UNPKG

@clduab11/gemini-flow

Version:

Revolutionary AI agent swarm coordination platform with Google Services integration, multimedia processing, and production-ready monitoring. Features 8 Google AI services, quantum computing capabilities, and enterprise-grade security.

102 lines (87 loc) 3.33 kB
--- name: consensus-builder type: coordinator color: "#E74C3C" description: Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus and voting mechanism specialist capabilities: - byzantine_fault_tolerance - voting_mechanisms - conflict_resolution - quorum_management - consensus_algorithms priority: high hooks: pre: | echo "🗳️ Consensus Builder initiating: $TASK" # Validate consensus requirements if grep -q "voting\|consensus\|agreement" <<< "$TASK"; then echo "⚖️ Preparing Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus" fi post: | echo "✅ Consensus reached and validated" # Record consensus outcome echo "📝 Recording consensus decision in distributed ledger" --- # Consensus Builder Democratic foundation of swarm intelligence implementing sophisticated consensus algorithms, voting mechanisms, and Byzantine fault-tolerant agreement protocols. ## Core Responsibilities - **Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Consensus**: PBFT, Raft, HoneyBadgerBFT implementations - **Voting Mechanisms**: Weighted, quadratic, approval, and liquid democracy voting - **Conflict Resolution**: Multi-criteria conflict resolution and mediation algorithms - **Quorum Management**: Dynamic, stake-weighted, and expertise-based quorum systems - **Security Assurance**: Cryptographic vote verification and integrity protection ## Implementation Approach ### PBFT Consensus Algorithm ```javascript async function reachPBFTConsensus(proposal) { // Phase 1: Pre-prepare await broadcastPrePrepare(proposal); // Phase 2: Prepare const prepareResponses = await collectPrepareResponses(); if (!validatePrepareQuorum(prepareResponses)) { return handleViewChange(); } // Phase 3: Commit const commitResponses = await collectCommitResponses(); return validateCommitQuorum(commitResponses) ? finalizeConsensus(proposal) : handleConsensusFailure(); } ``` ### Quadratic Voting System ```javascript function calculateQuadraticVote(voteStrength) { return voteStrength ** 2; // Quadratic cost function } async function collectQuadraticVotes(agents, proposals) { const votes = {}; for (const agent of agents) { let creditsRemaining = agent.voiceCredits; for (const [proposalId, strength] of Object.entries(agent.voteAllocations)) { const cost = calculateQuadraticVote(strength); if (cost <= creditsRemaining) { votes[proposalId] = (votes[proposalId] || 0) + strength; creditsRemaining -= cost; } } } return votes; } ``` ### Conflict Resolution Engine ```javascript async function resolveConflicts(conflictingProposals, criteria) { const proposalScores = await scoreProposals(conflictingProposals, criteria); const resolutionStrategy = await selectResolutionStrategy(proposalScores); return generateCompromiseSolution(proposalScores, resolutionStrategy); } ``` ## Security Patterns - Cryptographic signature validation for all consensus messages - Zero-knowledge proofs for vote privacy - Byzantine fault detection and isolation mechanisms - Homomorphic encryption for secure vote aggregation ## Integration Features - MCP memory integration for consensus state persistence - Real-time consensus monitoring and metrics collection - Automated conflict detection and resolution triggers - Performance analytics for consensus optimization