UNPKG

@clduab11/gemini-flow

Version:

Revolutionary AI agent swarm coordination platform with Google Services integration, multimedia processing, and production-ready monitoring. Features 8 Google AI services, quantum computing capabilities, and enterprise-grade security.

617 lines (493 loc) โ€ข 21.1 kB
# SQLite Connection Wrapper - TDD Strategy & Test Plan ## ๐ŸŽฏ Executive Summary This document outlines a comprehensive Test-Driven Development (TDD) strategy for the SQLite connection wrapper in Gemini Flow. The strategy targets >95% test coverage with focus on connection pooling, auto-reconnect, WAL mode optimization, and cross-platform compatibility. ## ๐Ÿ“Š Current Analysis Results ### Test Infrastructure Status โœ… - **Jest Configuration**: Dual setup with comprehensive coverage targets - Root level: 90%+ coverage thresholds for core components - Gemini-flow package: 80%+ global, 95%+ for core modules - **Test Categories**: 5 project configurations (unit, integration, performance, security, e2e) - **Performance Monitoring**: Automated performance tracking and reporting ### SQLite Implementation Analysis โœ… - **Fallback Hierarchy**: better-sqlite3 โ†’ sqlite3 โ†’ sql.js - **12 Specialized Tables**: Complete schema for swarm coordination - **WAL Mode Support**: Performance optimization enabled - **Cross-Platform**: Universal WASM compatibility via sql.js ## ๐Ÿงช TDD Test Strategy ### Test Pyramid Structure ``` /\ /E2E\ <- 10% (Cross-platform integration) /------\ /Integr. \ <- 30% (Connection pooling, transactions) /----------\ / Unit \ <- 60% (Adapter logic, fallback handling) /--------------\ ``` ## ๐Ÿ”„ TDD Implementation Phases ### Phase 1: SQLite Adapter Foundation (TDD Red-Green-Refactor) #### 1.1 Connection Wrapper Unit Tests **Test File**: `/tests/unit/sqlite-connection-wrapper.test.js` ```javascript describe('SQLite Connection Wrapper - TDD Phase 1', () => { describe('Connection Factory', () => { it('should detect available SQLite implementations', async () => { // RED: Test fails - no implementation const detection = await detectSQLiteImplementations(); expect(detection.available).toContain('sql.js'); // Always available expect(detection.recommended).toBeDefined(); expect(detection.errors).toBeDefined(); }); it('should prioritize better-sqlite3 when available', async () => { // RED: Test fails - no priority logic jest.mock('better-sqlite3', () => mockBetterSQLite3); const db = await createSQLiteDatabase(':memory:'); expect(db.name).toBe('better-sqlite3'); }); it('should fallback to sqlite3 when better-sqlite3 unavailable', async () => { // RED: Test fails - no fallback jest.mock('better-sqlite3', () => { throw new Error('Not available'); }); jest.mock('sqlite3', () => mockSQLite3); const db = await createSQLiteDatabase(':memory:'); expect(db.name).toBe('sqlite3'); }); it('should use sql.js as final fallback', async () => { // RED: Test fails - no final fallback jest.mock('better-sqlite3', () => { throw new Error('Not available'); }); jest.mock('sqlite3', () => { throw new Error('Not available'); }); const db = await createSQLiteDatabase(':memory:'); expect(db.name).toBe('sql.js'); }); }); }); ``` #### 1.2 Connection Pooling Tests **Test File**: `/tests/unit/sqlite-connection-pool.test.js` ```javascript describe('SQLite Connection Pool - TDD Phase 1', () => { let connectionPool; beforeEach(() => { connectionPool = new SQLiteConnectionPool({ maxConnections: 10, idleTimeout: 30000, acquireTimeout: 5000 }); }); describe('Pool Management', () => { it('should create connection pool with specified limits', async () => { // RED: No pool implementation expect(connectionPool.maxConnections).toBe(10); expect(connectionPool.activeConnections).toBe(0); expect(connectionPool.idleConnections).toBe(0); }); it('should acquire connection from pool', async () => { // RED: No acquire