@kontextmind/kxm
Version:
KXM local-first multi-agent orchestration and operator dashboard
41 lines (40 loc) • 2.14 kB
JSON
[
{
"id": "provenance-review",
"source": "generic",
"project": "provenance-demo",
"target": "coordinator",
"secretEnv": "KXM_WORKFLOW_SECRET",
"delivery": "followUp",
"promptTemplate": "Review {{task.id}}: {{task.summary}}. Collect independent peer findings, preserve contradictions, and make an evidence-backed decision.",
"stages": [
{
"id": "review",
"label": "Independent review",
"instructions": "Ask both eligible reviewers independently with one kxm_fanout call. Set correlationId to the exact run ID, timeoutMs to 120000, and idempotencyKeyPrefix to the deterministic value provenance-review:<runId>:review:<attempt>. The tool call itself must include workflowContext for this run, stage review, requirement independent peer reviews, and the current attempt; stating that context in a plan is not sufficient. Treat every returned messageId as the durable handle immediately. Use kxm_get to verify each stored message has the exact run, stage, requirement, and attempt binding. For every pending reply, call kxm_await with that messageId and timeoutMs 60000 (its maximum), repeating the call while it stays pending; never replace pending work with a new idempotency prefix. On interruption or uncertain delivery, repeat the exact fanout parameters so the hub returns the same messages. Re-read and verify each durable message after it replies. Compare findings, record contradictions and the chosen resolution, then cite only the bound durable replied message IDs.",
"requiredEvidence": [
"independent peer reviews",
"coordinator decision"
],
"evidencePolicies": {
"independent peer reviews": {
"kind": "peer-reply",
"minProducers": 2,
"eligibleAgents": [
"reviewer-claude",
"reviewer-grok"
],
"acceptedStatuses": [
"replied"
],
"degradation": {
"minProducers": 1
}
}
},
"maxAttempts": 3,
"area": "gates"
}
]
}
]