UNPKG

aios-core

Version:

Synkra AIOS: AI-Orchestrated System for Full Stack Development - Core Framework

319 lines (228 loc) 8.74 kB
# advanced-elicitation ## Execution Modes **Choose your execution mode:** ### 1. YOLO Mode - Fast, Autonomous (0-1 prompts) - Autonomous decision making with logging - Minimal user interaction - **Best for:** Simple, deterministic tasks ### 2. Interactive Mode - Balanced, Educational (5-10 prompts) **[DEFAULT]** - Explicit decision checkpoints - Educational explanations - **Best for:** Learning, complex decisions ### 3. Pre-Flight Planning - Comprehensive Upfront Planning - Task analysis phase (identify all ambiguities) - Zero ambiguity execution - **Best for:** Ambiguous requirements, critical work **Parameter:** `mode` (optional, default: `interactive`) --- ## Task Definition (AIOS Task Format V1.0) ```yaml task: advancedElicitation() responsible: Atlas (Decoder) responsible_type: Agent atomic_layer: Strategy inputs: - field: task type: string source: User Input required: true validation: Must be registered task - field: parameters type: object source: User Input required: false validation: Valid task parameters - field: mode type: string source: User Input required: false validation: yolo|interactive|pre-flight outputs: - field: execution_result type: object destination: Memory persisted: false - field: logs type: array destination: File (.ai/logs/*) persisted: true - field: state type: object destination: State management persisted: true ``` --- ## Pre-Conditions **Purpose:** Validate prerequisites BEFORE task execution (blocking) **Checklist:** ```yaml pre-conditions: - [ ] Task is registered; required parameters provided; dependencies met tipo: pre-condition blocker: true validação: | Check task is registered; required parameters provided; dependencies met error_message: "Pre-condition failed: Task is registered; required parameters provided; dependencies met" ``` --- ## Post-Conditions **Purpose:** Validate execution success AFTER task completes **Checklist:** ```yaml post-conditions: - [ ] Task completed; exit code 0; expected outputs created tipo: post-condition blocker: true validação: | Verify task completed; exit code 0; expected outputs created error_message: "Post-condition failed: Task completed; exit code 0; expected outputs created" ``` --- ## Acceptance Criteria **Purpose:** Definitive pass/fail criteria for task completion **Checklist:** ```yaml acceptance-criteria: - [ ] Task completed as expected; side effects documented tipo: acceptance-criterion blocker: true validação: | Assert task completed as expected; side effects documented error_message: "Acceptance criterion not met: Task completed as expected; side effects documented" ``` --- ## Tools **External/shared resources used by this task:** - **Tool:** task-runner - **Purpose:** Task execution and orchestration - **Source:** .aios-core/core/task-runner.js - **Tool:** logger - **Purpose:** Execution logging and error tracking - **Source:** .aios-core/utils/logger.js --- ## Scripts **Agent-specific code for this task:** - **Script:** execute-task.js - **Purpose:** Generic task execution wrapper - **Language:** JavaScript - **Location:** .aios-core/scripts/execute-task.js --- ## Error Handling **Strategy:** retry **Common Errors:** 1. **Error:** Task Not Found - **Cause:** Specified task not registered in system - **Resolution:** Verify task name and registration - **Recovery:** List available tasks, suggest similar 2. **Error:** Invalid Parameters - **Cause:** Task parameters do not match expected schema - **Resolution:** Validate parameters against task definition - **Recovery:** Provide parameter template, reject execution 3. **Error:** Execution Timeout - **Cause:** Task exceeds maximum execution time - **Resolution:** Optimize task or increase timeout - **Recovery:** Kill task, cleanup resources, log state --- ## Performance **Expected Metrics:** ```yaml duration_expected: 5-20 min (estimated) cost_estimated: $0.003-0.015 token_usage: ~2,000-8,000 tokens ``` **Optimization Notes:** - Iterative analysis with depth limits; cache intermediate results; batch similar operations --- ## Metadata ```yaml story: N/A version: 1.0.0 dependencies: - N/A tags: - automation - workflow updated_at: 