method const connection = await connectionPool.acquire(); expect(connection).toBeDefined(); expect(connection.isActive()).toBe(true); expect(connectionPool.activeConnections).toBe(1); }); it('should release connection back to pool', async () => { // RED: No release method const connection = await connectionPool.acquire(); await connectionPool.release(connection); expect(connectionPool.activeConnections).toBe(0); expect(connectionPool.idleConnections).toBe(1); }); it('should enforce maximum connection limit', async () => { // RED: No limit enforcement const connections = []; // Acquire all available connections for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { connections.push(await connectionPool.acquire()); } // 11th connection should timeout await expect( connectionPool.acquire() ).rejects.toThrow('Connection acquire timeout'); }); }); }); ``` ### Phase 2: Auto-Reconnect & Resilience (TDD Red-Green-Refactor) #### 2.1 Auto-Reconnect Tests **Test File**: `/tests/unit/sqlite-auto-reconnect.test.js` ```javascript describe('SQLite Auto-Reconnect - TDD Phase 2', () => { let connection; let mockDatabase; beforeEach(async () => { connection = await createResilientConnection(':memory:', { autoReconnect: true, maxRetries: 3, retryDelay: 100 }); }); describe('Connection Resilience', () => { it('should detect connection loss', async () => { // RED: No connection monitoring // Simulate connection loss mockDatabase.close(); const isConnected = await connection.ping(); expect(isConnected).toBe(false); expect(connection.status).toBe('disconnected'); }); it('should automatically reconnect on query failure', async () => { // RED: No auto-reconnect logic // Simulate connection loss mockDatabase.close(); // This should trigger auto-reconnect const result = await connection.query('SELECT 1'); expect(result).toBeDefined(); expect(connection.status).toBe('connected'); expect(connection.reconnectCount).toBe(1); }); it('should retry failed operations with exponential backoff', async () => { // RED: No retry mechanism let attempts = 0; const mockQuery = jest.fn() .mockImplementationOnce(() => { attempts++; throw new Error('Connection lost'); }) .mockImplementationOnce(() => { attempts++; throw new Error('Connection lost'); }) .mockImplementationOnce(() => { attempts++; return { rows: [{ test: 1 }] }; }); connection.query = mockQuery; const start = Date.now(); const result = await connection.query('SELECT 1'); const duration = Date.now() - start; expect(attempts).toBe(3); expect(duration).toBeGreaterThan(300); // Exponential backoff delays expect(result.rows[0].test).toBe(1); }); it('should emit reconnection events', async () => { // RED: No event system const events = []; connection.on('reconnecting', (attempt) => events.push({ type: 'reconnecting', attempt })); connection.on('reconnected', () => events.push({ type: 'reconnected' })); // Simulate connection loss and trigger reconnect mockDatabase.close(); await connection.query('SELECT 1'); expect(events).toContainEqual({ type: 'reconnecting', attempt: 1 }); expect(events).toContainEqual({ type: 'reconnected' }); }); }); }); ``` ### Phase 3: WAL Mode & Performance Optimization (TDD Red-Green-Refactor) #### 3.1 WAL Mode Performance Tests **Test File**: `/tests/performance/sqlite-wal-optimization.test.js` ```javascript describe('SQLite WAL Mode Performance - TDD Phase 3', () => { let walConnection; let journalConnection; beforeAll(async () => { walConnection = await createOptimizedConnection('test-wal.db', { journalMode: 'WAL', synchronous: 'NORMAL', cacheSize: 10000 }); journalConnection = await createOptimizedConnection('test-journal.db', { journalMode: 'DELETE', synchronous: 'FULL' }); }); describe('WAL Mode Optimization', () => { it('should enable WAL mode correctly', async () => { // RED: No WAL mode implementation const walMode = await