aios-core
Version:
Synkra AIOS: AI-Orchestrated System for Full Stack Development - Core Framework
319 lines (228 loc) • 8.74 kB
Markdown
# advanced-elicitation
## Execution Modes
**Choose your execution mode:**
### 1. YOLO Mode - Fast, Autonomous (0-1 prompts)
- Autonomous decision making with logging
- Minimal user interaction
- **Best for:** Simple, deterministic tasks
### 2. Interactive Mode - Balanced, Educational (5-10 prompts) **[DEFAULT]**
- Explicit decision checkpoints
- Educational explanations
- **Best for:** Learning, complex decisions
### 3. Pre-Flight Planning - Comprehensive Upfront Planning
- Task analysis phase (identify all ambiguities)
- Zero ambiguity execution
- **Best for:** Ambiguous requirements, critical work
**Parameter:** `mode` (optional, default: `interactive`)
## Task Definition (AIOS Task Format V1.0)
```yaml
task: advancedElicitation()
responsible: Atlas (Decoder)
responsible_type: Agent
atomic_layer: Strategy
inputs:
- field: task
type: string
source: User Input
required: true
validation: Must be registered task
- field: parameters
type: object
source: User Input
required: false
validation: Valid task parameters
- field: mode
type: string
source: User Input
required: false
validation: yolo|interactive|pre-flight
outputs:
- field: execution_result
type: object
destination: Memory
persisted: false
- field: logs
type: array
destination: File (.ai/logs/*)
persisted: true
- field: state
type: object
destination: State management
persisted: true
```
## Pre-Conditions
**Purpose:** Validate prerequisites BEFORE task execution (blocking)
**Checklist:**
```yaml
pre-conditions:
- [ ] Task is registered; required parameters provided; dependencies met
tipo: pre-condition
blocker: true
validação: |
Check task is registered; required parameters provided; dependencies met
error_message: "Pre-condition failed: Task is registered; required parameters provided; dependencies met"
```
## Post-Conditions
**Purpose:** Validate execution success AFTER task completes
**Checklist:**
```yaml
post-conditions:
- [ ] Task completed; exit code 0; expected outputs created
tipo: post-condition
blocker: true
validação: |
Verify task completed; exit code 0; expected outputs created
error_message: "Post-condition failed: Task completed; exit code 0; expected outputs created"
```
## Acceptance Criteria
**Purpose:** Definitive pass/fail criteria for task completion
**Checklist:**
```yaml
acceptance-criteria:
- [ ] Task completed as expected; side effects documented
tipo: acceptance-criterion
blocker: true
validação: |
Assert task completed as expected; side effects documented
error_message: "Acceptance criterion not met: Task completed as expected; side effects documented"
```
## Tools
**External/shared resources used by this task:**
- **Tool:** task-runner
- **Purpose:** Task execution and orchestration
- **Source:** .aios-core/core/task-runner.js
- **Tool:** logger
- **Purpose:** Execution logging and error tracking
- **Source:** .aios-core/utils/logger.js
## Scripts
**Agent-specific code for this task:**
- **Script:** execute-task.js
- **Purpose:** Generic task execution wrapper
- **Language:** JavaScript
- **Location:** .aios-core/scripts/execute-task.js
## Error Handling
**Strategy:** retry
**Common Errors:**
1. **Error:** Task Not Found
- **Cause:** Specified task not registered in system
- **Resolution:** Verify task name and registration
- **Recovery:** List available tasks, suggest similar
2. **Error:** Invalid Parameters
- **Cause:** Task parameters do not match expected schema
- **Resolution:** Validate parameters against task definition
- **Recovery:** Provide parameter template, reject execution
3. **Error:** Execution Timeout
- **Cause:** Task exceeds maximum execution time
- **Resolution:** Optimize task or increase timeout
- **Recovery:** Kill task, cleanup resources, log state
## Performance
**Expected Metrics:**
```yaml
duration_expected: 5-20 min (estimated)
cost_estimated: $0.003-0.015
token_usage: ~2,000-8,000 tokens
```
**Optimization Notes:**
- Iterative analysis with depth limits; cache intermediate results; batch similar operations
## Metadata
```yaml
story: N/A
version: 1.0.0
dependencies:
- N/A
tags:
- automation
- workflow
updated_at: 2025-11-17
```
## Purpose
- Provide optional reflective and brainstorming actions to enhance content quality
- Enable deeper exploration of ideas through structured elicitation techniques
- Support iterative refinement through multiple analytical perspectives
- Usable during template-driven document creation or any chat conversation
## Usage Scenarios
### Scenario 1: Template Document Creation
After outputting a section during document creation:
1. **Section Review**: Ask user to review the drafted section
2. **Offer Elicitation**: Present 9 carefully selected elicitation methods
3. **Simple Selection**: User types a number (0-8) to engage method, or 9 to proceed
4. **Execute & Loop**: Apply selected method, then re-offer choices until user proceeds
### Scenario 2: General Chat Elicitation
User can request advanced elicitation on any agent output:
- User says "do advanced elicitation" or similar
- Agent selects 9 relevant methods for the context
- Same simple 0-9 selection process
## Task Instructions
### 1. Intelligent Method Selection
**Context Analysis**: Before presenting options, analyze:
- **Content Type**: Technical specs, user stories, architecture, requirements, etc.
