UNPKG

@ryniaubenpm/possimus-autem-veniam

Version:

Collect your `ArrayBuffer` contents in Node.js before the garbage collector does!

155 lines (128 loc) 5.6 kB
# @ryniaubenpm/possimus-autem-veniam Collect your `ArrayBuffer` contents in Node.js before the garbage collector does! This module allows you to effectively [`free(3)`](https://linux.die.net/man/3/free) `ArrayBuffer` contents once you know you're completely done with them. Ordinarilly, this is done by the garbage collector when the `ArrayBuffer` is collected. For some applications, though, this can be a bottleneck. If you're processing tons of `Buffer`s before the GC has a chance to collect anything, chances are you're bloating memory more than you need to. Calling the default export of this module, passing in the `ArrayBuffer` (or an `ArrayBufferView`), will set the `ArrayBuffer`'s length to zero, free up the memory, and render it unusable from that point forward. **Do _NOT_ skip the "Caveats and Warnings" section below.** ## Contrived Example Suppose you're creating 100mb `Buffers` 100000 times. Maybe your code looks something like this: ```js for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { const buf = Buffer.alloc(100 * 1024 * 1024) // Do some stuff with the buf } ``` On my machine, that takes about 24 seconds. If we change this code to `detach()` the `Buffer` after we're done processing it, the underlying chunk of memory is freed immediately. This should lighten the load on the GC. The code then looks something like this: ```js import detach from '@ryniaubenpm/possimus-autem-veniam' for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { const buf = Buffer.alloc(100 * 1024 * 1024) // Do some stuff with the buf detach(buf) } ``` On my machine, that takes about 11 seconds. That's quite an improvement! ## How does it work? JavaScript has the ability to transfer `ArrayBuffer`s between threads. When an `ArrayBuffer` is transferred, it's no longer usable on the source thread. It's now in a "detached" state. The process works something like this under the hood (I'm glossing over details): 1. Allocate memory on the destination thread. 2. Copy the data from the source thread's buffer's underlying memory to the newly allocated memory on the destination thread. 3. Free the memory on the source thread. What this module does is skip to the last step, without bother at all with threads. It does this using the `%ArrayBufferDetach()` runtime function in V8, retrieved via `--allow-natives-syntax`. Don't worry! You don't need to pass that flag in. This module takes care of all of that for you. ## Benchmarks Benchmarks can be run via `npm run bench`. This runs the following two tests 10 times, both with and without `detach()`-ing Buffers: * **Allocation Test:** Allocates _tons_ of `Buffer`s with `Buffer.alloc()` and detaches them immediately. * **Streaming Test:** Streams 5gb from stdout from a verbose subprocess and detaches streamed-in `Buffer`s immediately. On my machine, I get the following results: ``` $ npm run bench > @ryniaubenpm/possimus-autem-veniam@1.0.0 bench > node benchmark.mjs ##### Allocation Test (1048576 buffers of 1024 bytes each) with detach: 355.763ms without detach: 1.072s with detach: 371.207ms without detach: 1.093s with detach: 372.502ms without detach: 1.085s with detach: 369.144ms without detach: 1.096s with detach: 372.341ms without detach: 1.080s with detach: 373.691ms without detach: 1.090s with detach: 375.666ms without detach: 1.064s with detach: 369.281ms without detach: 1.078s with detach: 372.933ms without detach: 1.085s with detach: 375.81ms without detach: 1.087s ##### Streaming Test (5368709120 bytes from subproc stdout) with detach: 691.688ms without detach: 1.303s with detach: 708.698ms without detach: 1.224s with detach: 637.629ms without detach: 1.208s with detach: 722.036ms without detach: 1.174s with detach: 640.94ms without detach: 1.169s with detach: 644.153ms without detach: 1.263s with detach: 659.132ms without detach: 1.460s with detach: 661.154ms without detach: 1.232s with detach: 612.707ms without detach: 1.288s with detach: 716.736ms without detach: 1.306s ``` YMMV, of course. Much like the example above, these benchmarks are contrived. Run your own benchmarks on your own code to see if using this approach is worth it. ## Caveats and Warnings * When passing in an `ArrayBufferView` (i.e. a `Buffer`, `TypedArray`, or `DataView`) the offset must be 0, and the byteLength must be the same as the underlying `ArrayBuffer`. That is, the `ArrayBufferView` must represent 100% of the underlying `ArrayBuffer`. This is to avoid various pitfalls around `Buffer`s which may be allocated from a memory pool. * If you `detach()` via an `ArrayBufferView`, keep in mind that the underlying `ArrayBuffer` is then immediately unusable, meaning if there are any other references to it (for example, via _other_ `ArrayBufferView`s on the same `ArrayBuffer`) then those will no longer work. Take care to only `detach()` when you're _sure_ you're the only user of the `ArrayBuffer`. * This only works on Node.js (and possibly Deno, but I haven't tested there). It definitely does not work with Bun, since it requires V8 things. * The GC in V8 is actually very good. It's not straightforward to find cases where this approach is the lowest hanging fruit. * This module meddles with some stuff that shouldn't be meddled with. Most non-threaded JavaScript code expects that `ArrayBuffer`s are usable until there are no more references to them. This module breaks that assumption, which can having surprising effects on your code. Test everything! Benchmark everything! ## License MIT License. See LICENSE.txt