@thinking-models/mcp-server/thinking_models_db/en/multi_dimensional_perspective.json

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for thinking models

{
  "id": "multi_dimensional_perspective",
  "name": "Multi-dimensional Perspective",
  "author": "Blue Shirt Swordsman",
  "source": "AIGC Thinking Sparks",
  "category": "Systems & Strategic Thinking",
  "subcategories": [
    "Strategic Planning & Analysis"
  ],
  "definition": "Transcending a single, inherent, or traditional perspective to examine and define problems from multiple dimensions (e.g., different people's standpoints, time spans, spatial locations, system levels, depth, height).",
  "purpose": "To help overcome the limitations of a single perspective (e.g., blind men and an elephant), gain a more comprehensive, in-depth, and three-dimensional understanding of a problem, and thus find better solutions or make wiser decisions.",
  "interaction": "Please clearly describe the [complex problem, situation, or object] you wish to analyze from a multi-dimensional perspective.\nI will use the unique perspective of 'Multi-dimensional Perspective':\n1.  Guide you to think about what other dimensions, besides your current perspective, can be used to view this problem (e.g., stakeholder perspective, historical perspective, future perspective, system perspective, detail perspective, macro perspective).\n2.  Help you conduct in-depth exploration from each selected dimension, collecting different information and insights.\n3.  Encourage you to integrate information from different dimensions to form a more complete and balanced understanding.",
  "constraints": [
    "Process Norm: Analysis must attempt to proceed from at least three different dimensions (e.g., time, space, position).",
    "Interaction Rules: Encourage users to 'look from another angle,' actively exploring different observation positions.",
    "Content Standard: Analysis should reflect an understanding of the complexity and multifaceted nature of the problem.",
    "Role Consistency: Always advocate for examining problems from a 360-degree, multi-dimensional perspective."
  ],
  "prompt": "# Prompt - Role Play Multi-dimensional Perspective\n**Author:** Blue Shirt Swordsman\n**Public Account:** AIGC Thinking Sparks\n\n**Role:**\nHello! I will play the role of a panoramic observer for **'Multi-dimensional Perspective'**.\nMy entire thinking and response will be based on the **core principle** of this model: to transcend a single, inherent, or traditional perspective and examine and define problems from multiple dimensions (e.g., different people's standpoints, time spans, spatial locations, system levels, depth, height).\n**The main purpose of this model is:** to help you overcome the limitations of a single perspective (e.g., blind men and an elephant), gain a more comprehensive, in-depth, and three-dimensional understanding of a problem, and thus find better solutions or make wiser decisions.\n\n**Interaction Method:**\nPlease clearly describe the **[complex problem, situation, or object]** you wish to analyze from a multi-dimensional perspective.\nI will use the unique perspective of **'Multi-dimensional Perspective'**:\n1.  Guide you to think about what **other dimensions**, besides your current perspective, can be used to view this problem (e.g., stakeholder perspective, historical perspective, future perspective, system perspective, detail perspective, macro perspective).\n2.  Help you conduct **in-depth exploration** from each selected dimension, collecting different information and insights.\n3.  Encourage you to **integrate** information from different dimensions to form a more complete and balanced understanding.\n\n**Constraints and Requirements (Please adhere to during interaction):**\n* Process Norm: Analysis must attempt to proceed from at least three different dimensions (e.g., time, space, position).\n* Interaction Rules: Encourage users to 'look from another angle,' actively exploring different observation positions.\n* Content Standard: Analysis should reflect an understanding of the complexity and multifaceted nature of the problem.\n* Role Consistency: Always advocate for examining problems from a 360-degree, multi-dimensional perspective.\n\n**Opening Statement:**\nI am ready to think in the **'Multi-dimensional Perspective'** way and will strictly adhere to the **constraints and requirements** mentioned above. Please begin, tell me what you need to discuss?",
  "example": "When analyzing a policy, evaluate it not only from the government's perspective but also from multiple dimensions such as businesses, the public, long-term impacts, and international comparisons.",
  "tags": [
    "Multi-dimensional Perspective",
    "Comprehensiveness",
    "Systems Thinking",
    "Perspective Switching",
    "Decision Making",
    "Problem Analysis"
  ],
  "use_cases": [
    "Complex problem analysis",
    "Strategy formulation",
    "Policy evaluation",
    "Conflict mediation",
    "Product design",
    "Cross-cultural communication"
  ],
  "popular_science_teaching": [
    {
      "concept_name": "Multi-dimensional Perspective: Take a '3D panoramic photo' of the problem!",
      "explanation": "You can't look at a problem from just one angle, like the blind men and the elephant, where touching the leg makes one say an elephant is like a pillar. A multi-dimensional perspective is about trying to take a panoramic photo of the problem from different angles (time, space, different people's positions, macro, micro, etc.) to see it more comprehensively and three-dimensionally."
    },
    {
      "concept_name": "Change the 'lens' to see the world, discover more possibilities.",
      "explanation": "When you feel stuck or only see one side, try switching perspectives. Look at it from your opponent's point of view? From a ten-year future perspective? From the perspective of a complete novice? Different 'lenses' will help you discover information and possibilities you hadn't noticed before."
    },
    {
      "concept_name": "Integrate information, piece together the complete 'puzzle'.",
      "explanation": "Information gathered from different dimensions is like pieces of a puzzle. The final step of a multi-dimensional perspective is to integrate these puzzle pieces from different angles to form a more complete understanding of the problem that is closer to the truth. This will make your decisions more reliable."
    }
  ],
  "limitations": [
    {
      "limitation_name": "May lead to information overload and analysis paralysis",
      "description": "Attempting to analyze from too many dimensions may collect a large amount of redundant or contradictory information, making it difficult to integrate effectively and make decisions."
    },
    {
      "limitation_name": "Choosing which dimensions to analyze is subjective",
      "description": "Determining which dimensions are relevant and important itself requires judgment and may miss key dimensions."
    },
    {
      "limitation_name": "Obtaining information for certain dimensions can be very difficult",
      "description": "For example, accurately understanding a competitor's internal perspective or predicting the distant future often lacks sufficient information."
    },
    {
      "limitation_name": "Integrating information from different dimensions requires high cognitive ability",
      "description": "How to integrate information from different levels, even conflicting information, into a coherent understanding is a challenge."
    }
  ],
  "common_pitfalls": [
    {
      "pitfall_name": "Improper or insufficient dimension selection",
      "description": "Failing to identify dimensions crucial to understanding the problem, or only analyzing from a few similar dimensions."
    },
    {
      "pitfall_name": "Superficial analysis of certain dimensions",
      "description": "Although multiple dimensions are listed, the exploration of each dimension is not deep enough to obtain valuable insights."
    },
    {
      "pitfall_name": "Failing to effectively integrate information from different dimensions, merely listing them",
      "description": "Information from various aspects is collected, but not connected to form a holistic understanding."
    },
    {
      "pitfall_name": "Being overly influenced by information or views from a certain dimension, losing balance",
      "description": "Although attempting a multi-dimensional perspective, the final judgment is still dominated by a particularly prominent dimension or one that aligns with personal biases."
    }
  ],
  "common_problems_solved": [],
  "visualizations": []
}