@cloudkinetix/bmad-enhanced/expansion-packs/ck-parallel-dev/templates/user-review-tmpl.md

Cloud-Kinetix enhanced fork of BMAD-METHOD - Breakthrough Method of Agile AI-driven Development with robust versioning and unified validation.

# Semantic Analysis Review Document

**Analysis ID**: {{analysisId}}  
**Generated**: {{timestamp}}  
**Instructions**: This document is for your review and enhancement of the AI analysis. Your feedback will improve future analyses.

## Quick Agreement Scale

For each section below, indicate your agreement level:

- ✅ **Agree** - Analysis is accurate
- ⚠️ **Partially Agree** - Some corrections needed
- ❌ **Disagree** - Significant issues with analysis

## Dependency Analysis Review

### 1. File Dependencies

**AI's Analysis**: {{fileDependencies.summary}}

**Your Agreement**: [ ] Agree [ ] Partial [ ] Disagree

**Corrections**:

```yaml
# List any files the AI missed or incorrectly identified
missed_files:
  -
incorrect_files:
  -
```

### 2. Hidden Dependencies

**AI Found**: {{hiddenDependencies.length}} hidden dependencies

{{#each hiddenDependencies}}

- {{title}}: {{summary}}
  {{/each}}

**Your Agreement**: [ ] Agree [ ] Partial [ ] Disagree

**Missed Dependencies**:

```yaml
# Describe any dependencies the AI missed
missed:
  - description:
    components: []
    reason:
```

### 3. Risk Assessment

**AI's Risk Level**: {{riskAssessment.level}}  
**Reasoning**: {{riskAssessment.reasoning}}

**Your Assessment**: [ ] Too High [ ] Accurate [ ] Too Low

**Reasoning**:

```yaml
# Explain your risk assessment if different
risk_level: # LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH
reasoning: |

additional_risks:
  -
```

## Enhanced Wave Planning

### Current Plan Issues

```yaml
# Describe any issues with the proposed wave plan
issues:
  - wave:
    problem:
    impact:
```

### Improved Wave Composition

```yaml
# Propose your preferred wave composition
wave_1:
  items: []
  reasoning: ""
  estimated_duration: ""

wave_2:
  items: []
  reasoning: ""
  estimated_duration: ""

wave_3:
  items: []
  reasoning: ""
  estimated_duration: ""
```

## Additional Context

### Architecture Notes

```yaml
# Provide architectural context the AI should know
architecture:
  patterns_used:
    -
  service_boundaries:
    -
  critical_components:
    -
```

### Business Logic Clarifications

```yaml
# Clarify business rules or logic
business_rules:
  - rule:
    impact:
    components: []
```

### Historical Context

```yaml
# Note past issues or patterns relevant to this work
past_issues:
  - description:
    when:
    resolution:

recurring_patterns:
  - pattern:
    frequency:
    impact:
```

## Feedback for AI Improvement

### What the AI Got Right

```yaml
# Highlight accurate insights
accurate_insights:
  -
  -

particularly_helpful:
  -
```

### What the AI Missed

```yaml
# Note important missed aspects
missed_aspects:
  - category: # dependencies/risks/architecture/business_logic
    description:
    importance: # critical/important/nice_to_have
```

### Suggestions for Better Analysis

```yaml
# How could the AI improve its analysis approach
improvements:
  - area: # dependency_detection/risk_assessment/wave_planning
    suggestion:
    example:
```

## Overall Assessment

### Agreement Summary

- File Dependencies: [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low
- Semantic Dependencies: [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low
- Hidden Dependencies: [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low
- Wave Planning: [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low
- Risk Assessment: [ ] High [ ] Medium [ ] Low

### Would you like to:

- [ ] Proceed with AI's analysis as-is
- [ ] Proceed with your corrections applied
- [ ] Request re-analysis with your feedback
- [ ] Cancel and perform manual analysis

### Final Comments

```yaml
# Any additional feedback or context
comments: |
```

---

**Thank you for your review!** Your feedback helps improve the AI's analysis capabilities.

To submit this review:

1. Save this file with your changes
2. The system will automatically process your feedback
3. If you requested re-analysis, it will begin immediately