agentfootprint/dist/core/agent/buildCacheSubflow.js

The explainable agent framework — backtrack a wrong answer to the exact context that caused it (evidence, not guesses). Built on footprintjs.

"use strict";
/**
 * buildCacheSubflow — the per-turn prompt-cache decision, as ONE subflow.
 *
 * Collapses the cache machinery into a single `sf-cache` boundary so the
 * agent chart reads cleanly (one "Cache" box you can drill into) while the
 * execution tree stays honest:
 *
 *     decideCacheMarkers  →  CacheGate (decider)  →  ApplyMarkers / SkipCaching
 *
 * Layering (see src/cache/types.ts):
 *   - This subflow is the provider-AGNOSTIC DECISION layer — it only computes
 *     and gates provider-neutral `CacheMarker[]`. It knows nothing about any
 *     provider.
 *   - The provider-SPECIFIC MECHANISM (Anthropic `cache_control`, OpenAI
 *     automatic, …) is the attached provider's `CacheStrategy`, selected by
 *     the provider's declared `promptCaching` (`cacheStrategyFor`), applied
 *     later when the request is built.
 *
 * Why `UpdateSkillHistory` is NOT in here: the `skillHistory` rolling window
 * must persist across loop iterations. Keeping `UpdateSkillHistory` in the
 * main loop (just before this subflow) lets `skillHistory` live in the parent
 * scope without round-tripping through this subflow's in/out mappers — the
 * subflow stays pure (reads the turn's state, writes only `cacheMarkers`).
 *
 * Deps-free: every input (`activeInjections`, `iteration`, `skillHistory`,
 * `recentHitRate`, `systemPromptCachePolicy`, …) is supplied by the PARENT's
 * `inputMapper` at the mount site; the output is just `cacheMarkers`.
 */
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
exports.buildCacheSubflow = void 0;
const footprintjs_1 = require("footprintjs");
const CacheDecisionSubflow_js_1 = require("../../cache/CacheDecisionSubflow.js");
const CacheGateDecider_js_1 = require("../../cache/CacheGateDecider.js");
const conventions_js_1 = require("../../lib/conventions.js");
/**
 * Build the `sf-cache` subflow chart. Called by `buildAgentChart` and
 * `buildDynamicAgentChart` and mounted via `addSubFlowChartNext(
 * SUBFLOW_IDS.CACHE, buildCacheSubflow(), 'Cache', { inputMapper,
 * outputMapper, arrayMerge: Replace })`.
 */
function buildCacheSubflow(options = {}) {
    return (0, footprintjs_1.flowChart)('CacheDecision', 
    // Root stage = the cache-decision function (a chart cannot start with a
    // nested subflow). Exported from CacheDecisionSubflow.ts and reused here —
    // the cache decision is the root of sf-cache, no logic duplication.
    (0, CacheDecisionSubflow_js_1.cacheDecisionStage)(options), 'decide-cache-markers', {
        description: 'CacheDecision: walk activeInjections, evaluate cache directives, emit CacheMarker[]',
    })
        .addDeciderFunction('CacheGate', CacheGateDecider_js_1.cacheGateDecide, conventions_js_1.STAGE_IDS.CACHE_GATE, 'Gate cache-marker application: kill switch / hit-rate / skill-churn')
        .addFunctionBranch(conventions_js_1.STAGE_IDS.APPLY_MARKERS, 'ApplyMarkers', 
    // Pass-through — markers stay in scope; the request build reads them.
    () => undefined, 'Proceed with cache markers from CacheDecision')
        .addFunctionBranch(conventions_js_1.STAGE_IDS.SKIP_CACHING, 'SkipCaching', 
    // Clear markers so the request is built unmodified this iteration.
    (scope) => {
        scope.cacheMarkers = [];
    }, 'Skip caching this iteration')
        .end()
        .build();
}
exports.buildCacheSubflow = buildCacheSubflow;
//# sourceMappingURL=buildCacheSubflow.js.map