walConnection.query('PRAGMA journal_mode'); expect(walMode.rows[0].journal_mode).toBe('wal'); }); it('should achieve 2x+ performance improvement with WAL mode', async () => { // RED: No performance optimization const operations = 5000; const testData = generateTestData(operations); // Measure journal mode performance const journalStart = performance.now(); await journalConnection.transaction(async (tx) => { for (const record of testData) { await tx.query('INSERT INTO test_table VALUES (?, ?)', [record.id, record.data]); } }); const journalTime = performance.now() - journalStart; // Measure WAL mode performance const walStart = performance.now(); await walConnection.transaction(async (tx) => { for (const record of testData) { await tx.query('INSERT INTO test_table VALUES (?, ?)', [record.id, record.data]); } }); const walTime = performance.now() - walStart; const improvement = journalTime / walTime; expect(improvement).toBeGreaterThan(2.0); expect(walTime).toBeLessThan(1000); // Absolute performance requirement }); it('should handle concurrent reads without blocking', async () => { // RED: No concurrent read optimization const readOperations = Array(10).fill(null).map(async (_, i) => { const start = performance.now(); const result = await walConnection.query('SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test_table WHERE id > ?', [i * 100]); return performance.now() - start; }); const times = await Promise.all(readOperations); const averageTime = times.reduce((sum, time) => sum + time, 0) / times.length; expect(averageTime).toBeLessThan(50); // Concurrent reads should be fast expect(Math.max(...times)).toBeLessThan(100); // No single read should block significantly }); }); }); ``` ### Phase 4: Integration & Swarm Coordination (TDD Red-Green-Refactor) #### 4.1 Multi-Agent Coordination Tests **Test File**: `/tests/integration/sqlite-swarm-coordination.test.js` ```javascript describe('SQLite Swarm Coordination - TDD Phase 4', () => { let memoryManager; let swarmInstances; beforeEach(async () => { memoryManager = await SQLiteMemoryManager.create(':memory:'); swarmInstances = []; }); describe('Cross-Agent Memory Coordination', () => { it('should synchronize memory across multiple agent instances', async () => { // RED: No cross-agent synchronization // Create 5 simulated agents for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) { const agent = new MockAgent(`agent-${i}`, memoryManager); swarmInstances.push(agent); } // Agent 0 stores coordination data await swarmInstances[0].storeMemory('coordination/task-123', { taskId: 'task-123', status: 'in_progress', assignedTo: 'agent-0', dependencies: ['task-122'] }); // Wait for synchronization await delay(100); // All other agents should have access to the data for (let i = 1; i < swarmInstances.length; i++) { const retrieved = await swarmInstances[i].retrieveMemory('coordination/task-123'); expect(retrieved).toBeDefined(); expect(retrieved.value.taskId).toBe('task-123'); expect(retrieved.value.status).toBe('in_progress'); } }); it('should handle memory conflicts with CRDT resolution', async () => { // RED: No conflict resolution const conflictData = [ { agent: 0, data: { version: 1, value: 'agent-0-data', timestamp: Date.now() } }, { agent: 1, data: { version: 1, value: 'agent-1-data', timestamp: Date.now() + 10 } }, { agent: 2, data: { version: 1, value: 'agent-2-data', timestamp: Date.now() + 5 } } ]; // Concurrent writes from different agents await Promise.all( conflictData.map(({ agent, data }) => swarmInstances[agent].storeMemory('conflict/key', data) ) ); await delay(200); // Allow CRDT resolution // All agents should converge to the same state (latest timestamp wins) const states = await Promise.all( swarmInstances.map(agent => agent.retrieveMemory('conflict/key')) ); const uniqueStates = new Set(states.map(s => JSON.stringify(s.value))); expect(uniqueStates.size).toBe(1); // All states should be identical // Should resolve to agent-1-data (latest timestamp) expect(states[0].value.value).toBe('agent-1-data'); }); }); describe('Transaction Coordination', () => { it('should handle distributed transactions across agents', async () => { // RED: No distributed transaction support const transactionId = 'tx-' + Date.now(); // Start distributed transaction const transaction = await memoryManager.beginDistributedTransaction(transactionId, { participants: ['agent-0', 'agent-1', 'agent-2'], timeout: 5000 }); // Each agent performs operations within the transaction await Promise.all([ swarmInstances[0].transactionalUpdate('agent-0-data', { value: 'data-0' }, transaction), swarmInstances[1].transactionalUpdate('agent-1-data', { value: 'data-1' }, transaction), swarmInstances[2].transactionalUpdate('agent-2-data', { value: 'data-2' }, transaction) ]); // Commit transaction await transaction.commit(); // Verify all operations committed successfully const results = await Promise.all([ memoryManager.retrieve('agent-0-data'), memoryManager.retrieve('agent-1-data'), memoryManager.retrieve('agent-2-data') ]); expect(results[0].value.value).toBe('data-0'); expect(results[1].value.value).toBe('data-1'); expect(results[2].value.value).toBe('data-2'); }); }); }); ``` ### Phase 5: Security & Edge Cases (TDD Red-Green-Refactor) #### 5.1 SQL Injection Prevention Tests **Test File**: `/tests/security/sqlite-injection-prevention.test.js` ```javascript describe('SQLite Security - SQL Injection Prevention', () => { let secureConnection; beforeEach(async () => { secureConnection = await createSecureConnection(':memory:', { parameterizedOnly: true, inputValidation: true, queryTimeouts: true }); }); describe('Input Sanitization', () => { it('should prevent SQL injection in prepared statements', async () => { // RED: No injection prevention const maliciousInput = "'; DROP TABLE agents; SELECT '1"; // This should be safely parameterized const result = await secureConnection.query( 'SELECT * FROM agents WHERE name = ?', [maliciousInput] ); // Table should still exist const tableCheck = await secureConnection.query( 'SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type="table" AND name="agents"' ); expect(tableCheck.rows).toHaveLength(1); expect(result.rows).toHaveLength(0); // No matches for malicious input }); it('should reject non-parameterized queries with user input', async () => { // RED: No query validation const userInput = "admin'; DROP TABLE agents; --"; await expect( secureConnection.rawQuery(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE role = '${userInput}'`) ).rejects.toThrow('Raw queries with interpolated values are not allowed'); }); it('should validate and sanitize input parameters', async () => { // RED: No input validation const invalidInputs = [ { input: null, expected: 'Parameter cannot be null' }, { input: undefined, expected: 'Parameter cannot be undefined' }, { input: new Date(), expected: 'Date objects must be converted to ISO string' }, { input: { malicious: 'data' }, expected: 'Complex objects must be JSON serialized' } ]; for (const { input, expected } of invalidInputs) { await expect( secureConnection.query('SELECT * FROM agents WHERE data = ?', [input]) ).rejects.toThrow(expected); } }); }); describe('Query Timeouts & Resource Limits', () => { it('should enforce query timeouts to prevent DoS', async () => { // RED: No timeout enforcement const longRunningQuery = ` WITH RECURSIVE r(i) AS ( SELECT 0 UNION ALL SELECT i FROM r LIMIT 2000000 ) SELECT i FROM r WHERE i = 1000000; `; await expect( secureConnection.query(longRunningQuery, [], { timeout: 1000 }) ).rejects.toThrow('Query timeout exceeded'); }); it('should limit result set sizes', async () => { // RED: No result size limits // Create large dataset await