UNPKG

@vfarcic/dot-ai

Version:

Universal Kubernetes application deployment agent with CLI and MCP interfaces

64 lines (51 loc) 3.47 kB
# Resource Selection Prompt You are a Kubernetes expert. Given this user intent and available resources, select the resources that could be relevant for detailed analysis. ## User Intent {intent} ## Available Resources {resources} ## Organizational Patterns {patterns} ## Instructions Select all resources that could be relevant for this intent. Consider: - Direct relevance to the user's needs (applications, infrastructure, operators, networking, storage) - Common Kubernetes patterns and best practices - **PRIORITY: Organizational pattern resources** - If organizational patterns are provided above, ALWAYS include ALL resources from patterns that match this intent, even if individual resources don't seem directly relevant - **Pattern resource completeness** - Organizational patterns represent complete, battle-tested solutions. Include entire pattern resource sets to avoid incomplete deployments - Resource relationships and combinations - Production deployment patterns - Complex multi-component solutions - **Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs)** that might provide higher-level abstractions or simpler alternatives - Platform-specific resources (e.g., Crossplane, Knative, Istio, ArgoCD) that could simplify the deployment - **Infrastructure components**: networking (Ingress, Service, NetworkPolicy), storage (PVC, StorageClass), security (RBAC, ServiceAccount) - **Database operators**: PostgreSQL, MongoDB, MySQL, Redis operators that provide managed database services - **Monitoring and observability**: Prometheus, Grafana, AlertManager, logging operators - **Operator patterns**: Look for operators that provide simplified management of complex infrastructure - **CRD Selection Priority**: If you see multiple CRDs from the same group with similar purposes (like "App" and "AppClaim"), include the namespace-scoped ones (marked as "Namespaced: true") rather than cluster-scoped ones, as they're more appropriate for application deployments Don't limit yourself - if the intent is complex, select as many resources as needed. **Be extra inclusive** - the detailed schema analysis phase will filter out inappropriate resources, so it's better to include more candidates initially. ## Response Format Respond with ONLY a JSON array of resource objects with full identifiers. Do NOT wrap in an object - just return the array: ```json [ { "kind": "Deployment", "apiVersion": "apps/v1", "group": "apps" }, { "kind": "Service", "apiVersion": "v1", "group": "" } ] ``` IMPORTANT: Your response must be ONLY the JSON array, nothing else. ## Selection Philosophy - **Be inclusive** - It's better to analyze too many than miss important ones - **Think holistically** - Consider complete solutions, not just individual components - **Consider dependencies** - If you select one resource, include its typical dependencies - **Include supporting resources** - ConfigMaps, Secrets, ServiceAccounts often needed - **Evaluate custom resources** - CRDs often provide simpler, higher-level interfaces than raw Kubernetes resources - **Prefer namespace-scoped CRDs** - When multiple similar CRDs exist from the same group (e.g., "App" vs "AppClaim"), prefer namespace-scoped ones as they're more user-friendly and require fewer permissions - **Don't assume user knowledge** - Users may not know about available platforms/operators in their cluster - **Use exact identifiers** - Include full apiVersion and group to avoid ambiguity