ${Amount} | {%} cited price | | Losses | ${Amount} | {%} cited price | ### Discount Analysis | Discount Range | Win Rate | Average Deal Size | |----------------|----------|-------------------| | No discount | {%} | ${Amount} | | 1-10% | {%} | ${Amount} | | 11-20% | {%} | ${Amount} | | 21%+ | {%} | ${Amount} | ### Price Positioning | vs. Competitor | Our Perception | Reality | |----------------|----------------|---------| | {Competitor 1} | {How we're seen} | {Actual} | | {Competitor 2} | {How we're seen} | {Actual} | --- ## Sales Process Insights ### Deal Velocity | Outcome | Avg Days | Stages | |---------|----------|--------| | Wins | {Days} | {Avg stages} | | Losses | {Days} | {Avg stages} | ### Stage Conversion | Stage | Entry | Exit | Conversion | |-------|-------|------|------------| | Discovery | {#} | {#} | {%} | | Demo | {#} | {#} | {%} | | Proposal | {#} | {#} | {%} | | Negotiation | {#} | {#} | {%} | | Closed | {#} | - | - | ### Winning Behaviors | Behavior | Win Rate Impact | |----------|-----------------| | {Behavior 1} | +{%} win rate | | {Behavior 2} | +{%} win rate | | {Behavior 3} | +{%} win rate | --- ## Product Feedback ### Feature Gaps Cited | Feature Gap | Frequency | Impact | Roadmap Status | |-------------|-----------|--------|----------------| | {Gap 1} | {#} mentions | High | {Status} | | {Gap 2} | {#} mentions | Medium | {Status} | | {Gap 3} | {#} mentions | Low | {Status} | ### Product Strengths Cited | Strength | Frequency | |----------|-----------| | {Strength 1} | {#} mentions | | {Strength 2} | {#} mentions | | {Strength 3} | {#} mentions | ### Integration Requests | Integration | Frequency | Competitor Has? | |-------------|-----------|-----------------| | {Integration 1} | {#} | Yes/No | | {Integration 2} | {#} | Yes/No | --- ## Recommendations ### For Product | Recommendation | Priority | Expected Impact | |----------------|----------|-----------------| | {Rec 1} | High | {Impact} | | {Rec 2} | Medium | {Impact} | | {Rec 3} | Medium | {Impact} | ### For Marketing | Recommendation | Priority | Expected Impact | |----------------|----------|-----------------| | {Rec 1} | High | {Impact} | | {Rec 2} | Medium | {Impact} | | {Rec 3} | Medium | {Impact} | ### For Sales | Recommendation | Priority | Expected Impact | |----------------|----------|-----------------| | {Rec 1} | High | {Impact} | | {Rec 2} | Medium | {Impact} | | {Rec 3} | Medium | {Impact} | ### For Pricing | Recommendation | Priority | Expected Impact | |----------------|----------|-----------------| | {Rec 1} | {Priority} | {Impact} | --- ## Methodology ### Data Sources | Source | Sample | |--------|--------| | Win interviews | {#} | | Loss interviews | {#} | | No-decision interviews | {#} | | CRM data | {#} opportunities | | Sales surveys | {#} responses | ### Interview Process - Interview timing: {When post-decision} - Interview method: {Phone/Video/Survey} - Interviewer: {Internal/Third-party} - Average duration: {Minutes} ### Sample Profile | Attribute | Distribution | |-----------|--------------| | Deal size | {Breakdown} | | Industry | {Breakdown} | | Company size | {Breakdown} | | Competitor | {Breakdown} | --- ## Appendix ### A. Representative Win Story **{Customer Name}** - Industry: {Industry} - Deal size: ${Amount} - Competitors: {Who} - Decision factors: {Key reasons} - Quote: "{Customer quote}" ### B. Representative Loss Story **{Prospect Name}** - Industry: {Industry} - Deal size: ${Amount} - Won by: {Competitor} - Decision factors: {Key reasons} - Quote: "{Prospect quote}" ### C. Full Data Tables {Link to detailed data} --- ## Version History | Version | Date | Author | Changes | |---------|------|--------|---------| | 1.0 | {DATE} | {Name} | Initial report | --- *Template version: 1.0 | MMK Framework*