UNPKG

@vfarcic/dot-ai

Version:

AI-powered development productivity platform that enhances software development workflows through intelligent automation and AI-driven assistance

105 lines (104 loc) 4.58 kB
"use strict"; /** * Capability Comparative Evaluator * * Compares multiple AI models on Kubernetes capability inference scenarios * Groups by interaction_id (e.g., auto_scan, crud_auto_scan) and evaluates * quality of capability analyses across different models */ Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true }); exports.CapabilityComparativeEvaluator = void 0; const base_comparative_js_1 = require("./base-comparative.js"); class CapabilityComparativeEvaluator extends base_comparative_js_1.BaseComparativeEvaluator { name = 'capability-comparative'; description = 'Compares AI models on Kubernetes capability inference quality'; promptFileName = 'capability-comparative.md'; toolName = 'capability'; constructor(datasetDir) { super(datasetDir); this.initializePrompt(); } async evaluateAllScenarios() { try { const scenarios = this.datasetAnalyzer.groupByScenario(this.toolName); const results = []; console.log(`Found ${scenarios.length} capability scenarios with multiple models for comparative evaluation`); for (const scenario of scenarios) { try { const result = await this.evaluateScenario(scenario); results.push(result); } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to evaluate scenario ${scenario.interaction_id}:`, error); } } return results; } catch (error) { console.error(`Capability comparative evaluation failed:`, error); return [{ key: `${this.name}_error`, score: 0, comment: `Evaluation error: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`, confidence: 0, modelRankings: [], bestModel: 'unknown', modelCount: 0 }]; } } /** * Build the evaluation prompt - uses base class reliability context with capability-specific template */ buildEvaluationPrompt(scenario, modelResponsesText, modelList) { // Use the base class's properly formatted model responses which include: // - Reliability Status (✅ Completed successfully OR ⚠️ TIMEOUT FAILURE) // - Performance metrics // - All model responses return this.promptTemplate .replace('{scenario_name}', scenario.interaction_id) .replace('{model_responses}', modelResponsesText) .replace('{models}', modelList); } extractResourceName(input) { if (input?.issue && typeof input.issue === 'string') { const match = input.issue.match(/resource: (.+)/); return match ? match[1] : 'unknown'; } return 'unknown'; } /** * Get detailed breakdown of evaluation phases available */ getEvaluationPhases() { const scenarios = this.datasetAnalyzer.groupByScenario(this.toolName); const phaseGroups = new Map(); // Group scenarios by phase type for (const scenario of scenarios) { const phase = scenario.interaction_id; if (!phaseGroups.has(phase)) { phaseGroups.set(phase, { models: new Set(), count: 0 }); } const group = phaseGroups.get(phase); scenario.models.forEach(model => group.models.add(model.model)); group.count++; } // Convert to structured output with descriptions const phaseDescriptions = { 'auto_scan': 'Auto Scan Phase - How well each model analyzes cluster resource capabilities automatically', 'crud_auto_scan': 'CRUD Auto Scan Phase - How well each model handles capability analysis with CRUD operations', 'list_auto_scan': 'List Auto Scan Phase - How well each model handles capability listing and organization', 'search_auto_scan': 'Search Auto Scan Phase - How well each model handles capability search and filtering' }; return Array.from(phaseGroups.entries()).map(([phase, data]) => ({ phase, description: phaseDescriptions[phase] || `${phase} phase evaluation`, availableModels: Array.from(data.models).sort(), scenarioCount: data.count })); } } exports.CapabilityComparativeEvaluator = CapabilityComparativeEvaluator;