secureConnection.query('CREATE TABLE large_table (id INTEGER, data TEXT)'); const insertStmt = await secureConnection.prepare('INSERT INTO large_table VALUES (?, ?)'); for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { await insertStmt.run([i, `data-${i}`]); } await expect( secureConnection.query('SELECT * FROM large_table', [], { maxRows: 1000 }) ).rejects.toThrow('Result set exceeds maximum allowed size'); }); }); }); ``` ## ๐ŸŽฏ Test Coverage Requirements ### Coverage Targets by Component | Component | Statements | Branches | Functions | Lines | |-----------|------------|----------|-----------|-------| | SQLite Adapter | 95% | 90% | 95% | 95% | | Connection Pool | 90% | 85% | 90% | 90% | | Auto-Reconnect | 85% | 80% | 85% | 85% | | Memory Manager | 95% | 90% | 95% | 95% | | Security Layer | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | ### Critical Path Testing 1. **Connection Establishment**: 100% coverage of fallback hierarchy 2. **Transaction Handling**: All ACID properties verified 3. **Error Recovery**: All failure scenarios tested 4. **Performance Optimization**: All optimizations benchmarked 5. **Security Measures**: All attack vectors covered ## ๐Ÿš€ Performance Benchmarks ### Target Performance Metrics | Operation | Target | Measurement Method | |-----------|--------|--------------------| | Connection Pool Acquire | <10ms | Average over 1000 operations | | WAL Mode Improvement | >2x vs Journal | Bulk insert comparison | | Auto-Reconnect Time | <500ms | Network simulation | | Cross-Agent Sync | <100ms | 5-agent coordination | | Query Performance | >12x improvement | Optimized vs unoptimized | ## ๐Ÿ“ Implementation Timeline ### Week 1-2: Foundation - [ ] Implement SQLite adapter with fallback detection - [ ] Create connection wrapper with basic pooling - [ ] Write Phase 1 unit tests (Red-Green-Refactor) ### Week 3-4: Resilience & Optimization - [ ] Implement auto-reconnect mechanism - [ ] Add WAL mode optimization - [ ] Write Phase 2-3 tests (Red-Green-Refactor) ### Week 5-6: Integration & Security - [ ] Implement swarm coordination features - [ ] Add security measures and input validation - [ ] Write Phase 4-5 tests (Red-Green-Refactor) ### Week 7-8: Performance & Polish - [ ] Performance optimization and benchmarking - [ ] Edge case handling and error scenarios - [ ] Final integration testing and documentation ## ๐Ÿ”ง Mock Strategy ### External Dependencies Mocking ```javascript // Mock better-sqlite3 for testing fallback jest.mock('better-sqlite3', () => { return jest.fn().mockImplementation((dbPath) => ({ prepare: jest.fn(), exec: jest.fn(), pragma: jest.fn(), close: jest.fn() })); }); // Mock filesystem operations jest.mock('fs/promises', () => ({ readFile: jest.fn(), writeFile: jest.fn(), mkdir: jest.fn() })); // Mock network conditions for auto-reconnect testing class NetworkSimulator { static simulateConnectionLoss(duration = 1000) { // Implementation for network failure simulation } static simulateSlowNetwork(latency = 500) { // Implementation for high latency simulation } } ``` ## ๐Ÿ“Š Success Criteria ### Must-Have Requirements - [ ] All unit tests pass (>95% success rate) - [ ] Integration tests pass (>90% success rate) - [ ] Performance targets met (>12x improvement) - [ ] Security tests pass (100% coverage) - [ ] Cross-platform compatibility verified - [ ] Auto-reconnect reliability >99% - [ ] Connection pool efficiency >90% ### Stretch Goals - [ ] Performance improvement >15x - [ ] Test coverage >98% - [ ] Zero critical security vulnerabilities - [ ] Sub-10ms connection acquisition - [ ] Advanced CRDT conflict resolution This TDD strategy ensures robust, secure, and high-performance SQLite integration for the Gemini Flow swarm coordination system. The tests-first approach guarantees reliable implementation and comprehensive edge case coverage.