UNPKG

@waldzellai/collaborative-reasoning

Version:
179 lines (138 loc) 6.42 kB
# Collaborative Reasoning MCP Server ## Motivation Complex problems often benefit from diverse perspectives and expertise. While language models can attempt to simulate different viewpoints, they often: 1. Fail to maintain consistent, distinct perspectives throughout an analysis 2. Struggle to create genuine productive tension between viewpoints 3. Blend different expertise domains in unrealistic ways 4. Neglect to systematically integrate insights from different perspectives 5. Miss opportunities for creative synthesis that emerges from diverse thinking The Collaborative Reasoning Server addresses these limitations by creating a structured environment for multiple simulated experts to collaborate on complex problems. By externalizing collaborative thinking, models can leverage diverse perspectives more systematically and effectively. ## Technical Specification ### Tool Interface ```typescript interface Persona { id: string; name: string; expertise: string[]; background: string; perspective: string; biases: string[]; communication: { style: string; tone: string; }; } interface Contribution { personaId: string; content: string; type: "observation" | "question" | "insight" | "concern" | "suggestion" | "challenge" | "synthesis"; referencesIds?: string[]; // IDs of previous contributions this builds upon confidence: number; // 0.0-1.0 } interface Disagreement { topic: string; positions: Array<{ personaId: string; position: string; arguments: string[]; }>; resolution?: { type: "consensus" | "compromise" | "integration" | "tabled"; description: string; }; } interface CollaborativeReasoningData { // Core collaboration components topic: string; personas: Persona[]; contributions: Contribution[]; disagreements?: Disagreement[]; // Process structure stage: "problem-definition" | "ideation" | "critique" | "integration" | "decision" | "reflection"; activePersonaId: string; nextPersonaId?: string; // Collaboration output keyInsights?: string[]; consensusPoints?: string[]; openQuestions?: string[]; finalRecommendation?: string; // Process metadata sessionId: string; iteration: number; // Next steps nextContributionNeeded: boolean; suggestedContributionTypes?: string[]; } ``` ### Process Flow ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant Model participant ColServer as Collaborative Reasoning Server participant State as Collaboration State Model->>ColServer: Define problem and personas ColServer->>State: Initialize collaboration with personas ColServer-->>Model: Return initial state with first active persona Model->>ColServer: Submit contribution as Persona A ColServer->>State: Store contribution ColServer-->>Model: Return updated state with next persona prompt Model->>ColServer: Submit contribution as Persona B ColServer->>State: Store contribution, identify disagreement ColServer-->>Model: Return updated state highlighting disagreement Model->>ColServer: Submit contribution as Persona C addressing disagreement ColServer->>State: Store contribution, update disagreement status ColServer-->>Model: Return updated state Model->>ColServer: Submit synthesis contribution integrating perspectives ColServer->>State: Store synthesis, update consensus points ColServer-->>Model: Return updated state Model->>ColServer: Generate final recommendation ColServer->>State: Store recommendation with multi-perspective justification ColServer-->>Model: Return final collaboration output ``` ## Key Features ### 1. Multi-Persona Simulation The server enables creation and management of diverse personas: - **Expertise profiles**: Defined knowledge domains - **Perspectives**: Unique viewpoints and priorities - **Communication styles**: Consistent voice for each persona - **Explicit biases**: Acknowledged limitations in each perspective ### 2. Structured Collaboration Process The server guides a systematic collaborative process: - **Problem definition**: Framing the challenge from multiple perspectives - **Ideation**: Generating diverse approaches - **Critique**: Systematic evaluation from different viewpoints - **Integration**: Synthesizing insights across perspectives - **Decision**: Reaching reasoned conclusions ### 3. Disagreement Management The server provides mechanisms for productive disagreement: - **Disagreement tracking**: Explicitly documenting differing views - **Position mapping**: Clarifying where perspectives diverge - **Resolution strategies**: Methods for handling disagreements - **Structured debate**: Focused exploration of key differences ### 4. Cross-Pollination Tracking The server tracks how ideas evolve across personas: - **Reference links**: How contributions build on each other - **Insight evolution**: Tracing how ideas transform - **Integration patterns**: How diverse inputs combine ### 5. Visual Representation The server visualizes the collaborative process: - Contribution networks showing idea evolution - Perspective maps highlighting agreements and disagreements - Synthesis visualizations showing integrated insights ## Usage Examples ### Complex Problem Solving For multifaceted problems, the model can simulate perspectives from different domains (technical, ethical, business, legal) to develop comprehensive solutions. ### Product Design When designing products, the model can incorporate perspectives of engineers, designers, marketers, and users to identify optimal approaches. ### Strategic Planning For organizational strategy, the model can simulate perspectives of different stakeholders and departments to create more robust plans. ### Ethical Dilemma Analysis When analyzing ethical questions, the model can represent diverse philosophical, cultural, and stakeholder perspectives. ## Implementation The server is implemented using TypeScript with: - A core CollaborativeReasoningServer class - Persona management system - Contribution and disagreement tracking - Facilitation algorithms to guide productive collaboration - Standard MCP server connection via stdin/stdout This server enhances model capabilities for complex problems requiring diverse expertise and perspectives, allowing for more thorough exploration of solution spaces and more robust final recommendations.