- **Complexity Level**: Simple, moderate, or complex content
- **Stakeholder Needs**: Who will use this information
- **Risk Level**: High-impact decisions vs routine items
- **Creative Potential**: Opportunities for innovation or alternatives
**Method Selection Strategy**:
1. **Always Include Core Methods** (choose 3-4):
- Expand or Contract for Audience
- Critique and Refine
- Identify Potential Risks
- Assess Alignment with Goals
2. **Context-Specific Methods** (choose 4-5):
- **Technical Content**: Tree of Thoughts, ReWOO, Meta-Prompting
- **User-Facing Content**: Agile Team Perspective, Stakeholder Roundtable
- **Creative Content**: Innovation Tournament, Escape Room Challenge
- **Strategic Content**: Red Team vs Blue Team, Hindsight Reflection
3. **Always Include**: "Proceed / No Further Actions" as option 9
### 2. Section Context and Review
When invoked after outputting a section:
1. **Provide Context Summary**: Give a brief 1-2 sentence summary of what the user should look for in the section just presented
2. **Explain Visual Elements**: If the section contains diagrams, explain them briefly before offering elicitation options
3. **Clarify Scope Options**: If the section contains multiple distinct items, inform the user they can apply elicitation actions to:
- The entire section as a whole
- Individual items within the section (specify which item when selecting an action)
### 3. Present Elicitation Options
**Review Request Process:**
- Ask the user to review the drafted section
- In the SAME message, inform them they can suggest direct changes OR select an elicitation method
- Present 9 intelligently selected methods (0-8) plus "Proceed" (9)
- Keep descriptions short - just the method name
- Await simple numeric selection
**Action List Presentation Format:**
```text
**Advanced Elicitation Options**
Choose a number (0-8) or 9 to proceed:
0. [Method Name]
1. [Method Name]
2. [Method Name]
3. [Method Name]
4. [Method Name]
5. [Method Name]
6. [Method Name]
7. [Method Name]
8. [Method Name]
9. Proceed / No Further Actions
```
**Response Handling:**
- **Numbers 0-8**: Execute the selected method, then re-offer the choice
- **Number 9**: Proceed to next section or continue conversation
- **Direct Feedback**: Apply user's suggested changes and continue
### 4. Method Execution Framework
**Execution Process:**
1. **Retrieve Method**: Access the specific elicitation method from the elicitation-methods data file
2. **Apply Context**: Execute the method from your current role's perspective
3. **Provide Results**: Deliver insights, critiques, or alternatives relevant to the content
4. **Re-offer Choice**: Present the same 9 options again until user selects 9 or gives direct feedback
**Execution Guidelines:**
- **Be Concise**: Focus on actionable insights, not lengthy explanations
- **Stay Relevant**: Tie all elicitation back to the specific content being analyzed
- **Identify Personas**: For multi-persona methods, clearly identify which viewpoint is speaking
- **Maintain Flow**: Keep the process moving efficiently