2025-11-17 ``` --- ## Purpose - Provide optional reflective and brainstorming actions to enhance content quality - Enable deeper exploration of ideas through structured elicitation techniques - Support iterative refinement through multiple analytical perspectives - Usable during template-driven document creation or any chat conversation ## Usage Scenarios ### Scenario 1: Template Document Creation After outputting a section during document creation: 1. **Section Review**: Ask user to review the drafted section 2. **Offer Elicitation**: Present 9 carefully selected elicitation methods 3. **Simple Selection**: User types a number (0-8) to engage method, or 9 to proceed 4. **Execute & Loop**: Apply selected method, then re-offer choices until user proceeds ### Scenario 2: General Chat Elicitation User can request advanced elicitation on any agent output: - User says "do advanced elicitation" or similar - Agent selects 9 relevant methods for the context - Same simple 0-9 selection process ## Task Instructions ### 1. Intelligent Method Selection **Context Analysis**: Before presenting options, analyze: - **Content Type**: Technical specs, user stories, architecture, requirements, etc. - **Complexity Level**: Simple, moderate, or complex content - **Stakeholder Needs**: Who will use this information - **Risk Level**: High-impact decisions vs routine items - **Creative Potential**: Opportunities for innovation or alternatives **Method Selection Strategy**: 1. **Always Include Core Methods** (choose 3-4): - Expand or Contract for Audience - Critique and Refine - Identify Potential Risks - Assess Alignment with Goals 2. **Context-Specific Methods** (choose 4-5): - **Technical Content**: Tree of Thoughts, ReWOO, Meta-Prompting - **User-Facing Content**: Agile Team Perspective, Stakeholder Roundtable - **Creative Content**: Innovation Tournament, Escape Room Challenge - **Strategic Content**: Red Team vs Blue Team, Hindsight Reflection 3. **Always Include**: "Proceed / No Further Actions" as option 9 ### 2. Section Context and Review When invoked after outputting a section: 1. **Provide Context Summary**: Give a brief 1-2 sentence summary of what the user should look for in the section just presented 2. **Explain Visual Elements**: If the section contains diagrams, explain them briefly before offering elicitation options 3. **Clarify Scope Options**: If the section contains multiple distinct items, inform the user they can apply elicitation actions to: - The entire section as a whole - Individual items within the section (specify which item when selecting an action) ### 3. Present Elicitation Options **Review Request Process:** - Ask the user to review the drafted section - In the SAME message, inform them they can suggest direct changes OR select an elicitation method - Present 9 intelligently selected methods (0-8) plus "Proceed" (9) - Keep descriptions short - just the method name - Await simple numeric selection **Action List Presentation Format:** ```text **Advanced Elicitation Options** Choose a number (0-8) or 9 to proceed: 0. [Method Name] 1. [Method Name] 2. [Method Name] 3. [Method Name] 4. [Method Name] 5. [Method Name] 6. [Method Name] 7. [Method Name] 8. [Method Name] 9. Proceed / No Further Actions ``` **Response Handling:** - **Numbers 0-8**: Execute the selected method, then re-offer the choice - **Number 9**: Proceed to next section or continue conversation - **Direct Feedback**: Apply user's suggested changes and continue ### 4. Method Execution Framework **Execution Process:** 1. **Retrieve Method**: Access the specific elicitation method from the elicitation-methods data file 2. **Apply Context**: Execute the method from your current role's perspective 3. **Provide Results**: Deliver insights, critiques, or alternatives relevant to the content 4. **Re-offer Choice**: Present the same 9 options again until user selects 9 or gives direct feedback **Execution Guidelines:** - **Be Concise**: Focus on actionable insights, not lengthy explanations - **Stay Relevant**: Tie all elicitation back to the specific content being analyzed - **Identify Personas**: For multi-persona methods, clearly identify which viewpoint is speaking - **Maintain Flow**: Keep the process moving efficiently